Evaluación del proyecto regional PAS CHACO

Evaluación del proyecto regional PAS CHACO

Completedon 7 Dec, 2017
Evaluation Plan
Planned End Date
Dec 2017
Evaluation Type
Project
Management Response
Yes
Evaluation Budget
$40,000
Summary

This report presents the findings, lessons and recommendations of the Terminal Evaluation (TE) of the GEF-UN Environment project that “Sustainable Forest Management in the Transboundary Gran Chaco Americano Ecosystem”. The project was co-implemented by UN Environment and UNDP, and executed by the governments of Argentina, Bolivia and Paraguay with the Organization of American States (OAS) providing a supportive role as regional executing agency for the UN Environment portion of the project. Project performance and impact were assessed according to criteria that included relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability, preparedness, participation and ownership among others. The evaluation field visits were conducted during October and November 2016, considering the project’s scheduled termination in December; however, the project partners decided to extend the project administratively (and programmatically in the case of Paraguay) until June 2017. Some pilot initiatives were also continuing to develop in Bolivia. As a result, some aspects of the project’s final delivery in 2017, particularly the case of Paraguay, may not be fully captured by the TE.

  • Evaluation Information
Evaluation Title
Evaluación del proyecto regional PAS CHACO
Atlas Project Number
00060839
Plan Period
Status
Completed
Type
Project
Management Response
Yes
Plan Date
28 Dec, 2017
Quality Assessment
No
Completion Date
7 Dec, 2017
Joint Programme
No
Joint Evaluation
Yes
Joint With UN Agencies
Budget
$40,000
GEF Evaluation
Yes
Expand
Expenditure
$40,000
Source of Funding
GEF
Countries
Paraguay
Comments
Yes
Expand
  • Corporate Outcome and Output

    UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021

Output 1.1. National and sub-national systems and institutions enabled to achieve structural transformation of productive capacities that are sustainable and employment - and livelihoods- intensive

1: Others

2: Poverty and MDG