- Evaluation Plan:
- 2011-2017, Russian Federation
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 02/2018
- Completion Date:
- 09/2018
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 40,000
Reducing GHG emissions from road transport in Russia's medium-sized cities: Russian Urban Sustainable Transport
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR Intenational consultant Final Evaluation Transport Project - final.docx |
tor | English | 46.01 KB | Posted | 101 |
| 18.07_TOR National consultant Final Evaluation Transport Project JO.DOCX |
tor | English | 36.36 KB | Posted | 81 |
 Russian Transport Project TE for posting on ERC.pdf |
report | English | 2480.87 KB | Posted | 74 |
| Title | Reducing GHG emissions from road transport in Russia's medium-sized cities: Russian Urban Sustainable Transport | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 63176 | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2011-2017, Russian Federation | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
| Completion Date: | 09/2018 | ||||||||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 02/2018 | ||||||||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017) |
|
||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 40,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Source of Funding: | GEF | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 32,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation, Administration of Kaliningrad City, Administration of Kazan City | ||||||||||||||
| Countries: | RUSSIAN FEDERATION |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | There needs to be a better balance and flexibility provided to the PMU and Implementing Agency to modify the project program and indicators once it has been started, particularly when macro events can severely change the chance of success of key activities. |
| 2 | Limit the number of activity types in project design and rather focus on doing these limited number of activities very well. |
1. Recommendation:
There needs to be a better balance and flexibility provided to the PMU and Implementing Agency to modify the project program and indicators once it has been started, particularly when macro events can severely change the chance of success of key activities.
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/14]
This is forthcoming.
Key Actions:
2. Recommendation:
Limit the number of activity types in project design and rather focus on doing these limited number of activities very well.
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/14]
This is forthcoming.
Key Actions: