Vanuatu CB2/CCCD

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2018-2022, Fiji
Evaluation Type:
Final Project
Planned End Date:
09/2020
Completion Date:
09/2020
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
20,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document UNDP-GEF-Terminal-Evaluation-Terms-of-Reference-Vanuatu CB2.pdf tor English 411.23 KB Posted 70
Download document Vanuatu CB2 Evaluation - Final.pdf report English 3779.78 KB Posted 137
Title Vanuatu CB2/CCCD
Atlas Project Number: 88732
Evaluation Plan: 2018-2022, Fiji
Evaluation Type: Final Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 09/2020
Planned End Date: 09/2020
Management Response: Yes
UNDP Signature Solution:
  • 1. Sustainable
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021)
  • 1. Output 2.3.1 Data and risk-informed development policies, plans, systems and financing incorporate integrated and gender-responsive solutions to reduce disaster risks, enable climate change adaptation and mitigation, and prevent risk of conflict
SDG Goal
  • Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
SDG Target
  • 14.5 By 2020, conserve at least 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, consistent with national and international law and based on the best available scientific information
Evaluation Budget(US $): 20,000
Source of Funding: GEF Trust Fund
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): 10,990
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Anna Hartman Team Leader anna.hartman@hotmail.com
GEF Evaluation: Yes
GEF Project Title: Mainstreaming Global Environmental Priorities into National Policies and Programmes
Evaluation Type: Terminal Evaluation
Focal Area: Multifocal Areas
Project Type: MSP
GEF Phase: GEF-5
GEF Project ID: 5655
PIMS Number: 5051
Key Stakeholders: Department of Environment & Conservation, Ministry of Land and Natural Resources (DEC/MLNR)
Countries: FIJI
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1

Future project planning should rather be based on the focus on strengths and opportunities in a country rather than on gaps and weaknesses, which could be counter-productive. Particularly ongoing initiatives related to the outcomes of a project should be strengthened above all.Future project planning should rather be based on the focus on strengths and opportunities in a country rather than on gaps and weaknesses, which could be counter-productive. Particularly ongoing initiatives related to the outcomes of a project should be strengthened above all.

2

Before hiring external consultants, it should be screened carefully, if national capacities are not sufficient to fulfil the envisaged tasks.

3

The EIMS system should be renewed with the help of national IT staff, who should also take care of migrating all data in the current EIMS system to the new one

4

The Initiative by the Geospatial User Group should be strengthened also in future and accommodate the efforts of establishing the EIMS at DEPC with related staff

5

Future projects should rather focus on empowerment and strengthening management and coordination

6

UNDP should devote more care to support projects with its international experience and should abandon its top-down approach

1. Recommendation:

Future project planning should rather be based on the focus on strengths and opportunities in a country rather than on gaps and weaknesses, which could be counter-productive. Particularly ongoing initiatives related to the outcomes of a project should be strengthened above all.Future project planning should rather be based on the focus on strengths and opportunities in a country rather than on gaps and weaknesses, which could be counter-productive. Particularly ongoing initiatives related to the outcomes of a project should be strengthened above all.

Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/05]

Recommendation acknowledged.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
The department of environment will work closely with UNDP to ensure that future project of CB will docus on strength and opporutnities in Vanuatu. More consultation will be conducted in country with key stakeholders to ensure that strengthen and opporutnities are well explored. This will be dependent on opportunity for funding CB3.
[Added: 2020/12/06]
Department of Environment and UNDP 2020/09 Completed At the moment it is not possible to develop a follow -up project (CB3) since GEF has not made funding available for cross cutting capacity development in the recent funding windown. This will need to revisit in the next funding cycle.
2. Recommendation:

Before hiring external consultants, it should be screened carefully, if national capacities are not sufficient to fulfil the envisaged tasks.

Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/05]

Recommendation acknowledged.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Before hiring external consultants, it should be screened carefully, if national capacity are not sufficient to fulfill the envisaged tasks
[Added: 2020/12/06]
Department of Environment 2021/01 No Longer Applicable [Justification: Recommendation acknowledged.]
The opportunity for CB3 is still in question however should there be an opportunity, the identified action will be strongly supported by UNDP.
3. Recommendation:

The EIMS system should be renewed with the help of national IT staff, who should also take care of migrating all data in the current EIMS system to the new one

Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/05]

PMU accepts that current system is outdated and will work with the OGCIO to ensure that recommendation is executed

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
The EMIS system should be renewed with the help of national IT staff who should also take care of migrating all data in the current EIMS system to the new one.
[Added: 2020/12/06]
Department of Environment, OGCIO all stakeholders 2021/12 Initiated There needs to be a wider consultation between DEPC, VNSO, OGCIO and other stakeholders on this issue.
4. Recommendation:

The Initiative by the Geospatial User Group should be strengthened also in future and accommodate the efforts of establishing the EIMS at DEPC with related staff

Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/05]

DEPC Structure to include staffs who will be capable of managing the new EMIS system at DEPC

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
DEPC structure to include staffs who will be capable of managing the new EMIS system at DEPC. The NGDP has a national geospatial data committee
[Added: 2020/12/06]
Department of Environment 2021/12 Initiated DEPC has a new structure in place but still pending approval from the Public Service Commission as all recruitments are on halt due to COVID19
5. Recommendation:

Future projects should rather focus on empowerment and strengthening management and coordination

Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/05]

PMU acknowledges recommendation as this should help with future project for better management and coordination of activities.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Future projects should rather focus on empowerment and strengthening management and coordination
[Added: 2020/12/06]
Department of Environment 2021/12 No Longer Applicable [Justification: Under consideration for future projects]
6. Recommendation:

UNDP should devote more care to support projects with its international experience and should abandon its top-down approach

Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/05]

Recommendation acknowledged

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
UNDP should devote more care to support projects with its international experience and should abandon its top down approach
[Added: 2020/12/06]
UNDP 2020/09 Completed Discussed with RTA opportunity for CB3

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org