- Evaluation Plan:
- 2006-2010, Belarus
- Evaluation Type:
- Outcome
- Planned End Date:
- 08/2007
- Completion Date:
- 09/2007
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 9,470
Outcome evaluation on UNDP Chernobyl related activities 2001-2006
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR _Chernobyl Outcome Evaluation_ENGLISH_FINAL.doc |
tor | Posted | 1108 | ||
| EVALUATION REPORT _Outcome Eval_Belarus_FINAL.doc |
report | Posted | 5853 | ||
| Belarus_lessons learnt from Outcome Evaluation.doc |
summary | Posted | 936 |
| Title | Outcome evaluation on UNDP Chernobyl related activities 2001-2006 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | |||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2006-2010, Belarus | ||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Outcome | ||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||
| Completion Date: | 09/2007 | ||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 08/2007 | ||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017) |
|
||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 9,470 | ||||||||
| Source of Funding: | |||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||||
| Countries: | BELARUS, REPUBLIC OF |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
View report for recommendation
1. Recommendation:
Management Response: [Added: 2009/02/09]
UNDP Management Response Template Outcome Evaluation "UNDP contribution towards socio-economic rehabilitation in Chernobyl affected areas since 2001" Date: 10.01.2007 Prepared by: Anna Litvinova Position: Programme Officer Unit/Bureau: UNDP Belarus Cleared by: Valiantsina Stalyho Position: ARR Programme Unit/Bureau: UNDP Belarus Input into and update in ERC: Valiantsina Stalyho Position: M&E focal point Unit/Bureau: UNDP Belarus Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 1: UNDP may wish to consider using all available information resources and the results of various research efforts to maintain an inventory of the short term, medium term and long term problems created by Chernobyl, and to clarify where a country concerned, sub region, region, international community can best play a part in resolving them. That would provide a scientific and policy basis for a concerted effort going forward at all three levels: global, regional and national. Such inventory should be updat
Key Actions: