EU-China Biodiversity Programme

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2006-2010, China
Evaluation Type:
Project
Planned End Date:
12/2010
Completion Date:
07/2009
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
30,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document ECBP_Mid-Term_Evaluation_-_Final_Report_-_July_2009.pdf report English Posted 2421
Title EU-China Biodiversity Programme
Atlas Project Number:
Evaluation Plan: 2006-2010, China
Evaluation Type: Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 07/2009
Planned End Date: 12/2010
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Crisis Prevention & Recovery
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021)
Evaluation Budget(US $): 30,000
Source of Funding:
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Nationality
Team Leader
GEF Evaluation: No
Key Stakeholders:
Countries: CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
Comments: This is a terminal evaluation of the programme.
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1 Need to engage with broader ?biodiversity community of interest?, as represented by CBD Steering Committee.
2 The issue of how to collect and use the accumulated wealth of knowledge from the field projects should be a focus of ECBP?s work if the programme is extended.
3 VAC is not linked fully with MEP, so is inhibited in helping to build the ministry?s outreach and education capacity, or the field projects, so is less effective than it should be in managing knowledge from them.
4 Review all field projects for their relevance to policy development and then use field projects for policy development, as well capacity building, institutional strengthening and awareness raising.
5 Focal point for managing knowledge about the country?s biodiversity resources. The extended ECBP should be tasked on a cost-neutral basis with building consensus for this focal point and assembling its primary knowledge holdings on biodiversity and ecosystem management? with a proposal for the focal point developed in 2010 with a view to its establishment by the end of ECBP in 2011.
1. Recommendation: Need to engage with broader ?biodiversity community of interest?, as represented by CBD Steering Committee.
Management Response: [Added: 2010/02/01]

Through National Programme Director (NPD), organize CBD Steering Committee meeting to brief on ECBP MTE, identify measures for strengthening operational effectiveness of CBD Steering, e.g. support to International Year of Biodiversity in 2010 and preparations for COP 10. Additionally, CBD SC, along with ECBP PSC and UNDP and ECD projects, can help identify key ministries and opportunities for integrating biodiversity into sectoral plans and policies.

Key Actions:

2. Recommendation: The issue of how to collect and use the accumulated wealth of knowledge from the field projects should be a focus of ECBP?s work if the programme is extended.
Management Response: [Added: 2010/02/01]

A series of activities, by COSU, VAC, PMO and the field projects themselves will be planned to address this issue.

Key Actions:

3. Recommendation: VAC is not linked fully with MEP, so is inhibited in helping to build the ministry?s outreach and education capacity, or the field projects, so is less effective than it should be in managing knowledge from them.
Management Response: [Added: 2010/02/01]

Through NPD, encourage partnership with MEP?s Depts. of Education and Communication and Ecology and Nature Conservation through specific activities, such as preparation for International Year of Biodiversity into 2010: VAC will also work more directly with COSU and field projects to bring together awareness activities and materials, as part of the knowledge management task, above.

Key Actions:

4. Recommendation: Review all field projects for their relevance to policy development and then use field projects for policy development, as well capacity building, institutional strengthening and awareness raising.
Management Response: [Added: 2010/02/01]

The MTE proposes a joint PMO, VAC and COSU mission to all field projects. However, this might not be optimal, in part because of the time this would involve and the attention taken from other activities, but also because COSU, PMO and VAC already have a process for identifying policy and awareness-relevant projects and activities and have begun this review, in connection with the identification of criteria for extension of selected field projects.

Key Actions:

5. Recommendation: Focal point for managing knowledge about the country?s biodiversity resources. The extended ECBP should be tasked on a cost-neutral basis with building consensus for this focal point and assembling its primary knowledge holdings on biodiversity and ecosystem management? with a proposal for the focal point developed in 2010 with a view to its establishment by the end of ECBP in 2011.
Management Response: [Added: 2010/02/01]

Response: This is an issue that should be raised with the CBD Steering Committee, as part of the MTE recommendations, since it would require consensus among key agencies.

Key Actions:

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org