- Evaluation Plan:
- 2013-2017, Costa Rica
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 03/2015
- Completion Date:
- 03/2015
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 25,000
»
Costa Rica »
2013-2017 »
TERMINAL EVALUATION (TE) OF THE FIFTH OPERATIONAL PHASE OF THE GEF SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM IN COSTA RICA
TERMINAL EVALUATION (TE) OF THE FIFTH OPERATIONAL PHASE OF THE GEF SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM IN COSTA RICA
Share
Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
tor | English | 50.46 KB | Posted | 1457 |
![]() |
report | English | 651.53 KB | Posted | 1248 |
Title | TERMINAL EVALUATION (TE) OF THE FIFTH OPERATIONAL PHASE OF THE GEF SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM IN COSTA RICA | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlas Project Number: | 00079305 | ||||||||||
Evaluation Plan: | 2013-2017, Costa Rica | ||||||||||
Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||||
Status: | Completed | ||||||||||
Completion Date: | 03/2015 | ||||||||||
Planned End Date: | 03/2015 | ||||||||||
Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||
Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||
Evaluation Budget(US $): | 25,000 | ||||||||||
Source of Funding: | GEF | ||||||||||
Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||
Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||
Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||
GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||
Key Stakeholders: | |||||||||||
Countries: | COSTA RICA |
Lessons | |
---|---|
Findings |
Recommendations | |
---|---|
1 | Corrective actions for the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the project |
2 | Actions to follow up or reinforce initial benefits from the project |
3 | Proposals for future directions underlining main objectives |
4 | Best and worst practices in addressing issues relating to relevance, performance and success |
Key Action Update History
Loading..
1. Recommendation: Corrective actions for the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the project
Management Response: [Added: 2015/10/29]
Corrective measures are under implementation
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 M&E System would be used fully in the new SGP OPVI Project.
[Added: 2015/10/29] [Last Updated: 2017/10/30] |
SGp MU | 2015/11 | Completed | History | |
1.2 In PPG process carry out a discussion among NC, NSC, UNDP CO and UNDP RTA to establish clear reporting lines and coordination responsibilities.
[Added: 2015/10/29] [Last Updated: 2017/10/30] |
SGP MU | 2015/11 | Completed | History | |
1.3 The size of the National Coordination Team will remain the same. Adjustments could be made later on if SGP is used as a project implementation mechanism in other FSP.
[Added: 2015/10/29] [Last Updated: 2017/10/30] |
SGP MU | 2015/11 | Completed | History |
2. Recommendation: Actions to follow up or reinforce initial benefits from the project
Management Response: [Added: 2015/10/29]
All actions are under implementation
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 To maintain SGP existing operation in OPVI depends on the governmental decision about geographical emphasis and funds allocated from the STAR. OPVI decision was to reduce the SGP scope to two watersheds in the Central Pacific Area and halve the funds.
[Added: 2015/10/29] |
Government | 2015/07 | Completed | ||
2.2 SGP will be a FSP on OPVI but the lines of work won?t be continuing and this may impact the sustainability of the initiatives.
[Added: 2015/10/29] |
Government | 2015/07 | Completed |
3. Recommendation: Proposals for future directions underlining main objectives
Management Response: [Added: 2015/10/29]
All proposals have been considered
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.1 Activities on land degradation will be concentrated in the Jesus Maria river basin and will be extended to the Barranca river basin, the second most depredated river basin in the country.
[Added: 2015/10/29] [Last Updated: 2018/11/07] |
SGP MU | 2018/12 | Completed | History |
4. Recommendation: Best and worst practices in addressing issues relating to relevance, performance and success
Management Response: [Added: 2015/10/29]
This is being considered and will inform the new SGP phase.
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.1 SGP OPVI proposal incorporates gender and youth specific indicators,
[Added: 2015/10/29] [Last Updated: 2017/10/30] |
PMU | 2015/11 | Completed | History | |
4.2 The M&E System is being designed so that Project Objective indicators facilitate reporting to the GEF.
[Added: 2015/10/29] [Last Updated: 2017/10/30] |
PMU | 2015/11 | Completed | History | |
4.3 Political Incidence work will be mainly directed to local governments within the watershed.
[Added: 2015/10/29] [Last Updated: 2018/11/07] |
PMU | 2018/12 | Completed | History | |
4.4. The SGP website has been updated with the information related to OPV Project implementation
[Added: 2015/10/29] [Last Updated: 2017/10/30] |
PMU | 2015/12 | Completed | History |