- Evaluation Plan:
- 2016-2020, Armenia
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 12/2020
- Completion Date:
- 12/2020
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 10,000
Integrated Support to Rural Development: Building Resilient Communities, Final Evaluation
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR_Tavush Project Evaluation_National Consutant.docx |
tor | English | 94.80 KB | Posted | 495 |
| Final Evaluation Report_ISRDBRC 13 Nov.docx |
report | English | 332.20 KB | Posted | 472 |
| Title | Integrated Support to Rural Development: Building Resilient Communities, Final Evaluation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00081907 | ||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2016-2020, Armenia | ||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||||
| Completion Date: | 12/2020 | ||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 12/2020 | ||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||||
| UNDP Signature Solution: |
|
||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 10,000 | ||||||||
| Source of Funding: | UNDP | ||||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 3,000 | ||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | |||||||||
| Countries: | ARMENIA |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | The Project represents a successful model-platform for complex multi-agencies/multi-beneficiary intervention and its application should be further promoted. The Project should further support and scale-up models of sustainable production and processing in the communities resulting in income raise for the households in the rural areas. All the models should be to the biggest extent inclusive targeting women, the youth, and other vulnerable groups and should ensure decent jobs and comprehensive support from the stage of consulting to capacity building and provision of production means. The Project’s innovative management model of community-based organizations should be replicated as a prerequisite to the sustainability of the Project interventions. Given the Project's positive results, a continuation would be highly recommended, not only attempting to replicate and upscale the activities already carried out, but also moving beyond expanding work in other regions and in other communities. |
| 2 | The Project should be implemented in its well-developed visibility strategy making sure that the success stories were on spot locally and regionally and the Project-funded assets and construction should be easily identifiable for the locals and the donors. |
| 3 | Collaboration with international organizations and local agencies, also paying attention to the engagement of the private sector, should continue to be nurtured and strengthened. |
| 4 | In order to reinforce initial benefits and build upon them, future directions should consider reinforcing the positive aspects demonstrated by this Project in respect to the community-based approaches discussed in this document and build upon what has been field-tested and proven as demonstrated by the achievement of the Project and its local-level sub-projects. |