Evaluation of the outcome 2.7: Public Sector Reform in Support of Efficient, Effective and Responsive and pro-poor public services promoted and supported though policy advice and capacity development activities

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2007-2008, Georgia
Evaluation Type:
Outcome
Planned End Date:
10/2007
Completion Date:
02/2009
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
14,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document Evaluation - Overview.doc report Posted 1296
Download document Evaluation - CBF.doc report Posted 623
Download document Evaluation - MoF.doc report Posted 589
Title Evaluation of the outcome 2.7: Public Sector Reform in Support of Efficient, Effective and Responsive and pro-poor public services promoted and supported though policy advice and capacity development activities
Atlas Project Number:
Evaluation Plan: 2007-2008, Georgia
Evaluation Type: Outcome
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 02/2009
Planned End Date: 10/2007
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Democratic Governance
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Public sector reform in support of efficient, effective, responsive and pro-poor public services promoted and supported through policy advice and capacity development activities
Evaluation Budget(US $): 14,000
Source of Funding:
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Team Leader
Team Leader
Team Leader
GEF Evaluation: No
Key Stakeholders:
Countries: GEORGIA, REPUBLIC OF
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1 before commencing a project confirm bona fide high level Senior Management ownership of the proposal via a demand driven process
2 consider and include all essential project elements required to achieve and sustain the desired impact(s)
3 analyze risk factors which could affect the sustainability of impact(s) and prepare risk minimization /mitigation measures
4 incorporate appropriate, cost effective, impact evaluation indicators and performance tracking systems
1. Recommendation: before commencing a project confirm bona fide high level Senior Management ownership of the proposal via a demand driven process
Management Response: [Added: 2008/02/11]

The recommendation will be incorporated into the 2-pager that serves as a necessary pre-condition before initiating the project

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
The recommendation will be incorporated into the 2-pager that serves as a necessary pre-condition before initiating the project
[Added: 2008/02/11]
Programme Analysts, Project Coordination Unit of the Capacity Building Fund project, Project Managers of the project under the relevant Outcome 2008/12 Completed The action was completed in January 2008
2. Recommendation: consider and include all essential project elements required to achieve and sustain the desired impact(s)
Management Response: [Added: 2008/02/11]

The recommendation will be taken into consideration

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
The recommendation will be incorporated into the 2-pager that serves as a necessary pre-condition before initiating the project
[Added: 2008/02/11]
Programme Analysts, Project Coordination Unit of the Capacity Building Fund project, Project Managers of the project under the relevant Outcome 2008/12 Completed The action was completed in January 2008
3. Recommendation: analyze risk factors which could affect the sustainability of impact(s) and prepare risk minimization /mitigation measures
Management Response: [Added: 2008/02/11]

The recommendation will be taken into consideration and necessary actions implemented during the period from January-December 2008

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
The recommendation was incorporated into the 2-pager that serves as a necessary pre-condition before initiating the project. This is also a requirement of the current Atlas-compliant documents.
[Added: 2008/02/11]
Programme Analysts, Project Coordination Unit of the Capacity Building Fund project, Project Managers of the project under the relevant Outcome 2008/12 Completed
4. Recommendation: incorporate appropriate, cost effective, impact evaluation indicators and performance tracking systems
Management Response: [Added: 2008/02/11]

The recommendation will be incorporated into the 2-pager that serves as a necessary pre-condition before initiating the project. This is also a requirement of the current Atlas-compliant documents.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
The recommendation was incorporated into the 2-pager that serves as a necessary pre-condition before initiating the project. This is also a requirement of the current Atlas-compliant documents.
[Added: 2008/02/11]
Programme Analysts, Project Coordination Unit of the Capacity Building Fund project, Project Managers of the project under the relevant Outcome 2008/12 Completed

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org