Projet de renforcement du rôle de conservation du système national d’aires protégées au Togo

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2014-2018, Togo
Evaluation Type:
Final Project
Planned End Date:
12/2018
Completion Date:
10/2018
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
20,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document ToR - Protected Area MTR-TE-ThematicLearningReview v4_July3 (002).docx tor English 97.05 KB Posted 36
Download document Evaluation Finale du projet PRAPT_PIMS-4220-TE_Report_final.pdf report French 2326.92 KB Posted 20
Title Projet de renforcement du rôle de conservation du système national d’aires protégées au Togo
Atlas Project Number: 00060926
Evaluation Plan: 2014-2018, Togo
Evaluation Type: Final Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 10/2018
Planned End Date: 12/2018
Management Response: Yes
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021)
  • 1. Output 1.4.1 Solutions scaled up for sustainable management of natural resources, including sustainable commodities and green and inclusive value chains
Evaluation Budget(US $): 20,000
Source of Funding:
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): 18,500
Joint Programme: No
Mandatory Evaluation: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Dominique ROBY International Consultant dominique.roby@gmail.com
GEF Evaluation: Yes
GEF Project Title: Projet de renforcement du rôle de conservation du système national d’aires protégées au Togo
Evaluation Type: Terminal Evaluation
Focal Area: Biodiversity
Project Type: FSP
GEF Phase: GEF-4
GEF Project ID: 4026
PIMS Number: 4220
Key Stakeholders:
Countries: TOGO
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1

The STA, the project manager and the UNDP CO should prepare the ToRs based on the specifications provided in the project document and have them validated by experts, at least by persons able to assess rigorously the consistency of the content and conditions of execution, including level of effort, resources allocated and duration, including the RTA and local specialists. These TORs should be circulated and validated by the PSC and advertised as broadly as possible. If the TORs are not developed within a short delay, the PSC as the supervisory structure should be vigilant and rapidly inquire about the reasons and take action.

1. Recommendation:

The STA, the project manager and the UNDP CO should prepare the ToRs based on the specifications provided in the project document and have them validated by experts, at least by persons able to assess rigorously the consistency of the content and conditions of execution, including level of effort, resources allocated and duration, including the RTA and local specialists. These TORs should be circulated and validated by the PSC and advertised as broadly as possible. If the TORs are not developed within a short delay, the PSC as the supervisory structure should be vigilant and rapidly inquire about the reasons and take action.

Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/28]

The delay incured was due to some communication issues with national counterparts. This recommendation is well noted and will be dealt with in future projects.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Better preparation, validation by experts and timely circulation of ToRs.
[Added: 2018/11/28]
STA and Project Manager 2019/06 Not Initiated

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

220 East 42nd Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org