- Evaluation Plan:
- 2018-2022, Egypt
- Evaluation Type:
- Project
- Planned End Date:
- 03/2022
- Completion Date:
- 02/2022
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 10,000
Final Evaluation for Participatory Strategic Planning for Balanced Spatial Development (SPAD)
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TORs SPAD Final Evaluation (Re-ad II).pdf |
tor | English | 465.27 KB | Posted | 125 |
| Final Evaluation Report - SPAD 2020.pdf |
report | English | 7618.27 KB | Posted | 118 |
| Title | Final Evaluation for Participatory Strategic Planning for Balanced Spatial Development (SPAD) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00107093 | ||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2018-2022, Egypt | ||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Project | ||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||
| Completion Date: | 02/2022 | ||||||
| Planned End Date: | 03/2022 | ||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 10,000 | ||||||
| Source of Funding: | |||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 2,000 | ||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||
| Countries: | EGYPT |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Recommendation 1: It is recommended to ensure that all outputs produced by the project are to be published and handed to governmental agencies, ministries, and governorates, as well as discussed on the Governor Level. |
| 2 | Recommendation 2: It is recommended to organize a conference in the Supreme council for planning that is focused on the NSLUP produced, the proposed gateway for development, priority regions, and tourism |
| 3 | Recommendation 3: It is recommended to organize a final workshop focusing on the project’s achievements and the way forward for Geospatial planning tools and data established supporting urban planning and decision-making mechanisms. |
| 4 | Recommendation 4: It is recommended to produce roadmap detailing the way forward in GIS Platform updating. (One-day Orientation for every GOPP project team for the GIS delivery glossary and scheme). |
| 5 | Recommendation 5: It is recommended for the GOPP Regional Center to sustain their human resources and sustain the GIS team needed to adopt a policy in which each trainee should train two of his/her RC collogue. |
| 6 | Recommendation 6: It is recommended for good planning practice to consider “Quality Control” in the process of forming geo-database for any project. The GOPP would achieve this by publishing GIS scheme and quality control program to be used for planning deliverables on different levels. |
| 7 | Recommendation 7: It is recommended to adopt a control policy to secure the servers of the GIS enterprise to introduce it to main stakeholders’ use. |
| 8 | Recommendation 8: It is recommended to integrate environmental impact and climate change aspects on the update of the national development plan. |