- Evaluation Plan:
- 2016-2022, Zambia
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Project
- Planned End Date:
- 09/2022
- Completion Date:
- 05/2022
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 60,000
Mid term Evaluation of the Democracy Strengthening in Zambia project
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Mid term Review ToRs 21-10-21.pdf |
tor | English | 629.42 KB | Posted | 3 |
| FINAL DSZ Midterm Evaluation Report May2022.pdf |
report | English | 2395.49 KB | Posted | 4 |
| Title | Mid term Evaluation of the Democracy Strengthening in Zambia project | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00124412 | |||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2016-2022, Zambia | |||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Project | |||||||||
| Status: | Completed | |||||||||
| Completion Date: | 05/2022 | |||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 09/2022 | |||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | |||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
|||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
|||||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
|||||||||
| SDG Target |
|
|||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 60,000 | |||||||||
| Source of Funding: | European Union, France, Germany, Ireland, Sweden, United Kingdom and USAID | |||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 57,000 | |||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | |||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | |||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
|||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | |||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Electoral Commission of Zambia, Zambia Police Service, Human Rights Commission, Judiciary and Ministry of Justice | |||||||||
| Countries: | ZAMBIA |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Carry out an independent lesson learnt reflection on the causes to the DSZ implementation delays |
| 2 | Risk Management: Although a risk register existed, its use as a management tool was less evident. Moving forward, a review of the risk register needs to be carried out on a quarterly basis involving reflection on activities’ impacts and possible alternative strategies where delays are likely. |
| 3 | Developing Effective M & E system & QA |
| 4 | Added value of final evaluation to be determined on its ability to test new platforms having operated to scale. |
| 5 | Supporting the further validation of iVerify through piloting and development of MOU with key stakeholders |
| 6 | Building sustainable voter education |