Success message
error message
warn message
Terminal Evaluation of the project: Promotion and up-scaling of climate-resilient, resource efficient technologies in a Tropical Island Context (Resource Efficiency)
Commissioning Unit: Seychelles
Evaluation Plan: 2017-2023
Evaluation Type: Project
Completion Date: 12/2019
Unit Responsible for providing Management Response: Seychelles
Documents Related to overall Management Response:  
1. Recommendation:

Terminal Evaluation recommendation 1. The Government of the Seychelles is recommended to continue, the development of framework legislation for energy efficiency and once a strategy has been agreed and a collaboration with an experienced partner established, to move speedily to develop and implement appliance MEPS and labels.  The VAT exemption mechanism, now used independently, can then be used to smoothen the introduction of MEPS. 

Recommendation to: MEECC & SEC.

Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Management response: Management concurs with the recommendation. A consultancy for development of legislation for EE is currently on-going and final report to be submitted to SEC by latter half of 2019. SEC will then proceed with the necessary procedures for enactment. Subsidiary legislation such regulation for MEPS and labels will be developed in due course- but that will fall outside the scope and timeline of the project. It is hoped that the project created the necessary platform for Seychelles to realize its intended ambitions for a renewable energy future.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
1.1 Consultant to finalized Energy Legislation report
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC, MEECC 2019/09 Completed The report was finalized but the review of the Energy efficiency legislation is being done in parallel with the overall Energy Bill History
1.2 SEC to submit to Attorney General Office
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC 2019/12 Completed This was completed but the AGs office has recommended incorporating the EE legislation within the overarching Energy Bill History
1.3 Attorney General Office develop the White paper/ Green paper legislation
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
Attorney General's Office, MEECC, SEC 2020/04 Completed The Cabinet endorsed the EE legislation however as per the recommendations of the AG the overall energy bill is currently in draft stage. This process is well beyond project scope. History
2. Recommendation:

Terminal Evaluation recommendation 2. Project designs need better reviews, including checks on internal consistency and whether baseline information is complete and has been adequately addressed in the project’s strategy. This should also include a check on the project’s strategy and whether this is aligned with the experience and capacity of a country’s government and market parties. 

Recommendation to: UNDP, MEECC and others 

Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Management response:  Management does not fully concur with this recommendation. While UNDP can support with the reviewing project design and ensuring it passes the robustness checks,  the overall  scope of project design and logframe are often suited to reflect the requirements of national stakeholders within the scope of the donor’s requirements. Government is also encouraged to ensure that sufficient institutional capacity exists or will be built during project life cycle. This recommendation also needs to be brought to the attention of GEF, to ensure that project designs are fit-for-purpose within national contexts.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
2.2 Ensure UNDPs new CPD cycle has a robust M&E framework to review progress of project outcomes
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
UNDP 2023/12 Initiated UNDPs next CPD development will commence in 2022/23 and MnE frameworks will be more robust. History
2.1 Flag inconsistencies in CC project design to GEF and limitations of Seychelles as a SIDS
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
UNDP 2020/04 Completed Issues related to project design for CC projects will be communicated if applicable in future funding cycles. History
3. Recommendation:

Terminal Evaluation recommendation 3.  For the Seychelles, the policy approach would need to include a response to its situation as a small island nation, with limited government capacity, a small, relatively unorganised market and complicated trade relationships.  Support of international expert groups might be needed to develop a suitable approach for such situations.

Recommendation to: MEECC & SEC.

Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Management response: Management is aware of the limitations of Seychelles capacity and is already working with international organisations such as IRENA/ SADC/ IOC /CCI with ongoing bilateral cooperation with other countries. More emphasis, will be placed on getting support for Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation related programmes in future discussions to continue the work started under the RE project.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
3.1 Review existing partnerships and agreements with International Partners.
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC, MEECC 2023/12 Initiated The Ministry and the Seychelles Energy Commission have been working with EU, WB and others in the CC mitigation sphere and these partnerships will be ongoing within the context of the NDC and beyond. History
3.2 Engage with the department of Foreign Affairs to ensure that EE remains part of bilateral discussions with select countries
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC, MEECC, DFA 2023/12 Initiated This is ongoing History
4. Recommendation:

Terminal Evaluation recommendation 4. It might be useful to explore whether the Seychelles can develop a collaboration with an established standards and labels programme in a country it has trade relations with. That might make it easier to continue its approach without having to build up the extensive technical knowledge needed to do so independently.

Recommendation to: MEECC & SEC.

Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Management response: Management will look into the feasibility of this recommendation in line with recommendation 3,and whilst reviewing international partnerships and agreements.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
4.1 Same as key action 3.1 and 3.2
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC 2023/12 Initiated Ongoing History
5. Recommendation:

Terminal Evaluation recommendation 5: Results of the project in communication and through its VAT mechanism need to be measured, through household surveys or similar means and through completion of the VAT exemption database. 

Recommendation to: MEECC & SEC.

Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Management response: While management concurs with the recommendation, no further communications with regards to the project will be ongoing. However, the product registry database (NOT VAT EXEMPTION DATABASE) is operational and is being managed by the staff of the SEC. An IT consultant will be supporting the work until end of 2019 supported by project funds.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
5.2 Reporting of key results from the database
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC, MEECC 2023/12 Initiated MRV will be a key component for tracking NDCs and baselines are being established. History
5.1 IT consultant hired to maintain database
[Added: 2020/02/03]
SEC 2019/11 Completed An IT consultant recruited under the project was able to support the SEC until November 2019 to populate the database.
6. Recommendation:

Terminal Evaluation recommendation 6. It would be useful to explore extending the “Switch to LED” exchange campaign, to more lamps and/or to other appliances also. Such approaches are beneficial in particular to low-income households, can offer specific national benefits when electricity tariffs are subsidised and may have a role in tariff restructuring.  

Recommendation to: MEECC, SEC and others

Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Management response: Management concurs with this recommendation and SEC with project partners to explore ways to further improve on the “Switch to LED” exchange programme and consider other similar campaigns, depending on available funding.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
6.3 Evaluate innovative financing opportunities to promote EE for low income households
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC, PUC and others 2023/12 Initiated Ongoing as part of the country's shift towards an energy efficient future History
6.1 Report on the uptake of the “Switch to LED”
[Added: 2020/02/03]
PUC, SEC 2019/12 Completed PUC was collecting data on households that had participated in the SWITCH to LED programme. This information is available on request from PUC.
6.2. Identify ways to improve on the “Switch to LED” exchange programme
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC, PUC, MEECC 2020/12 No Longer Applicable [Justification: More and more households and businesses have shifted to EE based on the availability of goods in the market and now is a market driven initiative]
History
7. Recommendation:

Terminal Evaluation recommendation 7. Future policy or regulatory projects for resource efficiency are not recommended at this point, given that several more years may be needed to reach the objectives of this project and the experience gained with that would be needed for new projects.

Recommendation to: MEECC, SEC and others.

Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Management response: Management does not wholly concur with the recommendation particularly the SEC disagrees with the recommendation from the Terminal evaluator. SEC feels it is imperative to build upon the lessons learned from the UNDP-GEF RE project. The Government will address new opportunities to help ensure the sustainability of Energy Efficiency in the future. This may be in collaboration with other funding partners such as GCF.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
7.1. SEC to identify next steps in addressing gaps and challenges
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC 2020/12 Completed SEC continues to collaborate with partners to address the gaps History
7.2 SEC to continue collaborating with partners for support
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC, MEECC, PUC 2020/12 Completed Recommendation addressed History
8. Recommendation:

Terminal Evaluation recommendation 8: Staff levels at the Renewable energy and energy management unit of the Seychelles Energy Commission urgently need to be brought up to planned levels, so that there is capacity to carry out the regulatory, communication and training activities planned, but not completed, under this project.

Recommendation to: SEC

Management Response: [Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Management response: Management agrees that the SEC needs additional staff to build institutional capacity and to execute planned activities relating to EE- but this remains outside the scope of the project. This would need further discussions between MEECC, SEC, the Ministry of Finance, Department of Public Administration and Public Utilities Corporation as the roles of SEC and PUC need to be re-defined and job descriptions clarified.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
8.1 SEC to initiate discussions to increase its staffing capacity with relevant authorities.
[Added: 2020/02/03] [Last Updated: 2021/07/07]
SEC 2023/12 Initiated Outside the remit of project scope. Currently with new Government in place extensive restructuring is ongoing. History
9. Recommendation:

5. Conclusions, Recommendations & Lessons learnt

5.2. Actions to follow up or reinforce initial benefits from the project (In general)

6) The Government of the Seychelles is recommended to continue, with appropriate urgency, the development of framework legislation for energy efficiency and, once a strategy has been agreed and – hopefully – a collaboration with an experienced partner established, move speedily to develop and implement appliance MEPS and labels. The VAT exemption mechanism, now used independently, can then be used to smoothen the introduction of MEPS. 

 7) There may also be scope to continue and extend the lamps for LED bulbs exchange campaign. A campaign like this essentially shifts the investment from the household to the utility, which would normally not be advisable, however, makes sense if households receive a subsidised energy tariff. A utility then has the choice to reduce electricity demand, and thus the amount of subsidy it needs to provide, for an investment – in this case LED light bulbs. A dedicated calculation is needed whether this approach might make economic sense, at the national level, for extension of the programme (to more light bulbs) and/or to other appliances (which could be exchanged for free or for a reduced price). Reducing household electricity consumption, and thus bills, might also be beneficial for a tariff revision, and reduced cost-efficient appliances could be made part of a larger tariff revision programme.

5.3. Proposals for future directions underlining main objectives

8) At this point in time, no proposals for future directions are suggested. The Government of the Seychelles will need its full attention for bringing what was started with this project to completion, a process that may easily take years and may provide challenges not yet foreseen. New policy- or regulatory-based initiatives around resource efficiency would be ill-advised until the ones started 5 years ago are completed and lessons from that trajectory can be learned. More efforts on communicating the benefits of resource efficiency might benefit the country, however, it is needed to first establish the impact of the communication activities of this project and, given experience so far, it is something the Government should be able to do on its own.

5.4. Best and worst practices in addressing issues relating to relevance, performance and success

Given that project outcomes have largely not yet been achieved and that more work is needed to bring core parts of the project to completion, no practices relating to relevance, performance and success can be discussed at this point.

Management Response: [Added: 2020/11/03] [Last Updated: 2020/11/08]

Key Actions:

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org