- Evaluation Plan:
- 2016-2020, Indonesia
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Project
- Planned End Date:
- 08/2018
- Completion Date:
- 07/2018
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 40,000
00077733 Enhancing the Protected Area System in Sulawesi (E-PASS) for Biodiversity Conservation GEF Mid-term Evaluation
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 EPASS Mid Term Review.docx |
report | English | 1827.38 KB | Posted | 397 |
 ToR consultant MTR-EPASS-26 Feb-revised-ES.pdf |
tor | English | 517.14 KB | Posted | 233 |
| Title | 00077733 Enhancing the Protected Area System in Sulawesi (E-PASS) for Biodiversity Conservation GEF Mid-term Evaluation | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00077733 | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2016-2020, Indonesia | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Project | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
| Completion Date: | 07/2018 | ||||||||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 08/2018 | ||||||||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| UNDP Signature Solution: |
|
||||||||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||||||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 40,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Source of Funding: | EPASS Project | ||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 20,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||||||||||
| Countries: | INDONESIA |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| 1. | The mid-term review/evaluation (MTR) has gathered lesson learnt for project's implementation , as follow;
|
| Findings | |
| 1. | From the mid term evaluation findings, it has shown that Project has accomplished many achievements and is progresivelly maintaining efforts to meet the target results. It estimates current progress of each project's outcomes are as follow:
|
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | UNDP-CO should adjust the project budget in order to reduce the IN-KIND contributions to more realistic levels. |
| 2 | The MoEF should consider initiating actions to implement key recommendations made by the WCS that have not yet been acted upon (see Annex IX). |
| 3 | BAPPENAS should accelerate the process of completing Outcome 2 and consider other models that might ensure a predictable, reliable, constant and sufficient flow of funds to ensure the future sustainability of the PAs (such as the one proposed by the MTR Team). |
| 4 | The MoEF should allow PMU/FCU staff to work directly with the communities when PA staff is not available to accompany them. |
| 5 | The UNDP-CO should consider making a detailed financial analysis to determine if there will be surplus funds available at the end of the project. |
| 6 | If so, the MTR believes they should be used to finance the WCS’ proposal for additional complementary activities which the MTR Team fully endorses, as per the proposal enclosed below (see Annex X). |
| 7 | The GEF and UNDP-CO should consider using any additional surplus funds that might be identified after a financial analysis, to reinforce the Micro-grants fund. |
| 8 | The UNDP-CO and the MoEF should ensure that at least 50% of all the funding disbursed by the Micro-grants Fund go towards financing initiatives of women’s community groups. |
| 9 | MTR recommends “no additional cost” extension of one year, in order to allow the project to complete its three outcomes. |
1. Recommendation:
UNDP-CO should adjust the project budget in order to reduce the IN-KIND contributions to more realistic levels.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2018/11/10]
The project conducted a series of meeting in coordination with the Implementing Partner, BAPPENAS and UNDP to respond the recommendations, including a meeting with the MTR consultants in Atlet Century Hotel in 26 July 2018
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNDP CO will adjust in accordance with the guidance of BRH and HQ.
[Added: 2018/11/10] [Last Updated: 2019/12/26] |
UNDP CO | 2019/10 | Completed | Using reference from evaluation findings, We adjusted our implementation plan. We also consulted with BRH and HQ regarding to this matters. History |
2. Recommendation:
The MoEF should consider initiating actions to implement key recommendations made by the WCS that have not yet been acted upon (see Annex IX).
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2018/11/10]
The project conducted a series of meeting in coordination with the Implementing Partner, BAPPENAS and UNDP to respond the recommendations, including a meeting with the MTR consultants in Atlet Century Hotel in 26 July 2018
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Need further discussions with WCS to initiate actions to carry out recommendations
[Added: 2019/06/15] [Last Updated: 2019/12/26] |
UNDP CO and implementing partners | 2019/10 | Completed | Further discussions with WCS have been conducted and actions will be carried out upon recommendations. History |
3. Recommendation:
BAPPENAS should accelerate the process of completing Outcome 2 and consider other models that might ensure a predictable, reliable, constant and sufficient flow of funds to ensure the future sustainability of the PAs (such as the one proposed by the MTR Team).
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2018/11/10]
The project conducted a series of meeting in coordination with the Implementing Partner, BAPPENAS and UNDP to respond the recommendations, including a meeting with the MTR consultants in Atlet Century Hotel in 26 July 2018
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bappenas has appointed ICRAF for completing Outcome 2. Several meetings have been conducted.
[Added: 2019/06/15] [Last Updated: 2019/12/25] |
UNDP CO and Implementing Partners | 2019/09 | Completed | Bappenas has mainstreamed the protected area financing into RPJMN 2020-2024. The business plan for National Park (NP) Bogani Nani Wartabone has been created and the pilot project implementation will be completed in 2020. The Development of business plan in NP Lore Lindu and KPHK Tangkoko will also be completed in 2020. Bappenas will initiate the establishment of Forum Wallacea Sulawesi to enhance coordination between protected areas in Sulawesi. Key stakeholders including private sector and philanthropy will be engaged to gather supports for sustainable protected areas protection and management. History |
4. Recommendation:
The MoEF should allow PMU/FCU staff to work directly with the communities when PA staff is not available to accompany them.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2018/11/10]
The project conducted a series of meeting in coordination with the Implementing Partner, BAPPENAS and UNDP to respond the recommendations, including a meeting with the MTR consultants in Atlet Century Hotel in 26 July 2018.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The PA staff needed to guide the site territories and explains the project implementation in project sites.
[Added: 2019/06/15] [Last Updated: 2019/09/01] |
UNDP CO and Implementing Partners | 2019/08 | Completed | The key actions was completed and reported to PIR donor report 2019. History |
5. Recommendation:
The UNDP-CO should consider making a detailed financial analysis to determine if there will be surplus funds available at the end of the project.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2018/11/07]
Key Actions:
6. Recommendation:
If so, the MTR believes they should be used to finance the WCS’ proposal for additional complementary activities which the MTR Team fully endorses, as per the proposal enclosed below (see Annex X).
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07]
Key Actions:
7. Recommendation:
The GEF and UNDP-CO should consider using any additional surplus funds that might be identified after a financial analysis, to reinforce the Micro-grants fund.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07]
Key Actions:
8. Recommendation:
The UNDP-CO and the MoEF should ensure that at least 50% of all the funding disbursed by the Micro-grants Fund go towards financing initiatives of women’s community groups.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07]
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ensured Community Engagement Specialist at Project Implementation Unit in all 3 PAs initiated women’s community groups proposals for micro-grants program.
[Added: 2019/06/15] [Last Updated: 2019/06/20] |
UNDP | 2019/04 | Completed | The document to support verification of key action is enclosed. History |
9. Recommendation:
MTR recommends “no additional cost” extension of one year, in order to allow the project to complete its three outcomes.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07]
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Board Meeting on November 22, 2018 agreed to extend the project for one year with no additional cost scheme in order to complete its three outcomes as recommended by MTR. Director General of KSDAE as Head of Project Board has issued letter No S.25/KSDAE/KKH/KSA.2/01/2019 on January 11, 2019 for project extension.
[Added: 2019/06/15] [Last Updated: 2019/06/20] |
UNDP and Implementing partner | 2019/01 | Completed | Result of project meeting can be accessed in the attachment. History |