- Evaluation Plan:
- 2017-2022, Morocco
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 03/2022
- Completion Date:
- 01/2022
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 40,000
Final Term Evaluation of the Circular Economy project
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR -TE- Projet Economie Circulaire.pdf |
tor | French | 604.27 KB | Posted | 513 |
| Economie circulaire-Terminal Evaluation Report.pdf |
report | English | 2861.14 KB | Posted | 99 |
| Title | Final Term Evaluation of the Circular Economy project | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00080094 | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2017-2022, Morocco | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
| Completion Date: | 01/2022 | ||||||||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 03/2022 | ||||||||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||||||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 40,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Source of Funding: | Project budget, GEF | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 31,710 | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||||||||||
| Countries: | MOROCCO |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluation Recommendations or Issues 1: Category 1: Validity of the project design Considering the validity of project design, it is recommended that special emphasis should be devoted to the design of future PES programmes/projects, |
| 2 | Evaluation Recommendations or Issues 2: Category 2: Institutional framework and PES governance In terms of governance and institutional framework, it would be appropriate to: (i) build on the achievements of the project, especially as regards the Commission dedicated to the management of the RBA Ecolabel; (ii) provide a framework for the coherence of the strategies of public institutions around the RBA Ecolabel (SFM, SGG, DARED, etc.); and (iii) maintain the public-private international organisations dialogue during the implementation or revision of the RBA Ecolabel standard. |
| 3 | Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 3: Category 3: Sustainability of net benefits over timeConsidering the sustainability of the net benefits and the progress towards the achievement of the impact, it is strongly recommended that the national counterpart ensures that the continuity of the CE-SM project's opportunity and its net benefits are to be continued. |
| 4 | Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 4: Category 4: Exit strategy and sustainabilityThe main axes of the exit and sustainability strategy (2021-2022) concern (i) the creation of an institutional and legal framework for PES at the national level; (ii) support to the implementation of the ASMEL RBA management plan; and (iii) support to the management of the RBA eco-label. In fact, the evaluation mission recommends the organisation of a national sharing workshop dedicated to PES in Morocco. The main objectives of this workshop are: (i) to take stock and capitalise on current PES initiatives; (ii) to discuss opportunities of institutionalising PES; and (iii) to set up the RBA Ecolabel framework agreement |
Management Response Documents
1. Recommendation:
Evaluation Recommendations or Issues 1: Category 1: Validity of the project design
Considering the validity of project design, it is recommended that special emphasis should be devoted to the design of future PES programmes/projects,
Management Response: [Added: 2022/02/07] [Last Updated: 2022/02/07]
Improve the design of future projects
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Making the intervention logic / theory of change explicit; (ii) formulating indicators in SMART mode; (iii) integrating the analysis of success assumptions and risk factors with appropriate mitigation measures; and (iv) planning the sustainability strategy for each project
[Added: 2022/02/07] |
UNDP/National partner | 2022/11 | Initiated |
2. Recommendation:
Evaluation Recommendations or Issues 2: Category 2: Institutional framework and PES governance
In terms of governance and institutional framework, it would be appropriate to: (i) build on the achievements of the project, especially as regards the Commission dedicated to the management of the RBA Ecolabel; (ii) provide a framework for the coherence of the strategies of public institutions around the RBA Ecolabel (SFM, SGG, DARED, etc.); and (iii) maintain the public-private international organisations dialogue during the implementation or revision of the RBA Ecolabel standard.
Management Response: [Added: 2022/02/07]
Support the Commission dedicated to the management of the RBA Ecolabel
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support the Commission dedicated to the management of the RBA Ecolabel
[Added: 2022/02/07] |
National Partner | 2022/12 | Initiated |
3. Recommendation:
Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 3: Category 3: Sustainability of net benefits over time
Considering the sustainability of the net benefits and the progress towards the achievement of the impact, it is strongly recommended that the national counterpart ensures that the continuity of the CE-SM project's opportunity and its net benefits are to be continued.
Management Response: [Added: 2022/02/07] [Last Updated: 2022/02/07]
Management Response:
Integrating the consolidated project results into the Green Generation Strategy (GGS, 2020-2030) and the Forestry Strategy (FGS, 2020-2030).
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discuss opportunities of institutionalising PES
[Added: 2022/02/07] |
National Partner | 2022/12 | Initiated |
4. Recommendation:
Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 4: Category 4: Exit strategy and sustainability
The main axes of the exit and sustainability strategy (2021-2022) concern (i) the creation of an institutional and legal framework for PES at the national level; (ii) support to the implementation of the ASMEL RBA management plan; and (iii) support to the management of the RBA eco-label.
In fact, the evaluation mission recommends the organisation of a national sharing workshop dedicated to PES in Morocco. The main objectives of this workshop are: (i) to take stock and capitalise on current PES initiatives; (ii) to discuss opportunities of institutionalising PES; and (iii) to set up the RBA Ecolabel framework agreement
Management Response: [Added: 2022/02/07] [Last Updated: 2022/02/07]
Ensure the sustainability and continuity of the project opportunity and its net benefits
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organisation of a national sharing workshop dedicated to PES in Morocco
[Added: 2022/02/07] |
National Partner | 2022/12 | Initiated |