- Evaluation Plan:
- 2022-2026, Barbados
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Project
- Planned End Date:
- 01/2022
- Completion Date:
- 03/2022
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 20,000
Climate Resilient Agriculture for Integrated Landscape Management
Share
Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
tor | English | 337.96 KB | Posted | 2 |
![]() |
report | English | 3202.26 KB | Posted | 2 |
Title | Climate Resilient Agriculture for Integrated Landscape Management | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlas Project Number: | 00097452 | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Plan: | 2022-2026, Barbados | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Project | ||||||||||||||
Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
Completion Date: | 03/2022 | ||||||||||||||
Planned End Date: | 01/2022 | ||||||||||||||
Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
UNDP Signature Solution: |
|
||||||||||||||
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2022-2025) |
|
||||||||||||||
SDG Target |
|
||||||||||||||
Evaluation Budget(US $): | 20,000 | ||||||||||||||
Source of Funding: | UNDP project budget | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 26,000 | ||||||||||||||
Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
Key Stakeholders: | Ministries of Climate; Physical Planning; Communication; Works; Social Development; Housing and Community Development; Gender Affairs; Economic Planning; Emergency Management agencies; Health and Well-being; Sustainable Development; Tourism; Energy | ||||||||||||||
Countries: | BARBADOS |
Lessons | |
---|---|
Findings |
Recommendations | |
---|---|
1 | Review the log frame and simplify several outputs including at least deleting certification related activities. |
2 | Push for quick-win SLM/CSA techniques or long-term land improvement with a high return on investments within a conventional farming system. |
3 | Consider watershed management interventions decentralisation with the support of on-site non-State actors for both watershed management plan formulation and (future) implementation |
4 | Make PMU more effective with either team removal or CTA additional support |
5 | Prioritise the finalisation of agreement with complementary interventions (please refer to the MTR description of this recommendation) |
6 | Consider NGO/non-State actors for CSA/SLM demonstration sites and farmers’ follow-up (adoption)- refer to stakeholder engagement plan. |
7 | Create a project Technical Committee to facilitate project’s activities’ operationalisation and ensuring project’s outputs quality control |
8 | Review and amend the stakeholder’s engagement plan following up Government’s institutional changes |
9 | Enlarge PSC membership (observatory role) with non-State actors to boost local ownership |
10 | Reassess the role of civil society with a view to more project inclusion (PSC, Technical Committee, activity delivery) |
11 | Make use of existing Ministry of Agriculture’s expertise with closer collaboration with division for specific activities (e.g., on bamboo control and Forestry Division) |
12 | Support the (re-)designing of an SLM database with GIS information with a stronger alignment with the Physical Planning Unit |
13 | Reconvene within 6 months an extraordinary PSC session to assess progress made on A, B, C recommendations and decide whether to close or not the project |