- Evaluation Plan:
- 2019-2023, Cambodia
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 12/2020
- Completion Date:
- 12/2020
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 17,700
Final Evaluation: Collaborative Management for Watershed and Ecosystem Service Protection and Rehabilitation in the Cardamom Mountains, Upper Prek Thnot River Basin
Share
Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
tor | English | 724.15 KB | Posted | 931 |
![]() |
report | English | 3492.90 KB | Posted | 1048 |
![]() |
related-document | English | 641.57 KB | Posted | 941 |
Title | Final Evaluation: Collaborative Management for Watershed and Ecosystem Service Protection and Rehabilitation in the Cardamom Mountains, Upper Prek Thnot River Basin | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlas Project Number: | 90509 | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Plan: | 2019-2023, Cambodia | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||||||||
Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
Completion Date: | 12/2020 | ||||||||||||||
Planned End Date: | 12/2020 | ||||||||||||||
Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||||||
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||||||
SDG Target |
|
||||||||||||||
Evaluation Budget(US $): | 17,700 | ||||||||||||||
Source of Funding: | Project Budget | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 17,700 | ||||||||||||||
Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
Key Stakeholders: | Ministry of Agriculture (IP), other direct project partners - Department of Agricultural Land Resources Management, Provincial Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Kampong Speu), Mlup Baitong (NGO) | ||||||||||||||
Countries: | CAMBODIA |
Lessons | |
---|---|
Findings |
Recommendations | |
---|---|
1 | An exit strategy and sustainability plan need to be developed in close consultation with the project stakeholders before the project closure. |
2 | Explore the possibility of initiating community-led projects, such as through UNDP/ GEF Small Grants Program, to continue and strengthen some of the promising sustainable livelihood and community-based SLM interventions initiated through the project but requires more support for consolidation and larger impact. |
3 | On-farm SLM demonstrations should consider integrating participatory and group-based on-farm learning process such as Farmer Field School (FFS), which are known to be successful in farmer-to-farmer exchange of knowledge, skills and experience, and in enhancing community uptake of introduced technology. |
4 | Continue dialogue and advocacy with ELC-holding agribusinesses for collaboration on a longer term based on PPP model, building on the short-term cooperative agreement and collaborative experience initiated through this project. |
5 | Pursue and initiate PES schemes as a sustainable financing and environmental governance mechanism for ecosystem services, building on the ecosystem valuation done by the project. |
6 | Consolidate CF/ CPA activities and explore opportunities to link with REDD+ initiatives, learning from other CFs and CPAs that have successfully linked with REDD+. |
7 | Where possible, link management of CF/ CPAs to improved conditions of catchment area/ source of local water supply systems to demonstrate the importance of landscape conservation approach and the inter-linkage between community development and conservation objectives. |
8 | All knowledge and information generated by various consulting work done under the project need to be consolidated and documented systematically as ready references and basis for decision-making and planning future SLM and watershed management interventions. |