- Evaluation Plan:
- 2018-2022, Fiji
- Evaluation Type:
- Project
- Planned End Date:
- 02/2020
- Completion Date:
- 01/2020
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 15,000
Kiribati Trade Capacity Development and Institutional Strengthening Project Evaluation
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Mid-Term Review Report_signed_14Jan2020.pdf |
report | English | 3845.71 KB | Posted | 214 |
 TOR_Mid-Term Independent Project Evaluation.doc |
tor | English | 262.00 KB | Posted | 163 |
| Title | Kiribati Trade Capacity Development and Institutional Strengthening Project Evaluation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | kiribati trade | ||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2018-2022, Fiji | ||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Project | ||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||
| Completion Date: | 01/2020 | ||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 02/2020 | ||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||
| UNDP Signature Solution: |
|
||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 15,000 | ||||||||
| Source of Funding: | Project | ||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 15,000 | ||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Kiribati Government | ||||||||
| Countries: | FIJI | ||||||||
| Comments: | Evaluation report is still in draft and we are expecting to get the final report completed by end of the month and this will be uploaded accordingly. |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | The implementation of future projects should take into account the AWP so as to ensure that the level of resourcing and implementation timeframe are better aligned with the objectives and scope of the Project. Also, the Project should install a Project Management System by incorporating project accounting, procurement, asset management, and grant disbursement. The system should be connected to MFED and UNDP to avoid delay in reconciliation and approval |
| 2 | The Project should give high priority to fully implement all key outputs that have been delivered but have not yet been implemented, particularly the TPF, in order to enhance the impact of the Project. |
| 3 | For not losing the benefits from the project interventions to date, UNDP should start working with MFED, MCIC, EIF and other potential partners to start designing and sourcing a Phase 2 Project. The Phase 2 Project should focus on implementing the major outputs of Phase 1 – particularly TPF, Foreign Investment Act 2018, Foreign investment Regulations 2019, and etc. The Phase 2 Project should continue to work on the activities not completed in Phase 1, such as E-Transaction Act, DTIS Update, and etc. In addition, the Phase 2 Project could seek novel and innovative financing modalities, for example, partnering between UNDP, MCIC, EIF and other financiers to demonstrate best practice projects such as fishery industry development project and tourism development project for expert and import. There is a clear need for a Phase 2 Project – with a focus on finalizing and fully implementing the major outputs delivered by the Project (Phase 1 Project). |
1. Recommendation:
The implementation of future projects should take into account the AWP so as to ensure that the level of resourcing and implementation timeframe are better aligned with the objectives and scope of the Project. Also, the Project should install a Project Management System by incorporating project accounting, procurement, asset management, and grant disbursement. The system should be connected to MFED and UNDP to avoid delay in reconciliation and approval
Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/09]
Installation of Project Management system which incorporates project accounting, procurement, asset management and grant disbursement connected to MFED and UNDP is very important in avoiding delays.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Installation of Project Management system which incorporates project accounting, procurement, asset management and grant disbursement connected to MFED and UNDP is very important in avoiding delays.
[Added: 2020/02/09] [Last Updated: 2020/04/02] |
Ruci and Srijana | 2020/03 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: This will be applicable when new project is designed. New Project Design has started ] This will be applicable when new project is designed. History |
2. Recommendation:
The Project should give high priority to fully implement all key outputs that have been delivered but have not yet been implemented, particularly the TPF, in order to enhance the impact of the Project.
Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/09]
This is well noted for designing of EIF Tier 1 Phase 2 project proposal as well as EIF Tier 2 project proposal.
It must be noted TPF is also implemented by the Trade division as part of their 2020 work plan.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In designing of EIF Tier 1 Phase 2 project proposal as well as EIF Tier 2 project proposal - to be considered
[Added: 2020/02/09] [Last Updated: 2020/10/04] |
Ruci and Srijana | 2020/10 | Completed | Next prodo is ready and comments has been addressed History |
3. Recommendation:
For not losing the benefits from the project interventions to date, UNDP should start working with MFED, MCIC, EIF and other potential partners to start designing and sourcing a Phase 2 Project. The Phase 2 Project should focus on implementing the major outputs of Phase 1 – particularly TPF, Foreign Investment Act 2018, Foreign investment Regulations 2019, and etc. The Phase 2 Project should continue to work on the activities not completed in Phase 1, such as E-Transaction Act, DTIS Update, and etc. In addition, the Phase 2 Project could seek novel and innovative financing modalities, for example, partnering between UNDP, MCIC, EIF and other financiers to demonstrate best practice projects such as fishery industry development project and tourism development project for expert and import. There is a clear need for a Phase 2 Project – with a focus on finalizing and fully implementing the major outputs delivered by the Project (Phase 1 Project).
Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/09]
This is very important and noted well. The designing of the Tier 1 Phase 2 is underway and is focused mainly on mainstreaming of trade based on approved trade policies, legislation and policies.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The designing of the Tier 1 Phase 2 is underway and is focused mainly on mainstreaming of trade based on approved trade policies, legislation and policies
[Added: 2020/02/09] [Last Updated: 2020/11/05] |
Ruci Yavoli and Srijana Rana | 2020/10 | Completed | Phase 2 has been designed and comments incorporated History |