Oceanic Fisheries Management: Implementation of the Strategic Action Programme of the Pacific Small Island Developing States (Pacific SAP II)

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2008-2013, RBAP
Evaluation Type:
Final Project
Planned End Date:
06/2011
Completion Date:
05/2011
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
60,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document 2992_PIOFMP_TE final report v8.pdf report English 1785.25 KB Posted 1726
Download document Final_ManagementResponse_PIOFM.doc related-document English 78.50 KB Posted 567
Title Oceanic Fisheries Management: Implementation of the Strategic Action Programme of the Pacific Small Island Developing States (Pacific SAP II)
Atlas Project Number: 00046932
Evaluation Plan: 2008-2013, RBAP
Evaluation Type: Final Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 05/2011
Planned End Date: 06/2011
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Environment & Sustainable Development
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Development plans and programmes integrate environmentally sustainable solutions in a manner that promotes poverty reduction, MDG achievement and low-emission climate-resilient development
Evaluation Budget(US $): 60,000
Source of Funding: GEF
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Team Leader
GEF Evaluation: Yes
Evaluation Type:
Focal Area: International Waters
Project Type: FSP
GEF Phase: GEF-3
PIMS Number: 2992
Key Stakeholders:
Location of Evaluation: Regional
Countries: FIJIMARSHALL ISLANDSPAPUA NEW GUINEASAMOATONGAVANUATU
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1 Need for Slimmed Down Log frame
2 Guidelines for RSC
3 Use of baseline studies
4 Annual Mini Reviews
5 Regional Projects/National intervention
6 Stronger engagement of NGO?s
7 Establishing branding recognition ?suggestion to promote project and it outputs and outcomes to fishery department staff, and to individuals directly on indirectly with the project in foreign affairs, legislation and the political machinery of government
1. Recommendation: Need for Slimmed Down Log frame
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]

UNDP notes recommendation for compilation of slimmed down log frame to be used as basis for monitoring and evaluation. This is an issue to be considered in planning for proposed second phase of project

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Slimmed down log frame
[Added: 2012/05/11]
UNDP , FAO 2012/12 Overdue-Not Initiated To be facilitated at later date
2. Recommendation: Guidelines for RSC
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]

UNDP notes recommendation for scheduling RSC meetings over 2 days and as standalone meetings. This will ensure that sufficient time for deliberations by the regional steering committee delegates. As the PIOFM project life has ended UNDP recommends that this suggestion is considered for follow up phase of PIOFM project.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Inclusion of recommendation in future preparing for future PIOFM phase two
[Added: 2012/05/11]
UNDP and FFA 2012/01 Overdue-Not Initiated PIOFM phase two concept paper/preparatory grant compiled and being finalized before submission
3. Recommendation: Use of baseline studies
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]

UNDP agrees to the recommendation, in particular, incorporating findings of baseline study into overall project monitoring an evaluation. As the project has ended UNDP will ensure that this recommendation is incorporated into planning stages for as second phase of PIOFM project.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Incorporation of suggestion into planning for second phase of project
[Added: 2012/05/11]
UNDP, FFA and SPC & FAO 2012/12 Completed Recommendation included in planning for second phase of PIOFM (developing project concept and particularly once the project has been accepted).
4. Recommendation: Annual Mini Reviews
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]

There is value in conducting annual min reviews and something which will be suggested when planning for design of a phase two of PIOFM project

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Consider recommendation when phase two funding has is successfully accessed and project is implemented
[Added: 2012/05/11]
UNDP, FFA & FAO 2012/01 Overdue-Not Initiated To be implemented in phase two of PIOFM project
5. Recommendation: Regional Projects/National intervention
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]

Recommendation is noted. The first phase of project was successful in supporting regional mechanisms such as the establishment WCPFC .UNDP supports enhanced efforts towards nationally implemented activities during proposed second phase of project.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Recommendation to be considered when planning for phase two of project
[Added: 2012/05/11]
UNDP, FFA and FAO 2012/12 Overdue-Initiated Recommendation considered in developing concept note for project phase two. Currently under facilitation.
6. Recommendation: Stronger engagement of NGO?s
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]

UNDP recognizes the involvement of NGO?s in project implementation but agrees to recommendations that this is an area that could have been pursued further. UNDP supports stronger engagement of NGO?s in proposed second phase of project

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents

[Added: 2012/05/11]
No due date No deadline established
7. Recommendation: Establishing branding recognition ?suggestion to promote project and it outputs and outcomes to fishery department staff, and to individuals directly on indirectly with the project in foreign affairs, legislation and the political machinery of government
Management Response: [Added: 2012/04/23]

UNDP agrees with recommendation. It is important national fishery offices representatives are able to differentiate the GREF funded workshops/trainings from other donor funding. This is an issue for consideration in next proposed phase two of PIOFM project

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Considered in next phase of project
[Added: 2012/05/11]
UNDP, FAO & FFA 2013/01 Overdue-Not Initiated To be implemented once funding (proposed phase two) has been successfully sourced

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

220 East 42nd Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org