| Commissioning Unit: | DPR Korea |
|---|---|
| Evaluation Plan: | 2011-2019 |
| Evaluation Type: | Project |
| Completion Date: | 12/2017 |
| Unit Responsible for providing Management Response: | DPR Korea
|
| Documents Related to overall Management Response: |
|
Key Action Update History
Re-assess UNIDO’s ability to deliver against assigned tasks/outputs
Management Response: [Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/11]
Accepted
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1. Request UNIDO to provide required reports and especially plan for remaining months of the project duration
[Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/21] |
CO | 2017/12 | Completed | History | |
| 1.2. Assess the feasibility of UNIDO completing its component within the timeframe
[Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/21] |
SED team/CO | 2017/12 | Completed | History |
Revise agreement with UNIDO to re-focus its role in provision of international technical expertise
Management Response: [Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/11]
Accepted
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1. Take a strategic decision for the based on reports and plans received from UNIDO
[Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/21] |
CO/BRH | 2017/12 | Completed | History | |
| 2.2. Jointly amend or unilaterally terminate the agreement between two parties
[Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/21] |
SED team, CO, BRH | 2017/12 | Completed | Amendment of the partnership to be shared with UNIDO for approval by EB History |
Adopt more local procurement for higher speed, lower cost, and longer sustainability of the project
Management Response: [Added: 2017/12/11]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 Consider procuring goods and services in country when cost-effective, advisable and appropriate whilst considering CO’s funds availability in country, and expedite both national and international procurement
[Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/21] |
SED team, CO | 2017/12 | Completed | 2018 procurement plan took this into account History |
Exploit every opportunity for accelerating procurement whilst ensuring compliance
Management Response: [Added: 2017/12/11]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 Review characteristics and specifications of different goods and services, to decide appropriate means of procurement, and systematically review procurement options
[Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/21] |
SED team/CO | 2017/12 | Completed | 2018 procurement plan took into account this recommendation History |
Seek government’s support in replicating SED’s successful models (Pistia currently) within or outside target counties possibly through PSC
Management Response: [Added: 2017/12/11]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 Present the recommendation for replication within or outside current target counties to PSC meeting for support
[Added: 2017/12/11] |
SED team | 2017/12 | Completed | ||
| 5.2 Encourage local governments of SED pilot counties in planning and implementing for SED’s successful model e.g. Pistia introduction
[Added: 2017/12/11] |
SED team | 2017/12 | Completed |
Carry out internal reviews and identify most feasible activities with biggest impacts on improving people’s lives
Management Response: [Added: 2017/12/11]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.1 Review and repackage project activities based on HQ’s decisions with regard to the future of the CPD, project, funding, etc.
[Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/21] |
SED team, CO, BRH | 2017/12 | Completed | Q4/2017 PSC meeting endorsed, to be implemented in 2018 History |
Re-assess planned intervention to solve issue of limited energy supply by different means appropriate incl. synergy with SES project
Management Response: [Added: 2017/12/11]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.1. The assessment is ongoing and appropriate means are always tried in the course of project implementation including planned joint efforts with SES project
[Added: 2017/12/11] [Last Updated: 2017/12/21] |
SED team | 2017/12 | Completed | 2018 work plan took into account this recommendation and to be implemented History |