Reducing GHG emissions from road transport in Russia's medium-sized cities: Russian Urban Sustainable Transport

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2011-2017, Russian Federation
Evaluation Type:
Final Project
Planned End Date:
02/2018
Completion Date:
09/2018
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
40,000

Share

Title Reducing GHG emissions from road transport in Russia's medium-sized cities: Russian Urban Sustainable Transport
Atlas Project Number: 63176
Evaluation Plan: 2011-2017, Russian Federation
Evaluation Type: Final Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 09/2018
Planned End Date: 02/2018
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Others
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Output 1.5. Inclusive and sustainable solutions adopted to achieve increased energy efficiency and universal modern energy access (especially off-grid sources of renewable energy)
Evaluation Budget(US $): 40,000
Source of Funding: GEF
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): 32,000
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Jesse Uzzell
Artur Romanenko
GEF Evaluation: Yes
GEF Project Title: Reducing GHG emissions from road transport in Russia's medium-sized cities: Russian Urban Sustainable Transport
Evaluation Type: Terminal Evaluation
Focal Area: Climate Change
Project Type: FSP
GEF Phase: GEF-3
GEF Project ID: 4008
PIMS Number: 4304
Key Stakeholders: Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation, Administration of Kaliningrad City, Administration of Kazan City
Countries: RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1

There needs to be a better balance and flexibility provided to the PMU and Implementing Agency to modify the project program and indicators once it has been started, particularly when macro events can severely change the chance of success of key activities.

2

Limit the number of activity types in project design and rather focus on doing these limited number of activities very well.

1. Recommendation:

There needs to be a better balance and flexibility provided to the PMU and Implementing Agency to modify the project program and indicators once it has been started, particularly when macro events can severely change the chance of success of key activities.

Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/14]

This is forthcoming.

Key Actions:

2. Recommendation:

Limit the number of activity types in project design and rather focus on doing these limited number of activities very well.

Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/14]

This is forthcoming.

Key Actions:

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

220 East 42nd Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org