Evaluation of UNDP Support to Mine Action in Lao PDR, 2013-2016

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2012-2016, Lao
Evaluation Type:
Outcome
Planned End Date:
07/2015
Completion Date:
01/2016
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
10,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document Evaluation ToR - UN support to UXO Sector rev24Jun15-trackchanges.doc tor English 279.00 KB Posted 544
Download document CO evaluation__Final.docx report English 256.69 KB Posted 480
Download document UXO_NRA_20161208 Management Response signed.pdf related-document English 737.28 KB Posted 353
Title Evaluation of UNDP Support to Mine Action in Lao PDR, 2013-2016
Atlas Project Number:
Evaluation Plan: 2012-2016, Lao
Evaluation Type: Outcome
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 01/2016
Planned End Date: 07/2015
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Others
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Output 1.1. National and sub-national systems and institutions enabled to achieve structural transformation of productive capacities that are sustainable and employment - and livelihoods- intensive
Evaluation Budget(US $): 10,000
Source of Funding: Projects Budget
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Jo Durham
GEF Evaluation: No
Key Stakeholders: UXO Lao, NRA
Countries: LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
Comments: 1. Evaluation commissioned by UNDP Lao/Global evaluation of UNDPs work in mine action. 2. This evaluation of UXO sector does not contribute to any corporate outcome and output because it is identified as non-applies to any of them.
Lessons
1.

In order to solve the above mentioned issues, UNDP has developed the new project document (2017-2021) with an emphasis on monitoring and evaluation to measure the effectiveness of clearance operations towards improving the contribution of the UXO sector to the human development in contaminated areas. This will be in line with the SDG 18: Remove the UXO obstacle to national development which will be monitored closely by UNDP in close partnership with the Government of Lao.


Findings
1.

Relevance: The UNDP’s support is directly relevant to the priorities of the Government of Lao PDR and is clearly aligned with national development objectives, as outlined in the 7th National Plan for Poverty Eradication (NPPE), Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 9, and the Government’s international obligations under the Cluster Munition Convention (CCM). It should be noted, however, that while UXO contamination is in some of the poorest districts, there is no empirical evidence to support a causal link between UXO contamination and poverty. The UNDP plays a critical role in coordinating the Round Table Process and co-chairs the donor working groups for the UXO sector, with participation of key government officials, development partners and donors, and operators in the UXO sector. This provides a relevant forum for promoting dialogue between key stakeholders and government and is the primary platform for furthering the aid effectiveness agenda. Several donors and other stakeholders, however, were somewhat ambivalent towards the relevance of the UNDP’s support.

Effectiveness: Overall, the programme has achieved, or is likely to have achieved by the end of 2016 most of its outputs. However, there is no data related to what these outputs contributed to (i.e. outcome level data or whether or not these outputs achieved their intended purpose). Furthermore, there is no data related to some of the UNDP’s core programming principles, that is, capacity building, rights, safeguards, and gender or poverty reduction. In terms of the CCM, this is not particularly problematic. However, the UXO/mine action programme intends to contribute to human development outcomes, not simply the CCM commitments.  A more effective programme document would include outcome-level results to promote outcome-level monitoring, evaluation, and outcome reporting.

The Trust Fund mechanism was primarily set up to contribute to the achievement of the CCM and is in accordance with the Vientiane Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. The mechanism was valued, especially by non-resident donors. However, at the time of the evaluation, a number of resident donors expressed concern with the Trust and, in particular, coordination, outcome, and impact reporting. This, in part, relates to capacity, but also to the programme document that only commits to outputs. The absence of outcome monitoring and reporting, however, does not enable donors to understand the benefits and safeguards applied to maximise their investment and minimise harm.

Partnerships: The UNDP has a number of long-standing partners in the Lao PDR and its role of Co-Chair of the UXO Sector working under the Round Table Process is valued. However, a number of stakeholders were frustrated with the quality of communication and coordination. Furthermore, communication could be more impactful if reports included outcome measures. At the community level, more thought needs to be given to how the recently approved Cluster Munition Survey (CMTS) and other approved survey processes will be communicated at the community level.

Efficiency:  Overall, the structure of the Trust Fund is designed to maximise efficiency and is based on good practice enshrined in the Vientiane Declaration. While not explicit in the programme document, the demand for UXO clearance to contribute to development (which is rarely defined) has led service providers, including the UXO Lao, to undertake clearance for other UN organisations, such as the World Food Programme and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). While this enables investment, which may not have occurred otherwise, it has also contributed to inefficiencies. This is because clearance assets have been deployed to sites with no or very low levels of UXO. This partly relates to the lack of a national survey, whereby confirmed hazardous areas are located and mapped. This is beginning to be addressed through the CMTS. This is significant as clearance is time consuming and expensive, so efficient use of resources is important and the NRA and the UXO Lao should continue to monitor the efficiency of clearance operations to make further improvements if possible.

The UNDP has well documented procedures in place that are designed to promote cost and time effectiveness and competitiveness, but these are not always well understood by the UXO Lao or the NRA.  Without timely support from the UNDP, this can result in lost efficiencies. An important donor concern was the length of time taken to operationalise the NGO window in the Trust Fund, although at the time of the evaluation this was being addressed. There were some donor concerns regarding whether the GMS of 8% (agreed by member states) and direct costs associated with the programme provided value for money, although on the face of it, these charges seem similar to other providers.

Sustainability: For the purpose of this evaluation, sustainable outcomes relate to the sustainability of a UXO programme, given the absence of outcome data on operational activities of MRE, victim assistance, and clearance, and it is assumed that decontaminated land will not be re-contaminated. In their current form, neither the NRA office nor the UXO Lao are sustainable without donor funding. This is of concern as donor funds have not been constant over the last 20 years and this trend is likely to continue. Some donors are likely to exit the sector (or even leave Lao PDR all together) once the country exits the least developed nation status anticipated in 2020, and UXO/Mine Action may not fit neatly into the thematic funding windows. Notification 093/NRA provides some assurance that development agencies will have to budget for and purchase UXO clearance services where needed. 


Recommendations
1

Evaluation Recommendation 1: The UNDP, with NRA and the UXO Laos, should actively promote the allocation of resources to developing management capacities, clearly articulating how the UNDP’s support contributes to programme outputs and outcomes and capacity development.

2

Evaluation Recommendation 2: The UNDP should actively promote dialogue between the NRA, LNCRDPE, MPI, and other stakeholders, including province and district level planners, to articulate a transparent, systemic, and auditable process for task prioritisation, collection of relevant baseline and outcome indicators (possibly integrated into existing processes).

3

Evaluation Recommendation  3: The UNDP should support the NRA, the UXO Lao, and other relevant stakeholders, to identify how UXO/Mine Action might contribute to the SDG targets and identify what, if any, outcome or impact level data collection can be mainstreamed into other SDG data collection processes.

4

Evaluation Recommendation 4: The UNDP should support discussions within the NRA and the Survey and Clearance Technical Working Group to review the CMTS and other approved processes under the new concept of operations to enable community voices and concerns to be heard & ensure all community members are provided with appropriate information about decisions that affect them

5

Evaluation Recommendation 5: The UNDP should support discussions within the NRA and the Survey and Clearance Technical Working Group to determine how efficiency and effectiveness of the new concept of operations will be evaluated.

6

Evaluation Recommendation 6: The UNDP should support the NRA hold quarterly operational meetings with development partners (program manager level).

7

Evaluation Recommendation 7: The UNDP should support the NRA and UXO Lao to develop and implement an effective communication strategy, tailored to different stakeholder needs and focused on application of safeguards, outputs, inputs and progress against the capacity building workplans.

8

Evaluation Recommendation 8: The UNDP should support constructive dialog with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and development partners to determine if the Trust Fund and its Terms of Reference are still appropriate.

9

Evaluation Recommendation 9: The UNDP should continue to work with the NRA, the UXO Lao, and donors to ensure a coherent approach to the provision and coordination of technical advisory services.

10

Evaluation Recommendation 10: The UNDP should support the NRA and the UXO Lao to ensure a pro-poor, gender sensitive focus including gender indicators at the output and outcome level and implementing the recent GMAP 2014 action plan and recommendations related to the 2008 gender assessment.

11

Evaluation Recommendation 11: The UNDP should further develop the capacity of the NRA and UXO Lao in all stages of the information cycle and to develop and implement a sector monitoring and evaluation framework that articulates minimum, output and outcome indicators.

12

Evaluation Recommendation 12: The UNDP should support the NRA and the UXO Lao to integrate, monitor, and report on appropriate elements of the UNDP’s recently released Social and Environmental Safeguards into their work.

13

Evaluation Recommendation 13: The UNDP should continue to support the NRA to develop a strategy to transition to increased government financing of the sector. The strategy should be agreed on by the end of 2018, with implementation commencing at the beginning of 2019.

14

Evaluation Recommendation 14: The UNDP should facilitate dialogue between the NRA, Ministry of Health, and WHO, and other relevant organizations to develop an action plan to review the quality of the incident surveillance and data collection to ensure alignment with (current or planned) injury surveillance systems, the integration of epidemiological principals into the surveillance of UXO injury; and adherence to WHO’s minimal recommendation dataset for injury surveillance.

1. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 1: The UNDP, with NRA and the UXO Laos, should actively promote the allocation of resources to developing management capacities, clearly articulating how the UNDP’s support contributes to programme outputs and outcomes and capacity development.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/29]

Agreed – UNDP recognizes the need to articulate clear measurements for progress on institutional capacity building; it has already supported the Capacity Self-Assessment of both the NRA and UXO Lao in 2014. Progress has already been made in some of the highlighted areas and UXO Lao and NRA are formulating further plans to pursue and resource concrete capacity development outcomes.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
1.1. UNDP will continue to support the NRA and UXO Lao to articulate and implement clear action plans based on the Capacity Assessment; UNDP will offer technical support at all stages and will coordinate with other key actors in the sector.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed Action Plans prepared; will be presented at Project Board in Q1 2017. Key points incorporated in new Project Document. History
1.2. UNDP will include capacity building outcomes in the next programme of support to the UXO sector starting in 2017.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed New project designed with specific capacity building output. History
2. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 2: The UNDP should actively promote dialogue between the NRA, LNCRDPE, MPI, and other stakeholders, including province and district level planners, to articulate a transparent, systemic, and auditable process for task prioritisation, collection of relevant baseline and outcome indicators (possibly integrated into existing processes).

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/29]

Partially agree – UNDP recognizes that prioritisation of tasks is a key issue for attention in the sector, and has advocated for a clearer process in its role as co-chair of the UXO Sector Working Group. UNDP will continue to offer technical support to the development and articulation of a clear and transparent process. UNDP has already shared draft guidance for prioritisation and planning with the NRA. However, UNDP would clarify that the final responsibility for such a process, or its announcement, lies with the Government of Lao PDR, and the National Committee on Rural Development and Poverty Eradication specifically. UNDP welcomes the support of other stakeholders in advocating for, and supporting, the National Committee to make progress on this as soon as possible.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
2.1. UNDP will continue to discuss the draft prioritisation guidance with the NRA and will provide further technical assistance to encourage its finalization and implementation.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed Prioritisation process discussed and detailed by CTA in guidance document; Government referred to roll-out in 2017 during 6th MSP CCM. History
2.2. UNDP will continue to advocate publicly for a clear and transparent process, including at the Sector Working Group and other fora.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed UNDP and co-chair (USA) advocated for roll-out at SWG Nov 2016. History
3. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation  3: The UNDP should support the NRA, the UXO Lao, and other relevant stakeholders, to identify how UXO/Mine Action might contribute to the SDG targets and identify what, if any, outcome or impact level data collection can be mainstreamed into other SDG data collection processes.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/29]

Agree – UNDP recognizes its leading role in supporting the Government of Lao PDR to make progress on the Sustainable Development Goals. The broader UN system in Lao PDR is working on localization of the SDGs in Lao PDR. Global expertise and collaboration with UNMAS and UNICEF will be available to clarify the role of Mine Action/UXO in this context.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
3.1. UNDP will design its Country Programme in line with the UNDAF and SDGs with UXO support as a key component.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UNDP Lao PDR 2016/12 Completed New CPD endorsed in September 2016. History
3.2. UNDP will continue to support UXO Lao and NRA to improve its collection and analysis of data at the development outcome level.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2019/06/09]
UXO Unit 2018/12 Completed Support provided to NRA and UXO Lao and capacity is increased in both organizations History
4. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 4: The UNDP should support discussions within the NRA and the Survey and Clearance Technical Working Group to review the CMTS and other approved processes under the new concept of operations to enable community voices and concerns to be heard & ensure all community members are provided with appropriate information about decisions that affect them

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/29]

Agree – UNDP is aware of the need for all community members to have appropriate information about decisions and opportunities to be heard in the process of planning. The transition to evidence-based survey, beginning with non-technical survey, will provide opportunities to monitor the extent to which different groups are represented. A post clearance assessment process will also allow some opportunity to assess the extent of community participation in UXO action. UNDP will support discussions both within the Technical Working Group, NRA and the broader UXO Sector about how this should be measured and assessed. The NRA will be responsible for articulating what measure is to be used and when it will be initiated. The extent of participation and community involvement will also be included in a monitoring and evaluation framework to be developed under UNDP’s new programme.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
4.1. UNDP will support the conduct of the Technical Working Groups and will raise the issue of monitoring participation in NTS during sessions.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2017/03/13]
UXO Unit 2017/12 Completed TWGs conducted; national standards for NTS discussed. History
4.2. UNDP will support the development of a system of post-clearance assessment for monitoring purposes.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2019/06/09]
UXO Unit 2018/12 Completed Post clearance assessment has become a reduced priority due to the shift from request-based clearance to evidence-based survey/clearance (NTS,TS) History
4.3. UNDP will engage a specialist to devise a Monitoring and Evaluation framework for the UXO sector with the NRA.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2019/06/09]
UXO Unit 2018/12 Completed A dedicated staff on Monitoring and Evaluation will start in July 2019 History
5. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 5: The UNDP should support discussions within the NRA and the Survey and Clearance Technical Working Group to determine how efficiency and effectiveness of the new concept of operations will be evaluated.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/29]

Agree – The efficiency of the new Concept of Operations is currently – informally – measured on the number of cluster munitions found per hectare of land cleared. This has already demonstrated progress on that indicator. However, UNDP will provide technical inputs at the Technical Working Groups (and at the Sector Working Group) regarding other possible measures for efficiency, including global cost comparisons, and for effectiveness, including numbers of beneficiaries, stakeholder satisfaction, or consultation.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
5.1. UNDP will produce a paper with suggested indicators for CMTS effectiveness and efficiency and share it with the NRA; UNDP will also raise its suggestions at the Technical Working Group.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2019/06/09]
UXO Unit 2018/12 Completed As a result of UNDP efforts taken, bilateral donors have ensured survey workshops where potential indicators have been discussed. History
6. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 6: The UNDP should support the NRA hold quarterly operational meetings with development partners (program manager level).

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/29]

Agreed – UNDP recognizes the need for Development Partners to be informed of progress and challenges on a more regular basis than the Annual Project Board Meeting.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
6.1. UNDP will support and encourage the NRA to convene more regular meetings, and will suggest Q3 2016 for a first quarterly meeting.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2017/03/13]
UXO Unit 2017/07 Completed UNDP has encouraged NRA to have an informal DP meeting at the NRA on top of the SWG meetings and has advised to put it into the AWP 2017. History
7. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 7: The UNDP should support the NRA and UXO Lao to develop and implement an effective communication strategy, tailored to different stakeholder needs and focused on application of safeguards, outputs, inputs and progress against the capacity building workplans.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/29]

Agreed – UNDP recognizes the need for changes in the sector, most pressingly the evidence-based approach, to be clearly communicated to stakeholders (both project beneficiaries and Development Partners). The Capacity Assessment already noted communications as an area of need for both UXO Lao and NRA.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
7.1. UNDP will work with NRA and UXO Lao to articulate clear actions to follow-up on the communications needs identified in the Capacity Assessment, in line with the Key Action under Recommendation 1.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2019/06/09]
UXO Unit 2018/12 Completed Evidence based survey (NTS,TS) is fully operational by all humanitarian clearance operators. Discussion of the benefits of evidence-based survey is ongoing. History
8. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 8: The UNDP should support constructive dialog with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and development partners to determine if the Trust Fund and its Terms of Reference are still appropriate.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/29]

Partially agree – UNDP notes that the evaluation could have provided more clarity regarding the Trust Fund and its effectiveness/relevance. The issue of the Trust Fund Terms of Reference was raised at the Trust Fund Steering Committee Meeting in February 2015. The modality will continue to be discussed, particularly in light of the development of a new programme of UNDP support to the UXO sector.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
8.1. UNDP will formulate the new programme of its support to the UXO sector and then consider the relevance of the Trust Fund modality to implementing it.
[Added: 2016/05/29] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed New programme developed and shared with GoL; Trust Fund discussed History
9. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 9: The UNDP should continue to work with the NRA, the UXO Lao, and donors to ensure a coherent approach to the provision and coordination of technical advisory services.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/30]

Agree – UNDP has already begun taking a more sectoral approach in its own provision of technical advisory services, with all Technical Advisors now deployed to both NRA and UXO Lao. Since August 2015, a sectoral Chief Technical Advisor has been deployed, who already works closely with the key operators in the sector, as well as with the advisory capacities deployed bilaterally to NRA and UXO Lao from JICA and Sterling in particular.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
9.1. UNDP will continue to coordinate with the key providers of advisory support through regular meetings and information sharing.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed Regular coordination ensured through meetings and information sharing. History
10. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 10: The UNDP should support the NRA and the UXO Lao to ensure a pro-poor, gender sensitive focus including gender indicators at the output and outcome level and implementing the recent GMAP 2014 action plan and recommendations related to the 2008 gender assessment.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/30]

Agree – UNDP notes that Evaluation Recommendation 4, and the planned response, partly overlap with this Evaluation Recommendation. UNDP recognizes the need to ensure that data collection and management are enhanced in a gender-sensitive manner, with the disaggregation of all relevant data by age and gender a minimum expectation. This will apply to programme design for 2017 onwards, and will depend on the provision by the relevant Ministries of the Government of Lao PDR of necessary and adequate data. UNDP’s technical advice regarding task prioritisation includes pro-poor criteria and has been shared with the NRA for discussion.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
10.1. UNDP will review the GMAP recommendations during programme design and work to address the identified needs with the NRA and UXO Lao
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed GMAP used to inform new project design, gender mainstreaming discussed with NRA and UXO Lao and gender component included in new draft Project Document, 2017-2021. History
10.2. UNDP will continue to support and advocate for a system of task prioritisation which focuses resources in a pro-poor manner.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed See Issue 2. History
11. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 11: The UNDP should further develop the capacity of the NRA and UXO Lao in all stages of the information cycle and to develop and implement a sector monitoring and evaluation framework that articulates minimum, output and outcome indicators.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/30]

Partially Agree – UNDP recognizes the need for the NRA specifically to improve its capacity to collect and manage data at the sector level; a Capacity Assessment of the NRA for Monitoring and Evaluation has already taken place and the findings have informed a Concept Note which will form part of the new UXO Programme to start in 2017. UXO Lao’s information management also requires support but the nature of UXO Lao’s reporting requirements should be articulated by the NRA, and the delivery supported by UNDP and other providers of technical assistance.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
11.1. UNDP will engage a specialist in Monitoring and Evaluation as part of its next programme to support the NRA in articulating a sector-level framework for M+E.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2019/06/09]
UXO Unit 2018/12 Completed A dedicated staff on Monitoring and Evaluation will start in July 2019 History
11.2. UNDP will coordinate with UXO Laoâ??s other key bilateral partners to assess and address information management technical assistance needs.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed ToRs for IM staff developed and shared; coordinated with Sterling; UXO Lao Database Unit Deputy hired. IM included in new project. History
12. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 12: The UNDP should support the NRA and the UXO Lao to integrate, monitor, and report on appropriate elements of the UNDP’s recently released Social and Environmental Safeguards into their work.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/30]

Agree – UNDP recognizes the need to identify and mitigate social and environmental risks to the development impact of its work. UNDP Lao PDR is working to establish a mechanism to enhance risk analysis in the framework of the Social and Environmental Safeguards (SES). In addition, the UXO Unit is implementing the SES Screening process in the development of new projects and programmes. More specifically, UNDP is working to address the identified issue of clearance for resettlement by incorporating national data on land concessions in a suggested process for task prioritisation.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
12.1. UNDP will establish a mechanism to localize the provisions of the global SES to Lao PDR.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2019/06/09]
UNDP Lao PDR 2018/12 Completed New Project Document includes SES screening History
12.2. UNDP will incorporate SES principles in support to the design of a mechanism for task prioritisation.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed SES used as input for prioritisation and planning guidance by CTA. History
13. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 13: The UNDP should continue to support the NRA to develop a strategy to transition to increased government financing of the sector. The strategy should be agreed on by the end of 2018, with implementation commencing at the beginning of 2019.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/30]

Partially agree – UNDP recognizes that a transition strategy will be needed in the long-term, but notes that no commitment to developing such a strategy has yet been made on the part of the Government of Lao PDR, and that the ambitious time-frame in this recommendation seems to some extent arbitrary. UNDP would also note that a transition, once articulated, may be triggered not by a prescribed start-date, but by the achievement of a pre-defined indicator of progress. As such, the 2019 target may not be relevant.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
13.1. UNDP will continue to offer support for the development of a transition strategy.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed Draft transition concept drafted by CTA and shared with NRA. Long-term vision outlined by NRA at SWG2016 History
13.2. UNDP will advocate publicly for a clear transition strategy.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed UNDP advocated for clear strategy at SWG2016. History
14. Recommendation:

Evaluation Recommendation 14: The UNDP should facilitate dialogue between the NRA, Ministry of Health, and WHO, and other relevant organizations to develop an action plan to review the quality of the incident surveillance and data collection to ensure alignment with (current or planned) injury surveillance systems, the integration of epidemiological principals into the surveillance of UXO injury; and adherence to WHO’s minimal recommendation dataset for injury surveillance.

Management Response: [Added: 2016/05/30]

Agreed - UNDP recognizes the need to enable a system for victims’ surveillance that will meet the needs of the victims, while supporting the Government of Lao PDR in delivering support and ensuring treaty adherence. UNDP will continue to encourage the NRA to work with the Ministry of Health and other relevant national organisations to review the current national surveillance system and enhance the current system and adhere to WHO’s minimal recommendation dataset. UNDP will provide technical inputs at the Technical Working Groups (and at the UXO Sector Working Group) regarding other possible measures relating to the need for appropriate victims’ surveillance.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
14.1. UNDP will discuss prospects for linking UXO victim surveillance with broader disability initiatives with key actors in the health field.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2019/06/09]
UXO Unit 2018/12 Completed As a result of boarder VA discussion in the sector, a programme to support people with disabilities including UXO victims is about to be implemented. History
14.2. UNDP will advocate publically for an enhanced victimsâ?? surveillance system.
[Added: 2016/05/30] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28]
UXO Unit 2016/12 Completed Enhanced VA included in SDG18. History

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org