PIREP

PIREP

Completedon 31 Oct, 2006
Evaluation Plan
Planned End Date
Oct 2006
Evaluation Type
Project
Management Response
Yes
Evaluation Budget
$13,000
Summary
3.2.1 Lessons learned on the project design of UNDP/GEF projects in general PIREP has basically been an exercise to formulate a region-wide initiative to promote RE technology development and utilization. Normally, GEF makes funding available through its PDF window for project preparation. These 'PDF' activities do not formally require an evaluation, only the (medium or full-sized) project itself. Since PIREP was formally a MSP, not a PDF, this PIREP review offers a rare opportunity to evaluate the project preparation process itself. Some lessons learned can be derived from looking at the process of implementation of PIREP and the formulation of its successor project, PIGGAREP. Here, the Evaluator takes the liberty of drawing also from his own experience in the design or evaluation of about 15 UNDP/GEF climate change projects and comes to some lessons learned:  In the design process, it is important to consult widely with a broad range of stakeholders, not only the energy ministry, office or unit involved, but also to engage in the design stage other government entities, utilities, RET suppliers, financial intermediaries and, last but not least, the end-users of the renewable energy technologies. This consultation should be more than just holding a one or two day workshop and pretend that all barriers and options have been analyzed and prioritized; it may take, depending on the coverage and complexity of the envisaged project, successive rounds of informal and formal meetings with stakeholders. Realistic planning should be ensured for the effective and timely implementation of the project, including a well-thought-out logical framework of objectives, expected outputs and activities, a plan for monitoring and evaluation of the project's outputs and impacts and budget and timeline. Unfortunately formulation of such frameworks is hampered by a number of issues: o UNDP and GEF formats in which the project implementation frameworks and o Proje
  • Evaluation Information
Evaluation Title
PIREP
Plan Period
Status
Completed
Type
Project
Management Response
Yes
Plan Date
31 Oct, 2006
Quality Assessment
No
Completion Date
31 Oct, 2006
Joint Programme
No
Joint Evaluation
No
Budget
$13,000
GEF Evaluation
Yes
Expand
Expenditure
$0
Countries
Samoa
Comments
Yes
Expand