- Evaluation Plan:
- 2008-2013, RBAP
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 06/2011
- Completion Date:
- 05/2011
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 60,000
Oceanic Fisheries Management: Implementation of the Strategic Action Programme of the Pacific Small Island Developing States (Pacific SAP II)
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 2992_PIOFMP_TE final report v8.pdf |
report | English | 1785.25 KB | Posted | 1973 |
 Final_ManagementResponse_PIOFM.doc |
related-document | English | 78.50 KB | Posted | 807 |
| Title | Oceanic Fisheries Management: Implementation of the Strategic Action Programme of the Pacific Small Island Developing States (Pacific SAP II) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00046932 | ||||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2008-2013, RBAP | ||||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||||
| Completion Date: | 05/2011 | ||||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 06/2011 | ||||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 60,000 | ||||||||||
| Source of Funding: | GEF | ||||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||||||
| Location of Evaluation: | Regional | ||||||||||
| Countries: | FIJIMARSHALL ISLANDSPAPUA NEW GUINEASAMOATONGAVANUATU |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Need for Slimmed Down Log frame |
| 2 | Guidelines for RSC |
| 3 | Use of baseline studies |
| 4 | Annual Mini Reviews |
| 5 | Regional Projects/National intervention |
| 6 | Stronger engagement of NGO?s |
| 7 | Establishing branding recognition ?suggestion to promote project and it outputs and outcomes to fishery department staff, and to individuals directly on indirectly with the project in foreign affairs, legislation and the political machinery of government |
1. Recommendation: Need for Slimmed Down Log frame
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]
UNDP notes recommendation for compilation of slimmed down log frame to be used as basis for monitoring and evaluation. This is an issue to be considered in planning for proposed second phase of project
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slimmed down log frame
[Added: 2012/05/11] |
UNDP , FAO | 2012/12 | Overdue-Not Initiated | To be facilitated at later date |
2. Recommendation: Guidelines for RSC
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]
UNDP notes recommendation for scheduling RSC meetings over 2 days and as standalone meetings. This will ensure that sufficient time for deliberations by the regional steering committee delegates. As the PIOFM project life has ended UNDP recommends that this suggestion is considered for follow up phase of PIOFM project.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inclusion of recommendation in future preparing for future PIOFM phase two
[Added: 2012/05/11] |
UNDP and FFA | 2012/01 | Overdue-Not Initiated | PIOFM phase two concept paper/preparatory grant compiled and being finalized before submission |
3. Recommendation: Use of baseline studies
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]
UNDP agrees to the recommendation, in particular, incorporating findings of baseline study into overall project monitoring an evaluation. As the project has ended UNDP will ensure that this recommendation is incorporated into planning stages for as second phase of PIOFM project.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incorporation of suggestion into planning for second phase of project
[Added: 2012/05/11] |
UNDP, FFA and SPC & FAO | 2012/12 | Completed | Recommendation included in planning for second phase of PIOFM (developing project concept and particularly once the project has been accepted). |
4. Recommendation: Annual Mini Reviews
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]
There is value in conducting annual min reviews and something which will be suggested when planning for design of a phase two of PIOFM project
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consider recommendation when phase two funding has is successfully accessed and project is implemented
[Added: 2012/05/11] |
UNDP, FFA & FAO | 2012/01 | Overdue-Not Initiated | To be implemented in phase two of PIOFM project |
5. Recommendation: Regional Projects/National intervention
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]
Recommendation is noted. The first phase of project was successful in supporting regional mechanisms such as the establishment WCPFC .UNDP supports enhanced efforts towards nationally implemented activities during proposed second phase of project.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendation to be considered when planning for phase two of project
[Added: 2012/05/11] |
UNDP, FFA and FAO | 2012/12 | Overdue-Initiated | Recommendation considered in developing concept note for project phase two. Currently under facilitation. |
6. Recommendation: Stronger engagement of NGO?s
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]
UNDP recognizes the involvement of NGO?s in project implementation but agrees to recommendations that this is an area that could have been pursued further. UNDP supports stronger engagement of NGO?s in proposed second phase of project
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[Added: 2012/05/11] |
No due date | No deadline established |
7. Recommendation: Establishing branding recognition ?suggestion to promote project and it outputs and outcomes to fishery department staff, and to individuals directly on indirectly with the project in foreign affairs, legislation and the political machinery of government
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]
UNDP agrees with recommendation. It is important national fishery offices representatives are able to differentiate the GREF funded workshops/trainings from other donor funding. This is an issue for consideration in next proposed phase two of PIOFM project
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Considered in next phase of project
[Added: 2012/05/11] |
UNDP, FAO & FFA | 2013/01 | Overdue-Not Initiated | To be implemented once funding (proposed phase two) has been successfully sourced |