PRO 2

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2005-2010, Serbia
Evaluation Type:
Project
Planned End Date:
10/2008
Completion Date:
10/2008
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
35,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document TOR_for_mid_term_evaluation_PRO2.doc tor Posted 762
Download document PRO_Mid-Term_evaluation_Final_Report_Oct08.doc report English Posted 2372
Title PRO 2
Atlas Project Number:
Evaluation Plan: 2005-2010, Serbia
Evaluation Type: Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 10/2008
Planned End Date: 10/2008
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Democratic Governance
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021)
Evaluation Budget(US $): 35,000
Source of Funding:
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Nationality
Nebojsa Vukadinovic and D. Mijacic Team Leader
GEF Evaluation: No
Key Stakeholders:
Countries: SERBIA
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1 In the current model of implementation, PRO municipalities are not as a general rule expected to achieve a sufficient level of absorption capacity of external funds after the programme ends. Therefore, it is recommended that PRO Team focus more on capacity building of municipal administration.
1. Recommendation: In the current model of implementation, PRO municipalities are not as a general rule expected to achieve a sufficient level of absorption capacity of external funds after the programme ends. Therefore, it is recommended that PRO Team focus more on capacity building of municipal administration.
Management Response: [Added: 2009/09/24]

A comprehensive capacity building plan, as well as an action plan for implementation, be designed for each target municipality. These plans should be designed in partnership with municipal authorities and according to identified needs of each municipality. The plan should address creation of optimal institutional solution for each municipal administration and appropriate use of human resources. Ideally, the plan should cover capacity building of all identified needs, where PRO would focus only on issues that are in line with its programme objectives (PCM, Strategic planning and CAC).

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Create a stronger sense of ownership of the project and stronger partnership among beneficiaries as well as with PRO; Develop internal institutional capacity of beneficiaries in regard to programming and implementation of development projects; Create better conditions for programme-oriented budgeting within municipalities.
[Added: 2009/10/12]
Serbia 2009/10 Completed

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org