Evaluacion de medio termino del Proyecto URU/13/G32 Gestion Ambientalmente Adecuada del Ciclo de Vida de los Productos que contienen Mercurio y sus Desechos

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2016-2020, Uruguay
Evaluation Type:
Mid Term Project
Planned End Date:
10/2018
Completion Date:
08/2018
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
15,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document Informe_final_URU 13 G32.pdf tor English 1070.99 KB Posted 115
Download document Annex_2_Results_matrix 13G32.pdf related-document English 50.84 KB Posted 133
Download document Annex_3_Mission_agenda 13 G32.pdf related-document English 139.48 KB Posted 158
Download document Annex_4_List of Interviewees 13 G32.pdf related-document English 2061.54 KB Posted 207
Download document Annex_5_Evaluation questions matrix 13 G32.docx related-document English 21.54 KB Posted 134
Download document Annex_6_Document_list 13 G32.pdf related-document English 21.84 KB Posted 143
Download document Annex_7_audit trail 13 G32.docx related-document English 51.22 KB Posted 130
Download document Annex_8_tentative List for indicators 13 G32.pdf related-document English 11.52 KB Posted 140
Download document Annex_1_ToR-URU 13 G32.pdf tor English 971.99 KB Posted 128
Download document Informe_final_URU 13 G32.pdf report Spanish 1070.99 KB Posted 110
Title Evaluacion de medio termino del Proyecto URU/13/G32 Gestion Ambientalmente Adecuada del Ciclo de Vida de los Productos que contienen Mercurio y sus Desechos
Atlas Project Number: 00074817
Evaluation Plan: 2016-2020, Uruguay
Evaluation Type: Mid Term Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 08/2018
Planned End Date: 10/2018
Management Response: Yes
UNDP Signature Solution:
  • 1. Sustainable
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021)
  • 1. Output 2.4.1 Gender-responsive legal and regulatory frameworks, policies and institutions strengthened, and solutions adopted, to address conservation, sustainable use and equitable benefit sharing of natural resources, in line with international conventions and national legislation
SDG Goal
  • Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
SDG Target
  • 12.4 By 2020, achieve the environmentally sound management of chemicals and all wastes throughout their life cycle, in accordance with agreed international frameworks, and significantly reduce their release to air, water and soil in order to minimize their adverse impacts on human health and the environment
Evaluation Budget(US $): 15,000
Source of Funding: Presupuesto del Proyecto
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): 17,676
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Jorge Leiva Valenzuela
GEF Evaluation: Yes
GEF Project Title: Gesti�³n ambientalmente Adecuada del Ciclo de Vida de los Productos que contienen Mercurio y sus Desechos
Evaluation Type: Mid-term Review
Focal Area: Persistent Organic Pollutants
Project Type: MSP
GEF Phase: GEF-5
GEF Project ID: 4998
PIMS Number: 5084
Key Stakeholders: GEF, MVOTMA, MSP, PCTP, AUCI
Countries: URUGUAY
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1

An extension for an additional year is recommended to allow project to meet its desired results.

2

Release of the Hg analyzer from MS is a need for the project. It is recommended to set a deadline to MSP to start-up and operate the analyzer (2 months would be a reasonable time), otherwise the equipment should be allocated to another institution with capacity to put it in operation.

3

Elaborate a project exit strategy, lessons learnt document, a project gender strategy /plan and the strategy for replication.

1. Recommendation:

An extension for an additional year is recommended to allow project to meet its desired results.

Management Response: [Added: 2019/02/18]

Agree.  The extension  request was submitted  to UNDP/GEF and was granted on 01/10/2018 for 18 months.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Submit the request to UNDP/GEF
[Added: 2019/02/18]
MVOTMA with UNDP Country Office 2018/10 Completed
2. Recommendation:

Release of the Hg analyzer from MS is a need for the project. It is recommended to set a deadline to MSP to start-up and operate the analyzer (2 months would be a reasonable time), otherwise the equipment should be allocated to another institution with capacity to put it in operation.

Management Response: [Added: 2019/02/18]

Agree.The DINAMA Laboratory is interested in strengthening its capacities in mercury analysis. The reallocation of the equipment should be coordinated between the 2 Ministers (MVOTMA and MS)

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
Identify another institution where the Hg analyzer could be installed and put in operation.
[Added: 2019/02/18]
MVOTMA with Country Office 2019/02 Completed The DINAMA laboratory was identified to reallocate the HG analyzer and a letter from MVOTMA to MS was sent to coordinate the equipment transfer.
3. Recommendation:

Elaborate a project exit strategy, lessons learnt document, a project gender strategy /plan and the strategy for replication.

Management Response: [Added: 2019/02/18]

Agree.  A gender consultant will be hired, and the project exist strategy and lessons learned will be included in the 2019 workplan and will be an integral part of the final project report.

Key Actions:

Key Action Responsible DueDate Status Comments Documents
-Hire a gender consultant to develop a gender analysis- -Elaborate documents. on lessons learned and project strategy for replication
[Added: 2019/02/18]
MVOTMA with UNDP CO 2019/12 Overdue-Initiated In process

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org