Final evaluation of Joint Conflict Reduction Programme

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2013-2017, Sudan
Evaluation Type:
Final Project
Planned End Date:
06/2016
Completion Date:
05/2016
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
25,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document Mid-Term Review Report Final_JCRP July.pdf report English 597.68 KB Posted 568
Download document JCRP Evaluation Management Response Plan (Oct 2016)_final.pdf related-document English 40.17 KB Posted 213
Download document JCRP_Final_Evaluation_Final_Report.pdf report English 600.71 KB Posted 238
Title Final evaluation of Joint Conflict Reduction Programme
Atlas Project Number:
Evaluation Plan: 2013-2017, Sudan
Evaluation Type: Final Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 05/2016
Planned End Date: 06/2016
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Crisis Prevention & Recovery
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. National and local institutions have the capacities to prevent, reduce and mitigate the impact of conflict
Evaluation Budget(US $): 25,000
Source of Funding: Jonit Programme Resources
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): 25,000
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: Yes
  • Joint with UNDP, IOM , MPTF , and MIC
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Isabel Candela and Elsadig Kara
Isabel Candela Consultant
GEF Evaluation: No
Key Stakeholders: UNDP, IOM , MPTF , and MIC
Countries: SUDAN
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1

Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 1: Explore the incorporation of the peace dividend/hardware approach into other ongoing or planned programmes in other sectors, particularly in relation to stabilization and livelihoods, Demobilization Disarmament Reintegration (DDR), governance and rule of law, but also in relation to climate change and natural resource management in a balanced approach.

2

Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 2: Continue to explore all possible options to increase conflict sensitivity in programming and focus on support to the government linked bodies and individuals for peacebuilding programmes and others in conflict affected areas.

1. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 1: Explore the incorporation of the peace dividend/hardware approach into other ongoing or planned programmes in other sectors, particularly in relation to stabilization and livelihoods, Demobilization Disarmament Reintegration (DDR), governance and rule of law, but also in relation to climate change and natural resource management in a balanced approach.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/11/08] [Last Updated: 2016/11/08]

The evaluation recommendations were discussed in the project steering committee and in UNDP programme internal meetings as well as Peace building and Social Cohesion (PBSC) planning meetings. The below set actions are agreed upon

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Assess how other UNDP projects could use this entry point to promote social cohesion using the approach of combining peace dividend/hardware approach with peace and reconciliation components.
[Added: 2016/11/08] [Last Updated: 2017/05/17]
Peace Building and Social Cohesion Unit (PBSC) through C2SP approach 2016/12 Completed History
Through the Community Stabilization and Security Programme (C2SP) and Supporting Sudan Peace Structures (SSPS) activities continue to expand partnerships linking State-level Peacebuilding Mechanisms and Peace Ambassadors closely to the Community Management Committees (CMCs).
[Added: 2016/11/08] [Last Updated: 2017/05/28]
Peace Building and Social Cohesion Unit (PBSC) through new C2SP approach 2016/12 Completed Linked in the new C2SP project proposal History
Explore how JCRP lessons learned and partnerships can be linked to other existing initiatives, including IcSP projects but also other UNDP projects.
[Added: 2016/11/08] [Last Updated: 2017/05/28]
Peace Building and Social Cohesion Unit (PBSC) 2016/12 Completed Linked in the new C2SP project proposal History
2. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 2: Continue to explore all possible options to increase conflict sensitivity in programming and focus on support to the government linked bodies and individuals for peacebuilding programmes and others in conflict affected areas.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/11/08] [Last Updated: 2016/11/08]

The evaluation recommendations were discussed in the project steering committee and in UNDP programme internal meetings as well as Peace building and Social Cohesion (PBSC) planning meetings. The below set actions are agreed upon

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
2.1 Further promote outreach through the Sudan Peace Building Network, jointly facilitated by UNDP and PRI/UoK. Enhance outreach through the academic institutions and civil society organizations.
[Added: 2016/11/08] [Last Updated: 2017/05/28]
Peace Building and Social Cohesion Unit (PBSC) through the SSPS PIP 2016/12 No Longer Applicable [Justification: This has been done through the C2SP project proposal]
History
2.2 Use the development and roll-out of the Peacebuilding Manual to engage with a wide-range of stakeholders to include in future programming.
[Added: 2016/11/08] [Last Updated: 2017/11/27]
Peace Building and Social Cohesion Unit (PBSC) through the SSPS PIP and UN Women 2017/12 Completed Peace building Manual is developed, finalized and lunched on 23rd November 2017, ToT training is taking place for wide range of peace building practitioners and key stakeholders. It is On-Track History
2.3 Assessing levels of capacity and sustainability of the mechanisms supported by the programme, and particularly the state level peacebuilding mechanisms; and integrate in existing programs/projects
[Added: 2016/11/08] [Last Updated: 2017/05/28]
Peace Building and Social Cohesion Unit (PBSC) through the SSPS PIP and UN Women 2016/12 Completed History

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

220 East 42nd Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org