- Evaluation Plan:
- 2018-2022, Cape Verde
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Project
- Planned End Date:
- 09/2019
- Completion Date:
- 12/2019
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 30,000
Project mainstreaming biodiversity conservation into tourism
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR_MTR_MAINSTREAMING BIODIVERSITY.pdf |
tor | English | 371.16 KB | Posted | 89 |
| Final Report BIOTUR 03 Vincent - signed.pdf |
report | English | 5503.62 KB | Posted | 96 |
| Title | Project mainstreaming biodiversity conservation into tourism | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00090563 | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2018-2022, Cape Verde | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Project | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
| Completion Date: | 12/2019 | ||||||||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 09/2019 | ||||||||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| UNDP Signature Solution: |
|
||||||||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||||||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 30,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Source of Funding: | GEF funds | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 35,186 | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND COMMUNITIES, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONEMENT | ||||||||||||||
| Countries: | CAPE VERDE |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 |
It is necessary to revert to more mainstream approaches with an externalised PMU team fully dedicated to the project and avoid a mix of civil servants and external staff working alongside with similar responsibilities. |
| 2 | Redefine the chain of command for UGAP It is recommended to review the chain of command at UGAP level and clarify the roles of PMU Coordinator and Island Delegates (or Coordinator): the PMU Coordinator is the technical supervisor feeding in tasks and activities to UGAP staff while the MAA Delegate and UGAP Coordinator (for Sal) are administrative supervisors, facilitating UGAP’s staff work through required official authorisations, supply of vehicles… in short, assisting logistics and official formalities |
| 3 | Redefine/reconfirm the roles of UGAP staff and other direct stakeholders for NIM modality |
| 4 | Balance better the PMU staff expertise between tourism and biodiversity |
| 5 | Increase subcontracting and avoid PMU stand-alone implementation |
| 6 | Improve project implementation through committees streamlining |
| 7 | Improve communication between stakeholders |
| 8 | Institutional lobbying to raise awareness on the added value of mainstreaming biodiversity into the tourism sector |
| 9 | Lack of horizontal articulation between MAA and MTT |
| 10 | Institutional lobbying to alter the focus of the SDTIBM and take into account sustainable tourism principles |