- Evaluation Plan:
- 2017-2021, Thailand
- Evaluation Type:
- Outcome
- Planned End Date:
- 12/2019
- Completion Date:
- 12/2019
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 30,000
MID-TERM REVIEW UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME COUNTRY PROGRAMME DOCUMENT (CPD) FOR THAILAND 2017-2021
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 ToR CPD MTR_190902.pdf |
tor | English | 112.04 KB | Posted | 931 |
| Thailand CPD MTR Report 2019.pdf |
report | English | 1985.75 KB | Posted | 1147 |
| Title | MID-TERM REVIEW UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME COUNTRY PROGRAMME DOCUMENT (CPD) FOR THAILAND 2017-2021 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 81751,88557,99877 | ||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2017-2021, Thailand | ||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Outcome | ||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||
| Completion Date: | 12/2019 | ||||||
| Planned End Date: | 12/2019 | ||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 30,000 | ||||||
| Source of Funding: | UNDP TRAC | ||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 43,000 | ||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||
| Countries: | THAILAND |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings | |
| 1. | Overview of the Country Programme Results and Indicators The UNDP CPD for Thailand 2017-2021 is strategically linked to the pillars of the Thai government’s policy vision “Stability, Prosperity, and Sustainability”. The CPD identifies a focus on addressing the persistent inequality, environmental degradation, public service delivery challenges, and inherent vulnerability of social incoherence and climate change impacts. The specific approaches utilised by the CO involves: increased focus on its comparative advantage as an impartial partner; employing inclusive, participatory and results-based approach to its programming; engagement with private sector, donors, civil society, philanthropic foundations and public entities for resource mobilization; contribution to research agenda with ongoing internal analysis on key democratic processes; and investment in climate-related planning for business continuity and emergency preparedness, contingency funds and information management . Tag: Climate change governance Relevance Financial Inclusion Vulnerable |
| 2. | Programme Priorities and Partnership The programme priorities under the CPD are identified from the present situation as crucial for Thailand’s sustainable development and arranged within two interrelated themes of addressing six key development issues (Annex 8) have: (i) inequality (widespread by geography, gender and ethnicity); (ii) environmental degradation (due to ineffective law enforcement and implementation); (iii) climate change (growing vulnerability to impacts in terms of land quality, health and natural disasters); (iv) public service delivery (centralized system, limited public participation, corruption); (v) social cohesion (political or social tension linked to economic disparity and inequality); and, (vi) innovation (investment on facility for research and knowledge that promotes democratic governance and sustainability). Tag: Climate change governance Environment Policy Anti-corruption Inclusive economic growth Inequalities Trade and Development Agenda 2030 |
| 3. | Promoting Anti-Corruption, Inclusive Engagement and Social Cohesion A wide range of approaches and partnerships are applied to achieve the programme priority on promoting anti-corruption, inclusive engagement and social cohesion. This includes fostering partnerships between civil society and the private sector through capacity-building for the private sector; strengthening citizen participation in public accountability; using innovative technologies for public engagement enable reporting mechanisms for corruption in accessing social services and in measuring the implementation of environmental regulations and laws, engaging youth for more accountable institutions and scaling the results through geographical expansion; promoting the sustainability of the network and its outreach activities; scaling up work on strengthening social cohesion and livelihoods of women and communities through substantially increasing the number of locally initiated female-headed community enterprise initiatives; ensuring sustainability through reinvestment at the community level of the profit generated by the social enterprises; working on gender rights in areas where women are at a disadvantage, LGBTI rights, and inequality; and, developing the capacity of civil society to facilitate participation of communities and women in the dialogue process as potential agents of change. Sample projects under implementation/planned include: • Promoting a fair Business Environment (Anti-corruption) • Business and Human Rights • Non-discrimination and LGBTI Inclusion • Social Innovation • Preventing Violent Extremism • Southern Thailand Empowerment Programme/Peacebuilding in the Deep South (both ongoing and forward looking) Tag: Anti-corruption Civic Engagement Jobs and Livelihoods Institutional Strengthening Vulnerable Women and gilrs |
| 4. | Programme Implementation and Risk Management The CPD 2017-2021 is implemented through national implementing partners, under the coordination of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the NESDB1 , with UNDP direct implementation under special circumstances or on specific issues such as campaigns, innovation facilities and policy advice. Financial resources2 are dominantly from GEF. To achieve the $50 million target for resource mobilization under the current CDP, additional non-traditional partners will be engaged through “flexible and adaptable cutting-edge interventions”. To reaffirm its neutrality and professionalism to maintain the Government’s trust, UNDP works with civil society or communities, while continuing to coordinate closely with the public sector partners and monitoring national political and economic dynamics through ongoing programmes implementation and advocacy to leverage resources that are responsive to the national environment and in the core UNDP mandate areas. The CPD also outlines specific actions (i.e. contingency funds and information management) to cope with potential threat from environmental risks, including climate change and disasters. Tag: Resource mobilization Human and Financial resources Implementation Modality Innovation Risk Management |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | At Programme Level: Relevance It has been observed that the CPD for the period is relevant to the Thai context and reflects the country’s needs and priorities. However, it seems that UNDP is not familiar to some institutions and people, particularly those in non-government sector and outside the capital. Recommendation 1: UNDP should communicate more on its efforts, working through SDGs localization and engaging multi-stakeholders in social innovation development and initiatives, as well as engaging more with the private sector for sustainable results. |
| 2 | At Programme Level: Effectiveness The CPD effectiveness is mixed. It seems higher in the IGSD programme, where the adoption of regional fund management tools has allowed for enhanced planning and monitoring. There appears to be too small projects/activities, particularly in the DGSA programme. Programming, planning and management processes were observed to be very different across programmes. In some projects, the excessive number of stakeholders and activities hindered the impact and effectiveness of planned actions. The achievement of project results seems uneven across thematic areas. It depends upon project structure, number and typology of actions, nature of the IPs, as well as institutional context. Recommendation 2:
|
| 3 | At Programme Level: Efficiency The project managers noted some improvements, but stakeholders concluded that much needs to be done to improve resource planning, programme management, reporting (timing and format). Project resources seem correctly and reasonably allocated, albeit adjustment required in some projects. Recommendation 3:
|
| 4 | At Programme Level: Sustainability Sustainability is still an issue and not adequately supported by management mechanisms and tools. Sustainability elements should be inserted in the CPD, in project documents (i.e., exit strategy) and in reporting arrangements. The use of knowledge resources developed within the programmes or projects is not obvious. However, the support of UNDP to Thailand’s policies through capacity building and other actions will continue. Recommendation 4:
|
| 5 | At Strategic Level Recommendation I: UNDP to further enhance and broaden the outreach of its advocacy to the general public, particularly those living in poverty, disadvantaged, and vulnerable people. |
| 6 | At strategic level Recommendation II: UNDP’s relative strength is its close cooperation with the relevant government institutions and in the setting of priorities for capacity building as the creation of an enabling environment with appropriate policy and legal frameworks, institutional development, including community participation and engagement through integrated solutions (i.e. data and analytics, innovation and learning, and financing expertise) to allow development transformation within these institutions. |
| 7 | At strategic level Recommendation III: To promote its SDGs integration and localization role, UNDP Thailand should become more active in the area of programme synchronization and coordination between specialized institutions of the government and the UN system. This might counteract projectisation and labour-intensive project cycle management. |
| 8 | At strategic level Recommendation IV: UNDP Thailand is not fully capitalizing on its full potential with regard to building partnerships. Conscious outreach to bilateral and embassies, as well as the private sector and foundations, for collaborations, through designing specific resource mobilization strategies and institutionalizing regular programme meetings that cut across development sectors, is highly recommended. |
| 9 | At strategic level Recommendation V: UNDP could support more effectively Thailand’s efforts in decentralizing development, social innovation and reducing inequalities by using its global experiences and networks. |
Management Response Documents
- Management Response for CPD_final.pdf Management Response to MTR_CPD
1. Recommendation:
At Programme Level: Relevance
It has been observed that the CPD for the period is relevant to the Thai context and reflects the country’s needs and priorities. However, it seems that UNDP is not familiar to some institutions and people, particularly those in non-government sector and outside the capital.
Recommendation 1:
UNDP should communicate more on its efforts, working through SDGs localization and engaging multi-stakeholders in social innovation development and initiatives, as well as engaging more with the private sector for sustainable results.
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/03/12]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The senior management of CO has tasked the team leader for governance unit to develop a work programme on SDGs localization for the Country Office.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
Resident Representative (RR) | 2021/12 | Completed | For this year, the new integrated program team leader was on board and support on the program development to localized SDG in CO. History | |
| The senior management of CO will hire a full- time staff to lead the SDGs localization programmatic issues.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
RR | 2021/12 | Completed | All staff engaged and contributed their work for SDGs localization program issues. History |
2. Recommendation:
At Programme Level: Effectiveness
The CPD effectiveness is mixed. It seems higher in the IGSD programme, where the adoption of regional fund management tools has allowed for enhanced planning and monitoring. There appears to be too small projects/activities, particularly in the DGSA programme. Programming, planning and management processes were observed to be very different across programmes. In some projects, the excessive number of stakeholders and activities hindered the impact and effectiveness of planned actions. The achievement of project results seems uneven across thematic areas. It depends upon project structure, number and typology of actions, nature of the IPs, as well as institutional context.
Recommendation 2:
- Continuous capacity building of national and local institutions.
- Exploring strategic innovative partnerships and enhancing national-local cooperation.
- Re-think the structure of programmes and projects – more focused can make more impact (i.e. innovative project design that require inclusive and integrated approaches).
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/03/12]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project managers and programme staff to provide training (subject matters, procedural) to national/local institutes in order to enhance effective delivery of project interventions.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
CO project and programme colleagues | 2021/12 | Completed | This is an ongoing engagement by the CO which will continue beyond 2021. History | |
| Be proactive in fostering innovative partnerships with non-conventional partners to create development results.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
RR/DRR | 2021/12 | Completed | This is an ongoing engagement by the CO which will continue beyond 2021. History | |
| Redesign CO structure to be more integrated across programmes
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
RR/DRR | 2021/12 | Completed | The CO structure has been re-designed to be more integrated across programmes. History |
3. Recommendation:
At Programme Level: Efficiency
The project managers noted some improvements, but stakeholders concluded that much needs to be done to improve resource planning, programme management, reporting (timing and format). Project resources seem correctly and reasonably allocated, albeit adjustment required in some projects.
Recommendation 3:
- Strengthening and enhancing M&E with IT systems
- Resource Mobilization Strategy
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/03/12]
The country office takes note of this recommendation and will consult with RBAP Director on a resource mobilization strategy for CO’s investment.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Request more resource from RBAP for investment on M&E capacity strengthening
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
RR | 2021/12 | Completed | There is now a full time staff member on RBM at NOA level within the CO new organigram. History | |
| Pro-active role to access non-vertical funding resources
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
RR/DRR | 2021/12 | Completed | This is an ongoing engagement by the CO which will continue beyond 2021. History |
4. Recommendation:
At Programme Level: Sustainability
Sustainability is still an issue and not adequately supported by management mechanisms and tools. Sustainability elements should be inserted in the CPD, in project documents (i.e., exit strategy) and in reporting arrangements. The use of knowledge resources developed within the programmes or projects is not obvious. However, the support of UNDP to Thailand’s policies through capacity building and other actions will continue.
Recommendation 4:
- More attention is required by IPs and UNDP programme staff/project personnel to make further use of the knowledge resources.
- Insert a sustainability (exit strategy) section in all projects’ templates – including reporting - and in the CPD.
- Focus on institutional sustainability, ensuring as much as possible that training material and knowledge resources are duly embedded in the beneficiary institutions.
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/03/12]
The recommendation is partially supported. The exit strategy is not appropriate term for the CPD. Suggest to use the term “sustainability/continuity” strategy since the CPD supports Thailand development process towards SDGs achievement by 2030 and beyond.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The programme officers ensure all knowledge products to be used by the beneficiary institutions.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
Project Managers | 2021/12 | Completed | This is an ongoing engagement by the CO which will continue beyond 2021. History |
5. Recommendation:
At Strategic Level
Recommendation I: UNDP to further enhance and broaden the outreach of its advocacy to the general public, particularly those living in poverty, disadvantaged, and vulnerable people.
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/03/12]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To invest in communication personnel, budget, and improve efficiency and effectiveness of teamwork.
[Added: 2021/03/12] |
Senior Management, All staff | 2020/10 | Completed | A new communication officer who replaced the departed staff was recruited whereas two communication officers from Nepal CO were assigned to support the CO during the recruitment period. CO’s visibility has increased significantly over the period. | |
| Communication calendar for globally recognized days to be prepared for timely promotion through several modes of communication channels such as Resident Representative’s twitter, UNDP CO Facebook, Instagram, annual report, human story, news, short films.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
Senior Management, All staff | 2021/12 | Completed | Several modes of communications have been engaged to promote CO's work. History |
6. Recommendation:
At strategic level
Recommendation II: UNDP’s relative strength is its close cooperation with the relevant government institutions and in the setting of priorities for capacity building as the creation of an enabling environment with appropriate policy and legal frameworks, institutional development, including community participation and engagement through integrated solutions (i.e. data and analytics, innovation and learning, and financing expertise) to allow development transformation within these institutions.
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/03/12]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO to engage non-state actors and vulnerable peoples (e.g. youth, PwD, LBGTI, Indigenous peoples) in tackling development challenges through integrated solutions.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
Programme/ Project officers | 2021/12 | Completed | CO organized YouthCo: Lab to empower youth creativity for resolving development issues and provide economic opportunities for themselves. History |
7. Recommendation:
At strategic level
Recommendation III: To promote its SDGs integration and localization role, UNDP Thailand should become more active in the area of programme synchronization and coordination between specialized institutions of the government and the UN system. This might counteract projectisation and labour-intensive project cycle management.
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/03/12]
Agreed.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO to initiate proactive integration of thematic areas and SDGs localization through existing projects/initiatives. This should also be reflected in a streamlined programme reporting at the end of the year.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
RR/DRR | 2021/12 | Completed | This is an ongoing engagement by the CO which will continue beyond 2021. History |
8. Recommendation:
At strategic level
Recommendation IV: UNDP Thailand is not fully capitalizing on its full potential with regard to building partnerships. Conscious outreach to bilateral and embassies, as well as the private sector and foundations, for collaborations, through designing specific resource mobilization strategies and institutionalizing regular programme meetings that cut across development sectors, is highly recommended.
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/03/12]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior management of CO to reach out to the selected embassies and private sector partners who share same interests/objectives in order to advance the SDGs.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
RR/DRR | 2021/12 | Completed | This is an ongoing engagement by the CO which will continue beyond 2021. History |
9. Recommendation:
At strategic level
Recommendation V: UNDP could support more effectively Thailand’s efforts in decentralizing development, social innovation and reducing inequalities by using its global experiences and networks.
Management Response: [Added: 2021/03/12]
Agreed
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Human Development Report shall be used an instrument for positioning UNDP CO Thailand to advocate with the parliament and NESDC and private sector.
[Added: 2021/03/12] [Last Updated: 2021/12/22] |
Senior Management | 2021/12 | Completed | This is an ongoing engagement by the CO which will continue beyond 2021. History |