PIMS 2894 BD FSP Polesie Full-scale project

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2006-2010, Belarus
Evaluation Type:
Mid Term Project
Planned End Date:
12/2008
Completion Date:
08/2009
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
2,192

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document 2894 Belarus - Polesie - MTE TOR -final_ENG_231008.doc tor English 181.50 KB Posted 717
Download document Final Mid-term evaluation report-8 january 2009.doc report English 2481.50 KB Posted 1462
Download document METT_as_of_July_2009.doc report English 829.50 KB Posted 601
Download document BelarusPoessje MTE Management_Response_final.doc report English 136.50 KB Posted 843
Title PIMS 2894 BD FSP Polesie Full-scale project
Atlas Project Number:
Evaluation Plan: 2006-2010, Belarus
Evaluation Type: Mid Term Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 08/2009
Planned End Date: 12/2008
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Crisis Prevention & Recovery
  • 2. Environment & Sustainable Development
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Development plans and programmes integrate environmentally sustainable solutions in a manner that promotes poverty reduction, MDG achievement and low-emission climate-resilient development
Evaluation Budget(US $): 2,192
Source of Funding:
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Carsten Germer and Sergei Gotin Team Leader
Carsten Germer and Sergei Gotin Team Leader
UNDP Belarus Team Leader
GEF Evaluation: Yes
Evaluation Type:
Focal Area: Biodiversity
Project Type: EA
GEF Phase: GEF-1
PIMS Number:
Key Stakeholders:
Countries: BELARUS, REPUBLIC OF
Comments: Mid-term project evaluation
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1 The lack of an overall project work-plan for the full duration of the project has had some impact on the project implementation as some activities have ?drifted? (i.e. agro/eco-tourism and initiation of various construction works) causing delays which might affect the achievement of individual project outputs and outcomes. It is thus recommended that the Project prepare specific work-plans (official or unofficial) to guide it in a successful finalization of the project. At this point in time the Project is in a position where it still can meet its set targets (as listed in the Project Document and the Project log-frame) but a focused and strategic planning is needed.
2 The MTE Team further suggests that the project critically review the feasibility (financial and otherwise) of a, six to eight months, ?no cost? project extension. Such an extension would not only provide the project more time to monitor and evaluate the impact and benefits of its agro/eco-tourism and monitoring components, but it would also put the project in a better position for reaching its target particularly in relation to the ?conversion? of polders.
1. Recommendation: The lack of an overall project work-plan for the full duration of the project has had some impact on the project implementation as some activities have ?drifted? (i.e. agro/eco-tourism and initiation of various construction works) causing delays which might affect the achievement of individual project outputs and outcomes. It is thus recommended that the Project prepare specific work-plans (official or unofficial) to guide it in a successful finalization of the project. At this point in time the Project is in a position where it still can meet its set targets (as listed in the Project Document and the Project log-frame) but a focused and strategic planning is needed.
Management Response: [Added: 2010/11/09]

Fully agree. Currently, the main tool used for planning is annual detailed work plan prepared for each project year, and approved by the national executing agency, Ministry of Environment, and UNDP. Development of an overall project work-plan for the full duration of the project appears to be a useful tool to ensure focused strategic planning. Develop. The plan is to be approved by UNDP Belarus and the national executing agency.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
An overall project work-plan for the full duration of the project will be developed
[Added: 2010/11/09] [Last Updated: 2011/04/15]
PMU 2009/12 Completed
The overall plan will be approved by UNDP Belarus and the Ministry of Environment of Belarus.
[Added: 2010/11/09] [Last Updated: 2011/04/15]
PMU, UNDP, MoEnv 2009/12 Completed
2. Recommendation: The MTE Team further suggests that the project critically review the feasibility (financial and otherwise) of a, six to eight months, ?no cost? project extension. Such an extension would not only provide the project more time to monitor and evaluate the impact and benefits of its agro/eco-tourism and monitoring components, but it would also put the project in a better position for reaching its target particularly in relation to the ?conversion? of polders.
Management Response: [Added: 2010/11/09]

There were some delays during the first half of the project implementation which caused the project to fall behind the schedule with some activities implementation, particularly in case of demonstration of viability of alternative use of polders, and development of eco-tourism on the natural reserves territories. Project extension would allow achieving fully the project outputs, along with monitoring/verification of the effectiveness and sustainability of the project results. However, even no cost project extension means administrative additional expenses (project staff salaries, communication, etc). Currently, the project finish date is April 2011. An extension until end of 2011 can be considered. The decision of project extension (or not extension) should be based on evaluation of the results of project implementation in 2009- 2010, taking into account availability of funds to cover additional administrative expenses. It appears that the best time for extension consideration is end of 2010; and the extension should be endorsed by the Project Steering Committee (PSC).

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Close monitoring of project implementation with focus on project outputs.
[Added: 2010/11/09] [Last Updated: 2011/04/15]
PMU, UNDP 2010/12 Completed Monitoring of project implementation will continue through 2011
Evaluation of project implementation and consideration of project extension at the end of 2010. In case of request for extension, it should be endorsed by the PSC
[Added: 2010/11/09] [Last Updated: 2011/04/15]
PMU, UNDP, MoEnv and PSC 2010/12 Completed Project has been extended till 31 Dec 2011

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org