- Evaluation Plan:
- 2012-2016, Viet Nam
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Project
- Planned End Date:
- 12/2015
- Completion Date:
- 12/2015
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 25,000
Mid- Term Evaluation for Strengthening Institutional Capacity for Disaster Risk Management in Viet Nam, including for Climate Change Related Risks Phase II
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TORs - MTR for Strengthening Institutional Capacity for Disaster Risk Management in Viet Nam, including for Climate Change Related Risks Phase II.doc |
tor | English | 100.50 KB | Posted | 397 |
 Final Report- MTR Evaluation for Strengthening Institutional Capacity for Disaster Risk Management in Viet Nam, including for Climate Change Related Risks Phase II.pdf |
report | English | 3001.29 KB | Posted | 741 |
| Title | Mid- Term Evaluation for Strengthening Institutional Capacity for Disaster Risk Management in Viet Nam, including for Climate Change Related Risks Phase II | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00068891 | ||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2012-2016, Viet Nam | ||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Project | ||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||
| Completion Date: | 12/2015 | ||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 12/2015 | ||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017) |
|
||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 25,000 | ||||||||
| Source of Funding: | UNDP and AusAID | ||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | MARD | ||||||||
| Countries: | VIET NAM |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | The relevance of the project design and implementation regarding capacity development to be made more visible by end of the project |
| 2 | Continue to support capacity building activities of the Disaster Management Centre (DMC) and CCFSC members to ensure the quality and sustainability of institutional arrangements around DRM |
| 3 | Continue concrete support for more effective, comprehensive, evidence-based documentation of project achievements in piloting CBDRM strategy to serve purposes of advocacy for upscaling, and long term capacity development. |
| 4 | Improve gender sensitivity and participation of vulnerable groups (in both urban and rural areas) in project?s activities and capacity-building products |
| 5 | Improve information sharing and develop communication plan for further dissemination of project achievements and lessons. |
1. Recommendation: The relevance of the project design and implementation regarding capacity development to be made more visible by end of the project
Management Response: [Added: 2015/12/31]
Agree
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Undertake a post-project capacity assessment to ascertain capacity built, to document all issues of capacity building, and to develop new/revised capacity development plan (based on identification of still remaining gaps) for post-project sustainable capacity development.
[Added: 2015/12/31] [Last Updated: 2016/10/18] |
PMU | 2016/12 | Completed | Measures for increasing capacity should be taken into consideration in the post project capacity assessment. The assessment will be done for only CCFSC/PCFSCs. Using monkey survey method for the assessment (different from UNDP?s capacity assessment method) History |
2. Recommendation: Continue to support capacity building activities of the Disaster Management Centre (DMC) and CCFSC members to ensure the quality and sustainability of institutional arrangements around DRM
Management Response: [Added: 2015/12/31]
Agee
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design a comprehensive ToT plan to ensure targeted counterparts (key departments at sub-national level) will be capable to organize training later on
[Added: 2015/12/31] [Last Updated: 2016/12/19] |
PMU | 2016/12 | Completed | 3 TOTs using comprehensive training plan/program and existing curricular will be delivered. History | |
| Develop a plan for advocating and adopting the ToT plan, for provincial implementation in the future.
[Added: 2015/12/31] [Last Updated: 2016/12/19] |
PMU | 2016/12 | Completed | A TOT training plan/program will be approved by MARD History |
3. Recommendation: Continue concrete support for more effective, comprehensive, evidence-based documentation of project achievements in piloting CBDRM strategy to serve purposes of advocacy for upscaling, and long term capacity development.
Management Response: [Added: 2015/12/31]
Agree
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document pilot studies more closely, paying close attention to process, methods, lessons learnt, effectiveness and cost, and involving IPs in the documentation process.
[Added: 2015/12/31] [Last Updated: 2016/10/18] |
PMU & CIPs | 2016/10 | Completed | There will be CBDRM good practices, process of the integration of CBDRM plan into SEDP plan at commune level documented, update training material for DRR and CCA History | |
| Develop action plans for replication by provinces, using results and lessons learnt in the completed provinces.
[Added: 2015/12/31] [Last Updated: 2016/10/18] |
PMU, NTA and ITA | 2016/10 | Completed | History | |
| Prioritizing the completion of the Financing model ?Building Block?, aiming at outlining methods for financing the implementation of CBDRM to enhance replication
[Added: 2015/12/31] [Last Updated: 2016/11/28] |
UNDP, PMU, CIPs | 2016/10 | Completed | MARD has completed the draft version of financing model. Further discussions among UNDP-NIP-CIPs for advocating the financing model to MoF and other activities to realize the recommended action. Note: There will be a risk of no financial model approved. History |
4. Recommendation: Improve gender sensitivity and participation of vulnerable groups (in both urban and rural areas) in project?s activities and capacity-building products
Management Response: [Added: 2015/12/31]
Agree
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhance gender mainstreaming through stocktaking and documentation activities, with lessons learnt on gender-specific DRM practices to be documented and used to revise relevant technical manuals accordingly
[Added: 2015/12/31] [Last Updated: 2016/10/18] |
WU | 2016/10 | Completed | Gender indicators should be made specific when activities are planned and conducted. Attention to be given to measures of gender mainstreaming improvement History |
5. Recommendation: Improve information sharing and develop communication plan for further dissemination of project achievements and lessons.
Management Response: [Added: 2015/12/31]
Agree
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To set up and conduct coordination meetings, partnership exchanges of CIPs, NIPs, relevant stakeholders, and organizations at a regular basis.
[Added: 2015/12/31] [Last Updated: 2016/12/19] |
PMU, UNDP | 2016/12 | Completed | Regular technical meeting in CBDRM and DMTWG, national DRR forum will be conducted with the involvement of DMC/SCDM II. History |