- Evaluation Plan:
- 2016-2020, China
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 12/2020
- Completion Date:
- 11/2020
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 76,000
Final Evaluations for Electronic Waste project
Share
Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
tor | English | 63.95 KB | Posted | 25 |
![]() |
tor | English | 60.58 KB | Posted | 23 |
![]() |
report | English | 1797.74 KB | Posted | 38 |
Title | Final Evaluations for Electronic Waste project | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlas Project Number: | 78105 | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Plan: | 2016-2020, China | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||||||||
Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
Completion Date: | 11/2020 | ||||||||||||||
Planned End Date: | 12/2020 | ||||||||||||||
Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
UNDP Signature Solution: |
|
||||||||||||||
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||||||
SDG Goal |
|
||||||||||||||
SDG Target |
|
||||||||||||||
Evaluation Budget(US $): | 76,000 | ||||||||||||||
Source of Funding: | Project budget | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 35,000 | ||||||||||||||
Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
Joint Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
Key Stakeholders: | Ministry of Environment | ||||||||||||||
Countries: | CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC |
Lessons | |
---|---|
Findings |
Recommendations | |
---|---|
1 | It is recommended to undertake a short but decisive final summarizing assessment on the status quo and assess the compatibility of the systems in terms of coverage of the WEEE waste streams and the management options including the treatment facilities. These final assessments can form the basis for replication in other provinces in China and can serve as a model for other countries. |
2 | It is recommended to develop a clear dissemination plan for replication including lessons learned and best practices identified during the demonstrations as well as the studies and guidelines developed. This project is a snapshot reflecting to present situation; however, the electronics market is rapidly developing also due to new requirements or trends. Any replication or expansion of the project must take into account these changes and inform suppliers for the manufacture of new electronics to allow for future ecoproducts that do not contain POPs. For the WEEE management, technologies as well as workplaces have to be reviewed with quite high frequency to take into account more modern products. |
3 | There is a need to regularly monitor the content of POPs, especially PBDEs including deca-BDE but also HBCD in the electronic product categories to ensure that contents are below the low POP content established under the Basel Convention. |
4 | Since some solutions are quite local and cover less than 100,000 people (in Wuhan, we did see one company that served 40,000 people and was technologically and For communication and trainings, performance or output indicators should be developed to assess efficiency and effectiveness of the trainings as well as needs for Trainings should focus more on outcomes (e.g. capacities being built and consequent improvements in operations) rather than outputs (e.g. numbers of trainings, |
5 | For each project, trainings to executing partners on managing GEF projects should be done in the very early stage of the project implementation (ideally starting during project |
6 | The project has identified the e-waste stream of CRTs as a resource for secondary and primary metal smelters. So far, the TE Team has not been aware that CRTs can be considered a raw material for lead smelters. Such applications, which may need special permits in certain jurisdictions should be further explored and promoted for mutual benefit |