Improvement of the decision-making process in Kazakhstan through introduction of mechanisms of economic assessment of fulfilling national obligations under global environmental agreements

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2016-2020, Kazakhstan
Evaluation Type:
Final Project
Planned End Date:
02/2018
Completion Date:
04/2018
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
25,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document TOR of CB2 Terminal Evaluation_2017_eng.pdf tor English 573.52 KB Posted 91
Download document KAZ_TE_of CB2_Final Report_eng (002).pdf report English 1321.13 KB Posted 161
Title Improvement of the decision-making process in Kazakhstan through introduction of mechanisms of economic assessment of fulfilling national obligations under global environmental agreements
Atlas Project Number: 00081775
Evaluation Plan: 2016-2020, Kazakhstan
Evaluation Type: Final Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 04/2018
Planned End Date: 02/2018
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Environment & Sustainable Development
  • 2. Others
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Output 2.5. Legal and regulatory frameworks, policies and institutions enabled to ensure the conservation, sustainable use, and access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems, in line with international conventions and national
Evaluation Budget(US $): 25,000
Source of Funding: Project
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): 17,000
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Ms. Amal Aldababseh adababseh@estidama-jo.com JORDAN
GEF Evaluation: Yes
GEF Project Title: Improvement of the decision-making process in Kazakhstan through introduction of mechanisms of economic assessment of fulfilling national obligations under global environmental agreements
Evaluation Type: Terminal Evaluation
Focal Area: Multifocal Areas
Project Type: MSP
GEF Phase: GEF-5
GEF Project ID: 5399
PIMS Number: 5248
Key Stakeholders:
Countries: KAZAKHSTAN
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1

The project holds a final workshop of stakeholders (FWC, MoA, Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Finance, local governments in piloting sites and UNDP) to map out the future of economic valuation tools.   ect holds a final workshop of stakeholders (FWC, MoA, Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Finance, local governments in piloting sites and UNDP) to map out the future of economic valuation tools.   

2

The PMU to finalize all project’s deliverables and make them available for national stakeholders who are interested in economic valuations for ecosystem services.  These deliverables can be made available online by developing a dedicated website for economic valuations of ecosystem services.

3

The PMU to prepare a summary booklet in English for the project’s deliverables and disseminate that at global level. This could be done virtually by uploading the materials into the project’s website, or through preparing a small booklet about the project, listing its main deliverables with one-two summary about each one of them. This will help in sharing lessons learned from the projects, and disseminates the results to other countries by overriding the language barrier.

4

It is recommended that the few remaining project activities be completed as soon as possible, including the booklet for awareness campaign, the approval of the amendment to the EIA.

5

Economic valuation for ecosystem services capacity presently has limitations to meet the actual needs at the Country level. The FWC should fast-track the upgrading of the national capacity in order not to meet the needed demand created under the project.

6

During the TE mission and meetings with project stakeholders, the need for clearly written guidelines and standards for economic valuations for different kind of ecosystems, including forest, wetlands, rangelands, rivers, etc., was strongly stated.  While the guidelines developed by the project are prescribed for the protected areas and forest ecosystems, other critical ecosystems should be valuated and assessed. It is therefore recommended that FWC considers introducing a system of listing all ecosystems that need to be valuated, starting from vulnerable ecosystems first, then moving to the least vulnerable ones. 

7

To ensure the availability of needed financial resources, it is recommended that all economic valuation and voluntary payments revenues be maintained at specific well-established funds like the Biodiversity funds.

1. Recommendation:

The project holds a final workshop of stakeholders (FWC, MoA, Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Finance, local governments in piloting sites and UNDP) to map out the future of economic valuation tools.   ect holds a final workshop of stakeholders (FWC, MoA, Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Finance, local governments in piloting sites and UNDP) to map out the future of economic valuation tools.   

Management Response: [Added: 2018/04/24] [Last Updated: 2018/04/24]

The final workshop of the project was held on 23 November 2017 in capital Astana with the participation of partners and key stakeholders (50 people from government agencies, social organizations, experts of national and international standing).  

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Joint demonstration of project results by UNDP, FWC and PMU
[Added: 2018/04/24]
FWC, UNDP CO, PMU 2017/12 Completed
2. Recommendation:

The PMU to finalize all project’s deliverables and make them available for national stakeholders who are interested in economic valuations for ecosystem services.  These deliverables can be made available online by developing a dedicated website for economic valuations of ecosystem services.

Management Response: [Added: 2018/04/24]

The project team has taken due account of this recommendation. As no website can be created at this stage under the CB2 project, the findings of the pilot studies have been shared with FWC so that they can be placed on their site www.fhc.kz. In addition, the project’s deliverables had been made available on the Clearing house mechanism website under Convention on Biological Diversity https://new-kz.chm-cbd.net/library and disseminated through a printed publication to the stakeholders.  

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Replication of project results
[Added: 2018/04/24]
FWC, PMU 2017/12 Completed
3. Recommendation:

The PMU to prepare a summary booklet in English for the project’s deliverables and disseminate that at global level. This could be done virtually by uploading the materials into the project’s website, or through preparing a small booklet about the project, listing its main deliverables with one-two summary about each one of them. This will help in sharing lessons learned from the projects, and disseminates the results to other countries by overriding the language barrier.

Management Response: [Added: 2018/04/24]

The project team has given due consideration to this recommendation and development of the booklet about the project’s deliverables is currently under way. As indicated in the management response 2, all available materials were posted on websites.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Preparation of a booklet about the project’s deliverables for 2014-2017
[Added: 2018/04/24]
PMU 2017/12 Completed
4. Recommendation:

It is recommended that the few remaining project activities be completed as soon as possible, including the booklet for awareness campaign, the approval of the amendment to the EIA.

Management Response: [Added: 2018/04/24]

On 17 November 2017 a roundtable was held with representatives from FWC, UNDP, government of Mangystau region, oil and gas companies. The meeting was dedicated to the EIA and introduction of biodiversity offsets in site Kansu. During the discussions, participants highlighted the importance of the amendments to the EIA. The amendments were included in the resolution of the roundtable and sent to the Ministry of Energy of Kazakhstan, the Ministry of Agriculture, government of Mangystau region, KazTransGaz JSC  in order to expedite the process of legislative changes.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Action to make amendments to the Environmental Code, the Law on Mineral Resources and Their Exploitation, the instruction on performance of the EIA
[Added: 2018/04/24]
FWC 2017/12 Completed
5. Recommendation:

Economic valuation for ecosystem services capacity presently has limitations to meet the actual needs at the Country level. The FWC should fast-track the upgrading of the national capacity in order not to meet the needed demand created under the project.

Management Response: [Added: 2018/04/24]

FWC has taken due account of this recommendation of the international expert. FWC is considering the inclusion of economic valuation of ecosystem services in the system of cadastral valuation of forest resources, fish resources and wildlife resources to build the legal basis. The results of the changes will be reflected in Kazakhstan’s 6th national report to the Convention on Biodiversity.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Approval of amendments to the rules on the management of the cadaster of land resources, fish resources and wildlife resources
[Added: 2018/04/24]
FWC 2018/04 Completed
6. Recommendation:

During the TE mission and meetings with project stakeholders, the need for clearly written guidelines and standards for economic valuations for different kind of ecosystems, including forest, wetlands, rangelands, rivers, etc., was strongly stated.  While the guidelines developed by the project are prescribed for the protected areas and forest ecosystems, other critical ecosystems should be valuated and assessed. It is therefore recommended that FWC considers introducing a system of listing all ecosystems that need to be valuated, starting from vulnerable ecosystems first, then moving to the least vulnerable ones. 

Management Response: [Added: 2018/04/24]

This is a valuable advice to Government of Kazakhstan in the context of transition to green economy. FWC will suggest that identification of ecosystem services and their economic valuations should be a part of management plans of protected areas.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Inclusion of the studies on the identification of ecosystem services and their economic valuations in management plans of protected areas
[Added: 2018/04/24]
FWC, protected areas 2018/04 Completed
7. Recommendation:

To ensure the availability of needed financial resources, it is recommended that all economic valuation and voluntary payments revenues be maintained at specific well-established funds like the Biodiversity funds.

Management Response: [Added: 2018/04/24]

On the recommendations of UNDP-supported biodiversity projects implemented in collaboration with FWC, the potential for generation and operationalization of financial resources through the Biodiversity Conservation Fund of Kazakhstan (BCFK)  is being explored. Key instruments are tax incentives for development of ecotourism and hunting concessions, where BCFK has the potential to be a financial agent.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Initiating the amendments to the Tax Code of Kazakhstan to ensure that investments and financial resources are earmarked for biodiversity
[Added: 2018/04/24]
FWC, BCFK, PMU 2018/04 Completed

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org