- Evaluation Plan:
- 2013-2020, South Africa
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Project
- Planned End Date:
- 05/2015
- Completion Date:
- 05/2015
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 11,219
Market Transformation through Energy Efficiency Standards and Labelling of Appliances in South Africa
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 S&L MTR ToR_Feb2015.pdf |
tor | English | 365.97 KB | Posted | 369 |
| PIMS 3277 MTR report 2015 final.pdf |
report | English | 2339.81 KB | Posted | 1035 |
| Title | Market Transformation through Energy Efficiency Standards and Labelling of Appliances in South Africa | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00077334 | ||||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2013-2020, South Africa | ||||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Project | ||||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||||
| Completion Date: | 05/2015 | ||||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 05/2015 | ||||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017) |
|
||||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 11,219 | ||||||||||
| Source of Funding: | GEF | ||||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Department of Energy, UNDP, Local communities | ||||||||||
| Countries: | SOUTH AFRICA | ||||||||||
| Comments: | The evaluation is envisaged to controbute to market trnsformation through Energy Efficiency Standards and Labelling of appliances in South Africa |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | The implementing agency and implementation partners should expedite the process of finding a resolution to the impasse regarding the cash disbursement modality of the project. |
| 2 | The chairpersonship of the PSC should be delegated to the Director of Energy Efficiency Initiatives in the Clean Energy Division of the DoE, and the Chief Director should be regularly informed and consulted for strategic advice. |
| 3 | The project manager should report directly to the Director of Energy Efficiency Initiatives. The position of project administrative assistant should be considered to be maintained for the duration of the project operational implementation period; extension of the administrative assistant position should be evaluated at the end of the 6-month provisional employment period. |
| 4 | Granting a one-year, no-cost time extension of the project until September 2017. |
| 5 | Working out a cumulative work-plan, extending the proposed project closure date of September 2017 in order to rationalise the implementable activities within the given timeframe and the associated costs required. |
1. Recommendation: The implementing agency and implementation partners should expedite the process of finding a resolution to the impasse regarding the cash disbursement modality of the project.
Management Response: [Added: 2015/08/05]
UNDP, SABS and DoE have agreed on the content of the draft Memorandum of Agreement. DoE is working on securing the Director-General?s signature before SABS signs off.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Securing the Director-General?s signature before SABS signs off.
[Added: 2015/08/05] |
DoE and SABS | 2015/06 | Completed |
2. Recommendation: The chairpersonship of the PSC should be delegated to the Director of Energy Efficiency Initiatives in the Clean Energy Division of the DoE, and the Chief Director should be regularly informed and consulted for strategic advice.
Management Response: [Added: 2015/08/05]
This recommendation will be discussed with the Chief Director and DDG for consideration.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organising a discussion with the Chief Director and DDG for consideration
[Added: 2015/08/05] |
DoE | 2015/06 | Completed |
3. Recommendation: The project manager should report directly to the Director of Energy Efficiency Initiatives.
The position of project administrative assistant should be considered to be maintained for the duration of the project operational implementation period; extension of the administrative assistant position should be evaluated at the end of the 6-month provisional employment period.
Management Response: [Added: 2015/08/05]
This recommendation will be discussed with the Chief Director & DDG for consideration. Recommendation accepted. The arrangement for a temporal appointment of the administrative assistant for a 6 month period is an expedient measure pending the results of the MTR process. However, the extension of the contract period will be subject to the Project Assistant?s performance during the first six month.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discussion with the Chief Director & DDG for consideration
[Added: 2015/08/05] |
DoE | 2015/06 | Completed | ||
| Extension of the contract based on the Project Assistant?s performance during the first six month
[Added: 2015/08/05] [Last Updated: 2017/12/13] |
UNDP | 2015/11 | Completed | History |
4. Recommendation: Granting a one-year, no-cost time extension of the project until September 2017.
Management Response: [Added: 2015/08/05]
Recommendation accepted. UNDP has committed to write a letter to UNDP-GEF unit justifying the extension of the project to September 2017 (dependent upon signing of the DoE-SABS MoA.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Write a letter to UNDP-GEF unit justifying the extension of the project to September 2017
[Added: 2015/08/05] [Last Updated: 2017/12/13] |
UNDP | 2015/10 | Completed | History |
5. Recommendation: Working out a cumulative work-plan, extending the proposed project closure date of September 2017 in order to rationalise the implementable activities within the given timeframe and the associated costs required.
Management Response: [Added: 2015/08/05]
Recommendation accepted. The Work Plan will be drafted and presented in the next PSC meeting. However, this extended Work Plan is subject to approval of the extension period by UNDP/GEF.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Work Plan will be drafted and presented in the next PSC meeting
[Added: 2015/08/05] [Last Updated: 2017/12/13] |
DoE/PMU | 2015/11 | Completed | The extended Work Plan is subject to approval of the extension period by UNDP/GEF. History |