- Evaluation Plan:
- 2006-2011, Viet Nam
- Evaluation Type:
- Project
- Planned End Date:
- 04/2006
- Completion Date:
- 05/2006
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 22,000
Agrobiodiversity
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 00015592 - Agrobiodiversity - TOR.doc |
tor | Posted | 1905 | ||
| 00015592 - Agrobiodiversity - Eval Rep.doc |
report | English | Posted | 1314 | |
| 00015592 - Agrobiodiversity - Findings&Recom.doc |
summary | Posted | 678 |
| Title | Agrobiodiversity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | |||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2006-2011, Viet Nam | ||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Project | ||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||
| Completion Date: | 05/2006 | ||||||
| Planned End Date: | 04/2006 | ||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) | |||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 22,000 | ||||||
| Source of Funding: | |||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||
| Countries: | VIET NAM |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | It is assessed that the project overall achieved its designed objectives, completed 143 activities out of 159 activities. |
| 2 | It is recommended that a follow-up project or second phase is needed to continue and broaden impacts of the project results. |
| 3 | It pointed out that agro-biodiversity conservation is complex and difficult as - like no other subject - bridges between the widest distances of science and society. It links genetics with indigenous knowledge, farmers' participation with national interest in conservation, poverty alleviation with global markets, and it attempts to find local solutions to global threats like the worsening effects of global warming on food security. The Project limited its focus on conserving 6 selected crop groups through in-situ conservation. It pointed out that cross-institutional efforts and a comprehensive concept/definition of in-situ conservation must be adopted and incorporated into the design of the new phase/ project. |
1. Recommendation: It is assessed that the project overall achieved its designed objectives, completed 143 activities out of 159 activities.
Management Response: [Added: 2006/12/20]
Agreed with the assessment
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A
[Added: 2006/12/20] |
N/A | 2006/06 | Completed |
2. Recommendation: It is recommended that a follow-up project or second phase is needed to continue and broaden impacts of the project results.
Management Response: [Added: 2006/12/20]
Agreed with the recommendation.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A project concept and a proposal have already been drafted taken into accounts detailed comments and recommendations in the Evaluation Report. The PIF will be prepared per guidance of the Regional GEF
[Added: 2006/12/20] [Last Updated: 2008/01/07] |
Sustainable Development Cluster - UNDP VN and GEF Viet Nam | 2007/03 | Completed | The CO pursued the idea of formulating a new follow-up project, a draft project brief was produced. But due to changes in GEF Resources Allocation Frame work and priority setting of UNDP in Viet Nam and UNDP-GEF RCU, the project idea was canceled. |
3. Recommendation: It pointed out that agro-biodiversity conservation is complex and difficult as - like no other subject - bridges between the widest distances of science and society. It links genetics with indigenous knowledge, farmers' participation with national interest in conservation, poverty alleviation with global markets, and it attempts to find local solutions to global threats like the worsening effects of global warming on food security. The Project limited its focus on conserving 6 selected crop groups through in-situ conservation. It pointed out that cross-institutional efforts and a comprehensive concept/definition of in-situ conservation must be adopted and incorporated into the design of the new phase/ project.
Management Response: [Added: 2006/12/20]
Agreed with the comments and suggestions.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has taken into accounts while developing the follow-up project concept.
[Added: 2006/12/20] [Last Updated: 2010/01/21] |
Sustainable Development Cluster - UNDP VN | 2010/01 | Completed |