Success message
error message
warn message
LSDS - Assistant for implementation of Vietnam's legal system development strategy
Commissioning Unit: Viet Nam
Evaluation Plan: 2006-2011
Evaluation Type: Project
Completion Date: 11/2008
Unit Responsible for providing Management Response: Viet Nam
Documents Related to overall Management Response:
 
1. Recommendation: The LSDS Steering Committee never materialized made it difficult for cooperation between state institutions and coordinated management of the LSDS
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Resolve the issue of project over-ambition and over-burden of the MOJ management through careful definition of tasks and outputs in a future phase/project if any mechanism and the promulgation of the action plan
[Added: 2009/07/23]
MOJ and UNDP 2009/06 Completed
2. Recommendation: The unrealistic assumptions on attainable outcomes in the project document, made it difficult to promote cooperation between justice institutions under the LSDS and to some extent the JRS
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Future project/cooperation should be simplified, plans should be realistic avoiding too ambitious but meeting development needs
[Added: 2009/07/23]
MOJ and UNDP 2009/07 Completed
3. Recommendation: Over ambition in term of policy issues and over burdensome in relation to the coordination across government institutions
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Future interventions/project should focus on a few, key required policy change rather than focus too broadly or substitute for local costs
[Added: 2009/07/23]
PMU 2009/03 Completed
4. Recommendation: Project management procedures appears to be cumbersome, especially on management of sub-components outside MOJ umbrella
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Partly agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Project responsibilities for management of sub-components should be delegated to the participating sub-components with a clear and transparent mechanism for finance, M&E and reporting
[Added: 2009/07/23]
MOJ and UNDP 2009/07 Completed The issue will be well taken not only to a new MOIJ-UNDP project but any future programming
5. Recommendation: The mismatch between "sectoral" ambition of the project and mandate of the MOJ/PMU
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Priorities for future cooperation should be streamlined and in line with MOJ mandate and Government priorities
[Added: 2009/07/23]
UNDP and PMU 2009/07 Completed
6. Recommendation: Lack of follow-up or systematic evaluation of training activities
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Partly agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Difficulties to follow-up when the project is coming to an end; future intervention should be selective in themes and localities for training
[Added: 2009/07/23]
PMU 2009/03 Completed
7. Recommendation: The project to be closed as planned with a possible period of phasing out of on-going sub-components
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
The project is closed Dec 2008 with an extension of several months for phasing out
[Added: 2009/07/23] [Last Updated: 2010/01/19]
PMU and UNDP 2010/01 Completed The bridging period is agreed to be 31 Oct. 2009.
8. Recommendation: The use of funding facilities is downplayed or removed and replaced with rolling annual plans overseen by a governance body
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
The recommendation is fully taken in formulation of future project with MOJ
[Added: 2009/07/23]
PMU and UNDP 2009/07 Completed
9. Recommendation: Legal Partnership Forum is maintained and strengthened
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Agree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Annual LPF is strengthened and opened for wider participation including non-state organizations, CSOs
[Added: 2009/07/23]
PMU and UNDP 2009/06 Completed Annual LPF of the 2009 was held on 25 June 2009.
10. Recommendation: Technical assessment to be conducted of one or two training processes completed under the project
Management Response: [Added: 2009/07/23]

Partly disagree

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
With the project coming to an end, adhoc assessment of one-two activities would not add much value. However, it is well taken in formulation of new project
[Added: 2009/07/23]
PMU & UNDP 2009/06 Completed

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org