- Evaluation Plan:
- 2018-2022, Costa Rica
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 12/2018
- Completion Date:
- 09/2018
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 46,500
Project Conservation, sustainable use of biodiversity and maintenance of ecosystem services of protected wetlands of international importance Wetlands Final Term Evaluation (FTE)
Share
Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
tor | Spanish | 85.79 KB | Posted | 1272 |
![]() |
report | English | 233.03 KB | Posted | 1526 |
![]() |
report | English | 376.12 KB | Posted | 1319 |
Title | Project Conservation, sustainable use of biodiversity and maintenance of ecosystem services of protected wetlands of international importance Wetlands Final Term Evaluation (FTE) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlas Project Number: | 00076970 | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Plan: | 2018-2022, Costa Rica | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||||||||
Status: | Completed | ||||||||||||||
Completion Date: | 09/2018 | ||||||||||||||
Planned End Date: | 12/2018 | ||||||||||||||
Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
Focus Area: |
|
||||||||||||||
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||||||||
SDG Goal |
|
||||||||||||||
SDG Target |
|
||||||||||||||
Evaluation Budget(US $): | 46,500 | ||||||||||||||
Source of Funding: | GEF | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 9,000 | ||||||||||||||
Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||||||||
Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||||||||
Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||||||||
GEF Evaluation: | Yes
|
||||||||||||||
Key Stakeholders: | SINAC, MINAE, UNDP | ||||||||||||||
Countries: | COSTA RICA |
Lessons | |
---|---|
1. |
|
Findings | |
1. |
|
Recommendations | |
---|---|
1 | In the design of future projects UNDP should focus on getting a clearer identification of other of its priorities, such as the SDGs, which should be articulated with different indicators, activities and outputs. |
2 | From the design of projects, with an early and specific identification of the stakeholders that cause threats to wetland ecosystems (or any other biodiversity element) UNDP may further enhance project beneficiaries and allies, as well as inclusion of relevant social groups on prioritized issues (gender, fight against poverty, others). |
3 | UNDP should position gender as a necessary and strategic topic from the formulation phases of the projects, with clear indicators. |
4 | SINAC should make the National Wetland Inventory available through the SNIT and other platforms, in a transparent and open manner. |
Key Action Update History
In the design of future projects UNDP should focus on getting a clearer identification of other of its priorities, such as the SDGs, which should be articulated with different indicators, activities and outputs.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2018/11/07]
Project documents, such as the Wetlands Project, developed prior to the Sustainable Development Agenda did not include SDG considerations nor gender gap analysis. The latest Project document formats already establish linkages between SDGs, as well as within other international and national frameworks such as UNDAF, UNDP Strategic plans.
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The LPAC process in the Country now reviews linkages with SDG, as well as UNDAF, UNDP SP and national priorities such as NBSAP 2016-2025.
[Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2019/01/15] |
UNDP Office | 2019/12 | Completed | History |
From the design of projects, with an early and specific identification of the stakeholders that cause threats to wetland ecosystems (or any other biodiversity element) UNDP may further enhance project beneficiaries and allies, as well as inclusion of relevant social groups on prioritized issues (gender, fight against poverty, others).
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2018/11/07]
New project requirements for GCF, GEF, AF require specific screening for stakeholders, nevertheless LPAC will review that adequate and early identification of social, productive sectors are involved at initial stages of project development and throughout implementation.
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPAC meetings review adequate level of engagement
[Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2019/01/15] |
UNDP Office | 2019/12 | Completed | History |
UNDP should position gender as a necessary and strategic topic from the formulation phases of the projects, with clear indicators.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07]
UNDP office is undergoing gender seal certification which requires a review of all processes so that gender is mainstreamed in operations and programmatic approach.
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender review and gender seal certification preparation at UNDP office is in place.
[Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2020/08/05] |
UNDP Office | 2019/12 | Completed | La oficina está en la etapa final del proceso de certificación del sello de género del PNUD. En este marco, se han actualizado los procesos para que todos los nuevos proyectos diseñados incluyan la perspectiva de género dentro de sus análisis. History |
SINAC should make the National Wetland Inventory available through the SNIT and other platforms, in a transparent and open manner.
Management Response: [Added: 2018/11/07]
SINAC should share and publish National Wetland Inventory
Key Actions:
Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SINAC is reviewing final map to publish the Wetland updated inventory.
[Added: 2018/11/07] [Last Updated: 2019/01/15] |
SINAC territorial planning unit | 2019/12 | Completed | History |