Terminal Evaluation-Conservation of the Biodiversity in the Albertine Rift Forests of Uganda

Terminal Evaluation-Conservation of the Biodiversity in the Albertine Rift Forests of Uganda

Completedon 9 Dec, 2012
Evaluation Plan
Planned End Date
Dec 2012
Evaluation Type
Project
Management Response
Yes
Evaluation Budget
$30,000
Summary
The project was beset with issues starting right from its exceptionally long gestation. Having been conceived in 1996, it was only in 2006 that the project documents were finally fully approved and in 2007 the contracts signed. One immediate consequence of this was that all the cofinancing was redundant: the cofinacers had either completed the work that was supposed to be carried out simultaneously or had withdrawn their funding. If the implementation had started on time, the project would have worked at a higher, strategic level in synergy with a suite of work that was being implemented on the ground. As a consequence, the project was immediately torn as to the role it should play. But from the outset, the Inception Report did not adequately refocus the project on the priorities at the time of the project?s start. Indeed, it was two years before the project began to find the role that it should play; this coincided with the recruitment of the TA. The MTE was carried out in late 2010 although it was only approved in April 2011 by which time the project, according to the official GEF timeline, had only eight more months to run. The project?s application for a year?s no-cost extension was cut to six months and so the project was drawn to a close on 30 June 2012
  • Evaluation Information
Evaluation Title
Terminal Evaluation-Conservation of the Biodiversity in the Albertine Rift Forests of Uganda
Atlas Project Number
00051397
Plan Period
Status
Completed
Type
Project
Management Response
Yes
Plan Date
1 Dec, 2012
Quality Assessment
Yes
Completion Date
9 Dec, 2012
Joint Programme
No
Joint Evaluation
No
Budget
$30,000
GEF Evaluation
Yes
Expand
Expenditure
$0
Stakeholders
UNDP, World Wide Fund for Nature,District Local Governments of Hoima, Kibaale, Kyenjojo and Masindi
Source of Funding
Project funds
Countries
Uganda
Comments
Yes
Expand