Evaluation of Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) 2012-2016
Completedon 15 Feb, 2016
Evaluation Plan
Planned End Date
Feb 2016
Evaluation Type
Country Programme Evaluation
Management Response
Yes
Evaluation Budget
$50,000
Evaluation Title
Evaluation of Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) 2012-2016
Plan Period
Status
Completed
Type
Country Programme Evaluation
Plan Date
6 Feb, 2016
Completion Date
15 Feb, 2016
Budget
$50,000
Expenditure
$45,100
Source of Funding
UNDP Mongolia Engagement Facility
Management Response
Yes
Quality Assessment
Yes
Joint Programme
No
Joint Evaluation
No
GEF Evaluation
No
Stakeholders
Government of Mongolia, line Ministries, SCOs, development partners
Countries
Mongolia
Comments
Plan Period
Status
Completed
Type
Country Programme Evaluation
Management Response
Yes
Plan Date
6 Feb, 2016
Quality Assessment
Yes
Completion Date
15 Feb, 2016
Joint Programme
No
Joint Evaluation
No
Budget
$50,000
GEF Evaluation
No
Expenditure
$45,100
Stakeholders
Government of Mongolia, line Ministries, SCOs, development partners
Source of Funding
UNDP Mongolia Engagement Facility
Countries
Mongolia
Comments
Yes
Expand
Output 7.3. National development plans to address poverty and inequality are sustainable and risk resilient
1: Crisis Prevention & Recovery
2: Cross-cutting Development Issue
3: Democratic Governance
4: Environment & Sustainable Development
5: Others
6: Poverty and MDG
Overall findings: UNDP’s role as a trusted partner to the Government of Mongolia (GoM) on complex and politically sensitive issues of governance and development as well as its convening role creates space for engagement with the GoM on development and governance issues. Development partners see it as a unique role of UNDP. This has enabled development of various legal and policy instruments in the country, though implementation and enforcement of these lag behind. UNDP has been instrumental in developing capacity of various institutions mostly at the national level, namely: National Human Right Commission of Mongolia (NHRCM), International Think Tank for Landlocked Developing Countries (ITT-LLDC), National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and the Ministry of Finance (MoF), in particular. A key challenge in the country is to ensure focus on poverty; this will require moving away from
a conventional notion of poverty and a new construct which UNDP is now developing linking poverty and vulnerability to climate change, disaster risk reduction and overall resilience of the economy. Future programming in the areas of poverty and environment will demand ability to bring cross-thematic linkages at all levels, underpinned by a well-articulated theory of change.
With competition for resources getting tougher, it will require UNDP to demonstrate strong
comparative advantage and innovative approaches in resource mobilization.