Terminal Evaluation of the “Reducing UPOPs and Mercury Releases from the Health Sector in Africa"

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2018-2021, RBEC
Evaluation Type:
Final Project
Planned End Date:
12/2020
Completion Date:
12/2020
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
No
Evaluation Budget(US $):
10,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document ToR TE consultant for GEF MedWaste Africa.docx tor English 36.27 KB Posted 112
Download document Final TE Report Dec2020 GEF MedWaste Africa.pdf report English 2609.81 KB Posted 13
Title Terminal Evaluation of the “Reducing UPOPs and Mercury Releases from the Health Sector in Africa"
Atlas Project Number: 00090700
Evaluation Plan: 2018-2021, RBEC
Evaluation Type: Final Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 12/2020
Planned End Date: 12/2020
Management Response: Yes
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021)
  • 1. Output 1.4.1 Solutions scaled up for sustainable management of natural resources, including sustainable commodities and green and inclusive value chains
Evaluation Budget(US $): 10,000
Source of Funding:
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): 10,000
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Dalibor Kysela Evaluator dkysela@gmx.at
GEF Evaluation: Yes
GEF Project Title: Reducing UPOPs and Mercury Releases from the Health Sector in Africa
Evaluation Type: Terminal Evaluation
Focal Area: Persistent Organic Pollutants
Project Type: FSP
GEF Phase: GEF-5
GEF Project ID: 4611
PIMS Number: 4865
Key Stakeholders: Ministry of Health in Ghana, Madagascar, Tanzania, Zambia; WHO; HCWH;
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1

UNDP IRH should ensure maintenance of the web repository containing the project knowledge products after closure of the project.

2

UNDP IRH should collect all technical reports, market studies and other results of the Lighthouse Projects and make them available through the web repository of the knowledge products.

3

For preparation of multi country projects with sizeable and staged equipment procurement components UNDP should plan minimum 5-years implementation period.

4

 For preparation of future multi-country projects with regional and national components, UNDP should follow the standard Objective-Outcome-Output-Activity pattern and construct project logframe matrix according to substantive topics and assign national or regional responsibility for implementation of individual Outcomes in the results matrix without clustering them according to the implementation responsibility.

5

UNDP should ensure that updated information on actually materialized co-financing for GEF projects is reported in the last two PIRs.

6

UNDP should carefully plan the conduct of Terminal Evaluations. In case TE mission is included in the TE plan, the TE mission should not be conducted earlier than three months before the project planned completion date.

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org