- Evaluation Plan:
- 2012-2016, Mozambique
- Evaluation Type:
- UNDAF
- Planned End Date:
- 11/2015
- Completion Date:
- 11/2015
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 150,000
Evaluation of UNDAF 2012-2016
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 MOZAMBIQUE UNDAF 2012-2015 FINAL EVALUATION - FINAL TORS.pdf |
tor | English | 3653.80 KB | Posted | 941 |
| 14122015 UNDAF Evaluation Report_Final.pdf |
report | English | 2854.68 KB | Posted | 1774 |
| Title | Evaluation of UNDAF 2012-2016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | |||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2012-2016, Mozambique | ||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | UNDAF | ||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||
| Completion Date: | 11/2015 | ||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 11/2015 | ||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017) | |||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 150,000 | ||||||||
| Source of Funding: | Trac 1 | ||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 142,000 | ||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Government, UN agencies, academic institutions, development partners | ||||||||
| Countries: | MOZAMBIQUE |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Recommendation 1: The UNDAF needs to strengthen its alignment with the National Plans especially in terms of timing. |
| 2 | Recommendation 2: UNDAF implementation needs to emphasize a collective strategic vision of the UN?s contribution to national priorities, and focus the UN?s limited resources on those issues where the UN can make the biggest difference, based on its comparative advantage and capacities. |
| 3 | Recommendation 3: The coming UNDAP should articulate a clear theory of change for the next country program and define its role within the change process to maximize its comparative advantage and resources. |
| 4 | Recommendation 4: The Government needs to take ownership and leadership of the UNDAF implementation in order to ensure that the UNDAF contributes to the national priorities. |
| 5 | Recommendation 5: The M&E group could be ?empowered? and play a more active role in all stages of UNDAF. |
| 6 | Recommendation 6: The UN should strengthen the use of effective RBM and M&E systems to monitor and manage the UNDAF strategically. |
| 7 | Recommendation 7: The UNDAF could progressively be implemented through more joint programmes, carefully chosen, after a cost-benefit analysis. |
| 8 | Recommendation 8: Speeding up fund disbursements and harmonising reporting requirements. |
| 9 | Recommendation 9: The UNCT should ensure a better resource mobilization around UNDAF strategic goals. |
| 10 | Recommendation 10: Sustainability of programmes being implemented need to be clear. |
1. Recommendation: Recommendation 1: The UNDAF needs to strengthen its alignment with the National Plans especially in terms of timing.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
2. Recommendation: Recommendation 2: UNDAF implementation needs to emphasize a collective strategic vision of the UN?s contribution to national priorities, and focus the UN?s limited resources on those issues where the UN can make the biggest difference, based on its comparative advantage and capacities.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
3. Recommendation: Recommendation 3: The coming UNDAP should articulate a clear theory of change for the next country program and define its role within the change process to maximize its comparative advantage and resources.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
4. Recommendation: Recommendation 4: The Government needs to take ownership and leadership of the UNDAF implementation in order to ensure that the UNDAF contributes to the national priorities.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
5. Recommendation: Recommendation 5: The M&E group could be ?empowered? and play a more active role in all stages of UNDAF.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
6. Recommendation: Recommendation 6: The UN should strengthen the use of effective RBM and M&E systems to monitor and manage the UNDAF strategically.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
7. Recommendation: Recommendation 7: The UNDAF could progressively be implemented through more joint programmes, carefully chosen, after a cost-benefit analysis.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
8. Recommendation: Recommendation 8: Speeding up fund disbursements and harmonising reporting requirements.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
9. Recommendation: Recommendation 9: The UNCT should ensure a better resource mobilization around UNDAF strategic goals.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions:
10. Recommendation: Recommendation 10: Sustainability of programmes being implemented need to be clear.
Management Response: [Added: 2016/01/06]
In 2016, UNCT will create an Interagency Task Force to address the recommendation.
Key Actions: