- Evaluation Plan:
- 2017-2022, Montenegro
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 10/2020
- Completion Date:
- 12/2020
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 20,000
Gender programme evaluation
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 ToR Gender Programme Evaluation Final.docx |
tor | English | 51.73 KB | Posted | 1012 |
 Annex Y19 External Evaluation Report December 2019 Nataša_Milenkovic.pdf |
report | English | 491.57 KB | Posted | 4413 |
| Title | Gender programme evaluation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00085978 | ||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2017-2022, Montenegro | ||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||
| Completion Date: | 12/2020 | ||||||
| Planned End Date: | 10/2020 | ||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 20,000 | ||||||
| Source of Funding: | EU IPA | ||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 8,250 | ||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Government, CSOs, EUD | ||||||
| Countries: | MONTENEGRO |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Practice of inter-sectoral and multidisciplinary Steering Committees - should be continued in the future, and it is desirable to transfer this type of coordination and cooperation to the local level. In order to improve the operation of the SC, it is recommended to include lower ranking personnel (e.g. Heads of relevant departments) in the future, instead ministers, which is the current case. |
| 2 | Stronger involvement of relevant NGOs and end-users in the development of plans and policies at national and / or local level contributes not only to the transparency of the work of governmental bodies, but also to better and more sustainable results generated through the implementation of those plans. There is also a need to work to further empower NGOs to monitor the implementation of laws and policies in the fields of human rights, anti-discrimination and gender equality. |
| 3 | The project recognizes the importance of working with the media, in the context of the content of the articles, the tone and terminology used in the reporting, but some of the planned educational tool-kit for journalists and their training are still underway at the time of writing this report. Work with journalists, media and journalistic associations, including journalism schools (formal and informal) - on advancing terminology, ethical reporting, combating stereotypes and prejudices - should continue. |