- Evaluation Plan:
- 2011-2015, Serbia
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 12/2016
- Completion Date:
- 03/2016
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 32,000
Ensuring financial sustainability of the protected area system of Serbia
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR-Ensuring Financial Sustainability of the Protected Area System of Serbia Terminal Evaluation.doc |
tor | English | 317.50 KB | Posted | 225 |
 Ensuring Financial Sustainability of the Protected Area System of Serbia fina evaluation report.pdf |
report | English | 1823.56 KB | Posted | 455 |
| Title | Ensuring financial sustainability of the protected area system of Serbia | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 0074312 | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2011-2015, Serbia | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
| Completion Date: | 03/2016 | ||||||||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 12/2016 | ||||||||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017) |
|
||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 32,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Source of Funding: | GEF | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 32,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning | ||||||||||||||
| Countries: | SERBIA |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Association for Protected Areas. As mentioned through the report, any support to the Association for Protected Areas, at both the national and regional levels, would be well invested funding. |
1. Recommendation:
Association for Protected Areas. As mentioned through the report, any support to the Association for Protected Areas, at both the national and regional levels, would be well invested funding.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/12/01] [Last Updated: 2016/12/01]
Project closed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/a
[Added: 2016/12/01] |
n/a | 2016/06 | Completed |