Commissioning Unit: | Kosovo |
---|---|
Evaluation Plan: | 2016-2020 |
Evaluation Type: | Project |
Completion Date: | 08/2017 |
Unit Responsible for providing Management Response: | Kosovo
|
Documents Related to overall Management Response: |
|
Key Action Update History
Continue to contribute to institutional development by focusing on enhancing the institutional legitimacy
Management Response: [Added: 2017/09/15]
Management takes note of the recommendation. The project was developed within the existing wider CDF concept thus institutional development was integrated into project activities
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
This recommendation will be taken into consideration when designing the follow-up project or other projects contributing to the same outcome
[Added: 2017/09/15] [Last Updated: 2021/01/12] |
Programme Team | 2020/12 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: This is no longer applicable as the office was not able to mobilize resources for follow up interventions.] This is no longer applicable as the office was not able to mobilize resources for follow up interventions. History |
Continue support to improving civil service training and career development system
Management Response: [Added: 2017/09/15]
Management takes note of the recommendation. UNDP will coordinate efforts, in support of KIPA, with other partners/donors who are active in this field
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
This recommendation will be taken into consideration when implementing a potential new project or other projects contributing to the same outcome
[Added: 2017/09/15] [Last Updated: 2021/01/12] |
Project Staff | 2020/12 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: This is no longer applicable as the office was not able to mobilize resources for follow up interventions.] History |
Continue with providing on-the-job and on-demand technical assistance and mentoring – and strengthen performance criteria
Management Response: [Added: 2017/09/15]
Management takes note of the recommendation. The project was developed within the broader concept of CDF thus this activity was an integral part of the project
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
This recommendation will be implemented when designing the follow-up project or other projects contributing to the same outcome
[Added: 2017/09/15] [Last Updated: 2021/01/12] |
Programme Team | 2020/12 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: This is no longer applicable as the office was not able to mobilize resources for follow up interventions.] History |
Trainings and follow-up actions
Management Response: [Added: 2017/09/15] [Last Updated: 2017/09/15]
Management takes note of the recommendation never the less, it does not foresee this as a possibility for new/follow-up projects related to PAR/SAA
Key Actions:
Focus on local governance
Management Response: [Added: 2017/09/15]
Management takes note of the recommendation. UNDP’s forward-looking plans include the expansion at the municipal level
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
This recommendation will be implemented when designing the follow-up project or other projects contributing to the same outcome
[Added: 2017/09/15] [Last Updated: 2021/01/12] |
Programme Team | 2020/12 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: This is no longer applicable as the office was not able to mobilize resources for follow up interventions.] History |
Introduce small motivational grants
Management Response: [Added: 2017/09/15]
Management takes note of the recommendation never the less, it does not foresee this as a possibility for new/follow-up projects related to PAR/SAA
Key Actions: