Final evaluation Climate change resilient production landscapes and socio-economic networks advanced in Guatemala.

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2015-2019, Guatemala
Evaluation Type:
Final Project
Planned End Date:
11/2019
Completion Date:
11/2018
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
No
Evaluation Budget(US $):
25,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document TORS Evaluación final del Fondo de Adaptación.pdf tor Spanish 1063.90 KB Posted 38
Download document TE AF Guatemala 4386 nov 2018 english-final.pdf report English 1304.94 KB Posted 2
Title Final evaluation Climate change resilient production landscapes and socio-economic networks advanced in Guatemala.
Atlas Project Number: 00060326
Evaluation Plan: 2015-2019, Guatemala
Evaluation Type: Final Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 11/2018
Planned End Date: 11/2019
Management Response: No
Focus Area:
  • 1. Others
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Output 1.3. Solutions developed at national and sub-national levels for sustainable management of natural resources, ecosystem services, chemicals and waste
Evaluation Budget(US $): 25,000
Source of Funding:
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): 25,000
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
GEF Evaluation: No
Key Stakeholders: Ministry of the Environment and natural Resources and Municipalities.
Countries: GUATEMALA
Comments: Adaptation Fund
Lessons
1.

In this section, the lessons that have been capitalized by the various actors participating in the project actions are presented. These have been surveyed through the interviews of the evaluation process. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of learnings, but to note those that may be more significant for future interventions around the implementation of adaptation and mitigation actions to climate change.

  1. At the community level, it may be more useful for communities to assimilate "adaptation and mitigation to climate change" through specific actions on the issue (for example, adaptation measures such as water harvesting, soil improvement, etc.), allowing them to relate the problem to their daily lives and to assimilate the tools through practical activities (learning by doing). At the time of the evaluation, a group from a Nicaraguan organization was visiting a group, becoming familiar with the practices implemented by the project.
  2. Sometimes, local processes generate advances that serve as a reference for the national level and enrich it.[1] 
  3. To favor the alliances between the diverse actors linked to the subject, including the promotion of joint actions between scientific institutions, academia, community organizations, private sector, government.
  4. The evaluation made it possible to observe, as a lesson learned, that project design is effective and efficient when the pertinent adjustments are made in order to act synergistically and jointly as required by the nature of the project itself. The highly complex and vulnerable areas require that international cooperation and institutions work with a multidimensional approach to comprehensively focus on the issues addressed. Intervention in the watersheds of the Nahualá River requires joint operations, for meeting problems of poverty, ethnicity, social and political.

 


[1] Ex: the process around the establishment of meters to measure the consumption of water in homes, carried out by the Water Committee of Chiquix Village, Municipality of Nahualá.


Findings
View report for recommendation

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

220 East 42nd Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org