- Evaluation Plan:
- 2006-2010, China
- Evaluation Type:
- Outcome
- Planned End Date:
- 12/2008
- Completion Date:
- 02/2009
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 20,000
Partnerships (CPO-10)
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR.pdf |
tor | Posted | 672 | ||
| Outcome_Evaluation_Report_-_CPD_Outcome_10_-_Final.pdf |
report | English | Posted | 677 |
| Title | Partnerships (CPO-10) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | |||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2006-2010, China | ||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Outcome | ||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||
| Completion Date: | 02/2009 | ||||||
| Planned End Date: | 12/2008 | ||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 20,000 | ||||||
| Source of Funding: | |||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||
| Countries: | CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC | ||||||
| Comments: | Partners will include the government, CICETE, China's Guangci Programme, China-Afica Business Council (CABC), UNDP Special Unit for South-South Cooperation, etc. |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
| 2 | Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 1: A more explicit explanation of how UNDP project support and 'soft assistance' has benefited the poor would strengthen the Global Partnerships outcome |
| 3 | Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 2: South-South Cooperation activities would benefit from formalizing links between UNDP country offices in the SSC project countries |
| 4 | Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 3: Projects would be strengthened if the project planning documents placed more emphasis on risks, possible causes of delays, and possible problems with joint funding |
1. Recommendation:
Management Response: [Added: 2008/12/26]
Key Actions:
2. Recommendation: Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 1: A more explicit explanation of how UNDP project support and 'soft assistance' has benefited the poor would strengthen the Global Partnerships outcome
Management Response: [Added: 2008/12/26]
UNDP China agrees to the evaluation recommendation and will take follow-up actions.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1. Creating strong links among South-South portfolio and poverty-reduction portfolio, in AWPs of IPRCC II and CABC II as well as activity-level exchanges among IPRCC, CABC and TCDC.
[Added: 2008/12/26] |
SED & SSC Team/CO | No due date | No deadline established | The annual workplans (AWPs) for 2009 are being developed discussed with the counterparts. | |
| 1.2. Creating strong links to poverty-reduction in new project formulation (CABC II, IPRCC II)
[Added: 2008/12/26] |
SED & SSC Team/CO | No due date | No deadline established | The CABC II and IPRCC II are being formulated. |
3. Recommendation: Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 2: South-South Cooperation activities would benefit from formalizing links between UNDP country offices in the SSC project countries
Management Response: [Added: 2008/12/26]
UNDP China agrees to the evaluation recommendation and will take follow-up actions.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1. Formalizing links between UNDP country offices in the SSC project countries in new regional projects on Greater Tumen Initiative, etc
[Added: 2008/12/26] |
SED & SSC Team/CO | No due date | No deadline established | ||
| 2.2. Inviting UNDP country offices in the SSC project countries to important events in regional projects
[Added: 2008/12/26] |
SED & SSC Team/CO | No due date | No deadline established | The annual workplans (AWPs) for 2009 are being developed and discussed with the counterparts. |
4. Recommendation: Evaluation Recommendation or Issue 3: Projects would be strengthened if the project planning documents placed more emphasis on risks, possible causes of delays, and possible problems with joint funding
Management Response: [Added: 2008/12/26]
UNDP China agrees to the evaluation recommendation and will take follow-up actions.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 More detailed risks analysis in CABC II formulation and probably in the new regional project on GTI
[Added: 2008/12/26] |
SED & SSC Team/CO | No due date | No deadline established | CABC II is being formulated. | |
| 3.2 Closer monitoring of joint funding status in ongoing projects
[Added: 2008/12/26] |
SED & SSC Team/CO | No due date | No deadline established | ||
| 3.3 The outputs of each project should be better prioritized, including clearly defined 'exit strategy'. This could be seen in the ongoing CABC II formulation, with a focus on its financial sustainability.
[Added: 2008/12/26] |
SED & SSC Team/CO | No due date | No deadline established | CABC II is being formulated. |