- Evaluation Plan:
- 2018-2022, Kenya
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Project
- Planned End Date:
- 07/2020
- Completion Date:
- 11/2020
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 30,000
Cross- Boarder Coperation Between Kenya and Ethiopia
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR - MTR Cross border (002).pdf |
tor | English | 435.55 KB | Posted | 984 |
| FINAL MTR REPORT cross border.pdf |
report | English | 1363.36 KB | Posted | 1194 |
| Title | Cross- Boarder Coperation Between Kenya and Ethiopia | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 110495 | ||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2018-2022, Kenya | ||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Project | ||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||
| Completion Date: | 11/2020 | ||||||
| Planned End Date: | 07/2020 | ||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 30,000 | ||||||
| Source of Funding: | |||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 10,000 | ||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Governmnet of Kenya (National), County Governmnet of Marsabit | ||||||
| Countries: | KENYA |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Development of Risk Management Plan |
| 2 | Inclusion of the political class and influential traders: |
| 3 | Revision of the Project Log-frame |
| 4 | Extensively involve the local civil society organizations (CSOs): |
| 5 | Model cross-border flagship development initiatives |
| 6 | Draw more partners to scale up and expand the impact: |
Management Response Documents
1. Recommendation:
Development of Risk Management Plan
Management Response: [Added: 2021/08/02]
There is a foreseen risk that COVID-19 and locust invasion will lead to scarcity of resources in the region thereby resulting to re-emergence of conflict. A mitigation plan will be developed in advance to reduce the impact of the risk.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Develop a risk management plan and establish strategies and mitigation measures.
[Added: 2021/08/02] |
UNDP (KCO & ECO) | 2020/11 | Completed |
2. Recommendation:
Inclusion of the political class and influential traders:
Management Response: [Added: 2021/08/02]
In the spirit of leaving no one behind and promoting inclusivity, the project will re-strategize and ensure to include all key stakeholders that will support in achieving the project objectives.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engage the politicians and traders as key stakeholders that will support in achieving the project objectives.
[Added: 2021/08/02] [Last Updated: 2021/09/07] |
UNDP (KCO & ECO) | 2021/02 | Completed | Engagements have been on-going History |
3. Recommendation:
Revision of the Project Log-frame
Management Response: [Added: 2021/08/02] [Last Updated: 2021/08/02]
The project team (Both at Kenya Country office and Ethiopia) will revise the project log-frame putting into consideration the current emerging issues e.g., COVID 19 and locust invasion. This will make the indicators and targets to be responsive to the present situation.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The project team to revise the project log-frame to be shared with the donor
[Added: 2021/08/02] |
UNDP (KCO & ECO) | 2020/12 | Completed |
4. Recommendation:
Extensively involve the local civil society organizations (CSOs):
Management Response: [Added: 2021/08/02]
Partially accept. The involvement of CSOs is key as they reach all areas of the county. However, since these was not incorporated in the initial plan/Project Document, UNDP will involve them as collaborating partners and not implementing partners.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSO engagement to be considered in the next phase of project implementation but to be involved as collaborators in the current project.
[Added: 2021/08/02] [Last Updated: 2021/09/07] |
UNDP (KCO & ECO) | 2021/02 | Completed | The PRODC for the Next phase is currently under development.and has included the CSO engagement History |
5. Recommendation:
Model cross-border flagship development initiatives
Management Response: [Added: 2021/08/02]
Fully ACCEPTED: In the remaining period, the project will focus on working together (Kenya & Ethiopia) for peace and security in the border areas.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development of joint programmes to be implemented by on both sides of the border
[Added: 2021/08/02] [Last Updated: 2021/09/07] |
UNDP (KCO & ECO) | 2021/02 | Completed | Collaboration with other projects such as ABC and Transcending Peace has enhanced joint programming. History |
6. Recommendation:
Draw more partners to scale up and expand the impact:
Management Response: [Added: 2021/08/02]
Fully Accept. Donor round table meeting to be organized to share the achievement of the project and solicit for more resources to support the region.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donor round table meeting to be conducted.
[Added: 2021/08/02] [Last Updated: 2021/09/07] |
UNDP (KCO & ECO) | 2021/02 | Completed | Yes. Done jointly with ABC History |