Success message
error message
warn message
Evaluation of support to mobile court arrangements in post-conflict situations
Commissioning Unit: Bureau for Policy and Programme Support
Evaluation Plan: 2009-2013
Evaluation Type: Thematic
Completion Date: 05/2014
Unit Responsible for providing Management Response: Bureau for Policy and Programme Support
Documents Related to overall Management Response:
 
1. Recommendation: Recommendation 1: UNDP should ensure that mobile courts are recognized in the national legislation and eventually provide technical assistance to strengthen the legal framework for mobile justice initiatives.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/02/14] [Last Updated: 2014/12/05]

UNDP recognizes the positive contribution of mobile courts arrangements to access to justice, and that the lack of supportive national strategies and legislation are negatively impacting on the future sustainability of the mobile court system.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
1.1 Ensure that new proposals supporting mobile courts arrangements include the support for development or update of relevant provisions in the national legislation
[Added: 2014/02/14] [Last Updated: 2015/06/26]
BCPR 2015/12 Completed Relevant provisions are included in the design of new proposals.
2. Recommendation: Recommendation 2: UNDP should establish a strong baseline to define the mobile court model most appropriate for each context (i.e. circuit courts, ad hoc mobile courts or a combination of both). Areas to be assessed include: the recurrence and typology of crimes and disputes in each judicial district; the mapping of justice and security actors in remote locations, with a special attention to verify that when judges travel on circuit, activities in home courts are not suspended because of lack of staff.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/02/14]

Based on the findings of the BCPR?s Portfolio Review, UNDP recognized the need to undertake solid contextual analyses in the process of designing new programmes. Special emphasis will be made to ensure that specific analysis is undertaken in defining appropriate mobile court models in relevant rule of law interventions.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
2.1 Ensure that the design of new mobile court interventions are informed by the analysis of the institutional and legal framework, and mapping of justice and security sector actors
[Added: 2014/02/14] [Last Updated: 2015/06/26]
BCPR, RBx, BDP (engaging DPA and DPKO) 2015/12 Completed The design of new interventions incorporate analysis and baseline information on institutional and legal framework.
3. Recommendation: Recommendation 3: UNDP should promote partnerships with other international organizations by either ensuring that 1) all the components of a mobile court intervention are addressed with the contribution of each partner in accordance to their mandate and comparative advantage or 2) by geographically dividing the area of intervention in order to ensure that mobile courts have the widest coverage possible on the territory of the State.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/02/14] [Last Updated: 2014/12/05]

In line with the concept of the Global Focal Point for Police, Justice and Corrections Areas in the Rule of Law in Post-conflict and other Crisis Situations, the UNDP recognizes the importance of the "Delivery as one" principles by the United Nations in crisis and conflict settings. In addition, the UNDP will continue to strengthen outreach and partnerships with other international organizations in support of the access to justice programmes.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
3.1 Assess and clarify, as part of project formulation, the partnership development and resource mobilization roles of UNDP and other international organizations, based on their respective comparative advantages in the area concerned.
[Added: 2014/02/14] [Last Updated: 2014/12/05]
BCPR, RBx, BDP (engaging DPA and DPKO) 2015/12 Completed As part of the Global Focal Point, partnerships and joint programming in support of rule of law programmes, including mobile court interventions, are established wherever feasible and most efficient.
4. Recommendation: Recommendation 4: Encourage mobile courts to dedicate special attention to GBV cases, without adopting the gender mobile court model.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/02/14] [Last Updated: 2014/02/14]

The UNDP recognizes the need to ensure that special focus is placed on SGBV cases in relevant access to justice programmes

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
4.1 Promote special measures in support of protections mechanisms for SGBV survivors in court proceedings and train judges and judicial staff on the promotion of women's rights and the prosecution of SGBV cases
[Added: 2014/02/14] [Last Updated: 2015/06/26]
BCPR, BDP 2015/12 Completed In line with its policy of allocating at least 15% of the project budget for gender-related activities, the BCPR ensured (up to end-September 2014) that new proposals include specific provisions for protection of SGBV survivors and training on women?s rights issues.

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org