- Evaluation Plan:
- 2018-2020, Somalia
- Evaluation Type:
- Final Project
- Planned End Date:
- 10/2018
- Completion Date:
- 11/2018
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- No
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 51,000
End of Project: Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TOR for Final Evaluation - UNDP GEWE project and UN joint PBF project.docx |
tor | English | 40.54 KB | Posted | 1418 |
 Final Evaluation Report GEWE.pdf |
report | English | 724.86 KB | Posted | 1530 |
| Annexes. Final Evaluation Report.pdf |
related-document | English | 667.71 KB | Posted | 1419 |
| Executive Summary. Evalaution Report GEWE.pdf |
summary | English | 220.11 KB | Posted | 1290 |
| Title | End of Project: Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00085380 | ||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2018-2020, Somalia | ||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Final Project | ||||||
| Status: | Completed | ||||||
| Completion Date: | 11/2018 | ||||||
| Planned End Date: | 10/2018 | ||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | ||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
||||||
| SDG Goal |
|
||||||
| SDG Target |
|
||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 51,000 | ||||||
| Source of Funding: | Project | ||||||
| Evaluation Expenditure(US $): | 51,000 | ||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | ||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | ||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | Government of Somalia | ||||||
| Countries: | SOMALIA |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 |
|
| 2 | · It is appropriate to direct efforts towards those priorities, sectors and places that are most prepared to assimilate the changes and to adopt the expected capacity building dynamics. · It is necessary to design long-term programming for structural problems and more small and immediate projects on agreed priorities among all social, political and cooperation actors. The priorities must be based on mature themes to be addressed, very focused, and under the commitment and coordination of all actors involved, for a true mainstreaming and joint action |
| 3 | · The work content of the gender staff members -at all levels- and Project staff should be defined more precisely, so that it includes mainstreaming tasks within the UNDP, within UN, with the government partners and between its different instances, and with the partners of civil society and between them. · The Project has demonstrated that the articulation of all social, political and cooperation agents towards the same purpose is an efficient strategy. The articulation and coordination with all actors is essential when we count with limited resources. In this way, UNDP positions its role and added value as interlocutor with governments and key actor in the different national processes. · Regional Offices must make a greater effort for articulation in gender issues. Inside UNDP, it should be easier, because normally the staff articulates several initiatives. At the inter-agency level, it is necessary that there be an interagency coordination instance in which integral approaches to problems that require comprehensive responses are discussed. · In the same way, greater involvement with civil society partners should be achieved. CSOs should be accompanied by the gender staff for an effective skills transfer, but also, an articulated work dynamic should be encouraged among them. For this purpose, it is opportune select the CSOs that will accompany each intervention according to their expertise and geographic coverage. Afterwards, dynamics of articulation and complementarity between them must be aroused, including the formation between each other. |
| 4 | · It is necessary to pay attention to the social sustainability of the advances promoted. In addition to working at a decision-making level, it is necessary to work with society to create conditions to accept the changes. The society must be prepared in advance for these expected changes. Communication for Development C4D strategies can be used. It is about using communication as a programmatic tool oriented to generate social and political support for the changes promoted. UNDP has issued Guidelines for this methodologic approach at a global level. · Systematize experiences into a strategy of knowledge sharing, use to be a very useful strategy for identify what good practices are interesting and innovative and can be turned into knowledge products at country level, and how they complement each other. · Systematizing experiences serves to multiply successful ones, but also to mobilize resources through demonstrating the capacity to produce changes. Communication actions with donors and with other cooperation agencies facilitates the visibility of achievements, inter-agency coordination, and resource mobilization. |