| Commissioning Unit: | Nepal |
|---|---|
| Evaluation Plan: | 2018-2022 |
| Evaluation Type: | Project |
| Completion Date: | 10/2020 |
| Unit Responsible for providing Management Response: | Nepal
|
| Documents Related to overall Management Response: |
|
Key Action Update History
Municipalities should support to those households with priority who could not complete reconstruction on time and help them release of pending installments.
Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/16]
Recommendation is well received. UNDP will initiate follow-up discussions with the local municipalities to understand current status to facilitate the reconstruction process.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Meeting with local municipalities organized
[Added: 2020/12/16] [Last Updated: 2021/05/02] |
CDRMP team | 2021/05 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: UNDP does not have any project engagement in these districts since then the project was phased out. Due to our absence in the municipalities, disengagement since then on the reconstruction issues there, and finally to not raise expectations that we cannot meet without any project engagement, this action is no longer applicable.] History |
Future disaster risk management plan of the municipalities needs to include disaster preparedness and response including responding to health crisis such as COVID-19 pandemic
Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/16]
Recommendation is well received. Priorities of health crisis to be internalized in future disaster risk management plan for local levels. UNDP will consider this recommendation if there will be similary project in future.
Key Actions:
Existing insurance policy for newly reconstructed houses need to be revisited to allow direct payment of premium by the municipality on behalf of the vulnerable population for the entire policy period.
Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/16]
Well noted. As per Nepal Insurance Board regulation, house insurance premium can only be paid for a single year.
Key Actions:
Good practices, innovative approaches successfully applied in the project and lesson learnt such as provision of revolving fund, insurance for newly reconstructed houses, model of inclusive and resilient recovery beyond housing, livelihood recovery of landless households should be documented and widely disseminated.
Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/16]
Recommendation is well noted. Project will document and disseminate the such cases and success stories with NRA.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 Good practices and lesson learned disseminated
[Added: 2020/12/16] [Last Updated: 2021/05/02] |
CDRMP team | 2021/04 | Completed | Lessons learned and good practices have been disseminated through article – “Inclusion of the poor and vulnerable: Learning from post-earthquake housing reconstruction in Nepal” via NRA and UNDP website. History |
Many of agriculture-based and non-agriculture-based livelihood recovery activities supported by the project are not mature enough, for which the programme municipalities should commit their future support to the communities.
Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/16]
Well received. However, with no field presence we will be unable to follow-up.
Key Actions:
For better coherence, NGO partners should keep the space of collaboration with other I/NGOs and private sector actors while developing proposals.
Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/16]
Well noted and will be considered during future project design.
Key Actions:
The project, NGO and NRA staff need further capacity development activities to internalize the GESI perspective.
Management Response: [Added: 2020/12/16]
Well noted. There is no plan to have similar future project. If that happens, it will be considered.
Key Actions: