- Evaluation Plan:
- 2016-2020, Turkey
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Project
- Planned End Date:
- 07/2020
- Completion Date:
- 07/2020
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 26,500
Mid-term Evaluation of Promoting EE Motors in SMEs
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Energy Efficient Motors Mid-Term Evaluation ToR.pdf |
tor | English | 463.23 KB | Posted | 1084 |
| EE Motors MTR Report_FINAL.pdf |
report | English | 1263.18 KB | Posted | 1092 |
| Title | Mid-term Evaluation of Promoting EE Motors in SMEs | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00089899 | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2016-2020, Turkey | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Project | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
| Completion Date: | 07/2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 07/2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||||||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 26,500 | ||||||||||||||
| Source of Funding: | Project budget | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 17,500 | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Directorate of General Productivity under MInistry of Science Industry and Technology | ||||||||||||||
| Countries: | TURKEY | ||||||||||||||
| Comments: | Final Evaulation is planned to be conducted in July 2022. |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Recommendation 1 – Hire a consultant in order to refocus work on setting up one-stop shop mechanism with TurSEFF and/or OIZs |
| 2 | Recommendation 2 – Extend project timeline with a request for +18 months extension no later than mid-2021 |
| 3 | Recommendation 3 – Initiate discussions with KOSGEB on replication phase |
| 4 | Recommendation 4 – Ensure correct and appropriate monitoring of direct project impacts |
| 5 | Recommendation 5 – Improve cooperation with EMOSAD with frequent meetings and consider signing an MoU for cooperation |
| 6 | Recommendation 6 – Replace co-financing of GAMAK with the goal of making sure that co-financing ratio of at least 7-1 is met |
| 7 | Recommendation 7 – Improve frequency and contents of Project Board meetings by organizing a minimum of 3 Project Board meetings per year or one per 4 months |
| 8 | Recommendation 8 – Improve TEVMOT website |
Management Response Documents
1. Recommendation:
Recommendation 1 – Hire a consultant in order to refocus work on setting up one-stop shop mechanism with TurSEFF and/or OIZs
Management Response: [Added: 2020/09/15] [Last Updated: 2020/10/06]
Refocusing on setting up one-stop shop mechanism and working on financial mechanism as soon as possible will be realized by existing team composed of Local Finance Consultant, and international CTA due to effectiveness and efficiency purposes. Both consultants’ work plan will be revised and include new tasks focusing on using private sector funding or funding through IFIs for implementing motor replacements.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A work plan detailed for both consultants with set of service requests is prepared and approved.
[Added: 2020/10/06] |
GDSRP Project team, PIU | 2020/10 | Completed |
2. Recommendation:
Recommendation 2 – Extend project timeline with a request for +18 months extension no later than mid-2021
Management Response: [Added: 2020/09/15] [Last Updated: 2020/10/06]
A 18-months extension is already considered and necessary actions to be taken by the project management unit to submit a request for extension to GEF in order to finalize all remaining activities and ensure longer-term sustainability of the project. The necessity of the extension is also discussed with the beneficiary and the decision for the extension by the steering committee will be taken in the next steering committee meeting.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Necessary documents and applications will be prepared and sent to the related bodies of UNDP and GEF to extend the project duration.
[Added: 2020/10/06] [Last Updated: 2022/06/06] |
UNDP CO, PIU | 2022/05 | Completed | Documentation was completed in May and the extension of 18 months of the project has been approved (revised formal closure is 6th January, 2024) History |
3. Recommendation:
Recommendation 3 – Initiate discussions with KOSGEB on replication phase
Management Response: [Added: 2020/09/15] [Last Updated: 2020/10/06]
Discussion on the replication phase and the role of KOSGEB are already initiated at the highest level, i.e. Ministry and RR level, in August 2020. The project needs to finish successfully the motor replacement process in at least 2 OIZs to motivate KOSGEB for the replication phase.
A detailed discussion will be undertaken specifically on replication, following motor replacements in at least 2 OIZs, with KOSGEB team. Discussions will include reducing grant contribution (subject to the KOSGEB regulations), and financing or co-financing audit costs for SMEs.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A meeting at the highest level organized.
A meeting with KOSGEB will be requested.
[Added: 2020/10/06] [Last Updated: 2021/12/28] |
UNDP CO, GDSRP, PIU | 2021/12 | Completed | A high level meeting with KOSGEB was concluded in December 2021. In January 2021, the agreement with EE Motors project and KOSGEB will be an annex to the organization's "New Productivity Program Principles and Procedures". As part of an RPA to be initiated in the first quarter of 2022, the advance payment to KOSGEB will take place. In this way, the project will be engrained in the productivity framework of KOSGEB at national scale. History |
4. Recommendation:
Recommendation 4 – Ensure correct and appropriate monitoring of direct project impacts
Management Response: [Added: 2020/09/15] [Last Updated: 2020/10/07]
Data regarding the baseline electricity consumption and operational characteristics of electric motors at selected SMEs have been collected.
Development of an MRV system will also be included to measure the actual energy savings and associated GHG reductions in some selected SMEs by the help of EMUs.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1) Collection of information on the baseline electricity consumption and operational characteristics of electric motors at selected SMEs
2) Preparation of MRV plans in some selected SMEs
3) Measurement of actual energy saving at some selected SMEs following the installation of efficient motors.
[Added: 2020/10/07] [Last Updated: 2022/06/06] |
GDSRP, PIU | 2022/05 | Completed | Completed: These are already completed by the conducted energy audits for pilot phase SMEs. History |
5. Recommendation:
Recommendation 5 – Improve cooperation with EMOSAD with frequent meetings and consider signing an MoU for cooperation
Management Response: [Added: 2020/09/15] [Last Updated: 2020/10/07]
Based on the recommendations to maintain and improve the quality of energy and GHG data from EMOSAD and other sources will be maintained by the Directorate General of Strategic Researches and Productivity (GDSRP).
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1) GDSRP Project Team and Project Implementation Unit will closely follow-up the process and provide necessary support in order to ensure the recommendations to be implemented. In order to ensure more active involvement of EMOSAD in project activities and improve data collection environment, collaboration with EMOSAD will be improved.
2) Develop interactive communication line with each EMOSAD member companies and remind their contribution responsibilities by means of MoIT lobbying.
[Added: 2020/10/07] [Last Updated: 2020/12/17] |
GDSRP, PIU | 2020/12 | Completed | Broad coordination online meeting was held in 20th November 2020 with the participation of DGSRP, General Manager, Head of Department, PMU and 9-member motor manufacturing company representatives. Active involvement of EMOSAD in project activities and improve data collection based on an Activity Plan to be prepared. PMU, DSRP experts and EMOSAD team met in 14th December 2020 to settle the common activity plan. History |
6. Recommendation:
Recommendation 6 – Replace co-financing of GAMAK with the goal of making sure that co-financing ratio of at least 7-1 is met
Management Response: [Added: 2020/09/15] [Last Updated: 2020/10/07]
GAMAK is one of the major domestic motor manufacturers having a considerable share in domestic market, therefore it is considered to be a better option to take action to include GAMAK in the project activities. Inclusion of GAMAK in the project activities will be maintained through meetings with participation of PIU, GDSRP, and EMOSAD.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| An ad-hoc meeting will be scheduled to reactivate participation of GAMAK in project activities in line with their co-finance commitments relating to development of governance and information infrastructure, continuation of investments for producing efficient electric motors, development and delivery of detailed training for manufacturers etc.
[Added: 2020/10/07] [Last Updated: 2020/12/17] |
GDSRP, PIU | 2020/12 | Completed | Since August 2020 when new DSRP GM was on board, relations with GAMAK has been improved and GAMAK has participated and contributed the Project activities as well as other Project share holder motor companies. History |
7. Recommendation:
Recommendation 7 – Improve frequency and contents of Project Board meetings by organizing a minimum of 3 Project Board meetings per year or one per 4 months
Management Response: [Added: 2020/09/15] [Last Updated: 2020/10/07]
Three Project Board meetings will be carried out annually, next one to be held in October 2020 as recommended, in order to pave the way for a more strategic forward-looking discussions where ways to achieve end of project targets are discussed.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invitation to Project Board meeting will be issued in September 2020, with an online platform. Key experts and consultants will be available in the meeting. PB meeting decisions will include to hold PB meetings in every quarter of following year.
[Added: 2020/10/07] |
UNDP CO, GDSRP, PIU | 2020/10 | Completed |
8. Recommendation:
Recommendation 8 – Improve TEVMOT website
Management Response: [Added: 2020/09/15] [Last Updated: 2020/10/07]
TEVMOT project website will be improved to fill up sections with good and meaningful information.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All sections of the web site will be filled up with good and meaningful information. A section for downloading reports will be included. A social media flow will be prepared and disseminated. A English version will be prepared with brief information to disseminate results and increase cooperation with other motor projects.
[Added: 2020/10/07] [Last Updated: 2020/12/17] |
PIU | 2020/12 | Completed | Pls. see www.tevmot.org.tr History |