Evaluation Detail

Terminal Evaluation “Rhino Bonds” Rhino Impact Investment (RII): An Innovative Financing Mechanism for Site-Based Rhinoceros Conservation (PIMS 5382)

Evaluation Plan:: 2018-2021, Bureau for Policy and Programme Support
Evaluation Type:: Final Project
Planned End Date:: 03/2020
Completion Date:: 08/2020
Status:: Completed
Management Response:: No
Evaluation Budget(US $):: 30,000

Document	Type	Language	Size	Status	Downloads
TE TOR (PIMS 5382 - Rhino Bonds) final.docx	tor	English	53.76 KB	Posted	25
Annexes to TE TOR (PIMS 5382 - Rhino Bonds).docx	tor	English	83.01 KB	Posted	12
Deliverable 3 Terminal Evaluation 180720 (signed) PS FINAL (PIMS 5382).docx	report	English	347.92 KB	Posted	26

Title

Terminal Evaluation “Rhino Bonds” Rhino Impact Investment (RII): An Innovative Financing Mechanism for Site-Based Rhinoceros Conservation (PIMS 5382)

Atlas Project Number:

00088255

Evaluation Plan:

2018-2021, Bureau for Policy and Programme Support

Evaluation Type:

Final Project

Status:

Completed

Completion Date:

08/2020

Planned End Date:

03/2020

Management Response:

Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021)

1. Output 1.4.1 Solutions scaled up for sustainable management of natural resources, including sustainable commodities and green and inclusive value chains

Evaluation Budget(US $):

30,000

Source of Funding:

UNDP-GEF project resources

Evaluation Expenditure(US $):

16,222

Joint Programme:

Joint Evaluation:

Evaluation Team members:

Name	Title	Email	Nationality
Jose	Galindo	jose@mentefactura.com

GEF Evaluation:

Yes

GEF Project Title:	Rhino Impact Investment (RII): An Innovative Financing Mechanism for Site-Based Rhinoceros Conservation
Evaluation Type:	Terminal Evaluation
Focal Area:	Biodiversity
Project Type:	MSP
GEF Phase:	GEF-5
GEF Project ID:	5721
PIMS Number:	5382

Key Stakeholders:

Countries:

GLOBAL

Lessons
1.	Innovation itself is complex, donors are usually ill equipped to fully endorse and invest in creating a paradigm breaker, something entirely new that was not there before. When there are no models to follow, energy could be canalized more efficiently towards creativity and innovation. Incubating innovation should be careful to take one step at the time, the RII was combining a three steps approach into one single intervention. In this case it was not only about creating an entirely new mechanism and receiving large technical and institutional endorsement, but to add on complexity, design chose to test in different protected areas, across different countries, cultures and institutional settings. Higher level leadership is required to convene senior donor decision-makers to unlock key sources such as bilateral donors as potential outcome-payers. The Project Board composition could play a determinant role to fill gaps and open doors where needed. Future similar projects should be careful to have a balanced approach between conservation and finance profiles at all implementation levels. Such projects need experienced financial advice, in-depth knowledge about financial markets and the capacity to leverage high level endorsement and support. The RII could have benefit from a team with greater financial background, a board with clearer commitment to support fundraising, and earlier involvement from implementing partners specialized in impact investment. However, it is worth mentioning that Credit Suisse, only got involved once there was sufficient detail backing up the intervention. For future similar projects, the most repeated lesson learned out of different interviews is: “Don’t go too far without an outcome payer”. Successful projects are based on individuals, success in this kind of uncertain and innovative projects is usually driven by vision, strong leadership and individual commitment from the project team to move implementation forward. Bridging the gap between financial markets and species conservation, demand an entirely new set of intermediaries outside of the traditional conservation NGO framework. The RII demonstrated an interesting model for future private-public partnerships, bringing in not only capital also expertise on cost effective management and results-based compensation. Although rhino expert networks in Africa and Asia perform very similar roles, a differentiated approach should be considered for future projects, as different capacities and consolidation levels present barriers for simultaneous implementation. Gender issues were not included in the original project design, nor after the in-depth adjustment to the results framework, almost two years later. The project was designed under the context and circumstances of the GEF 5, where gender was not as emphasised as it is now. However, this TE has been developed according to the updated evaluation guidelines, leading into a gap, since it assesses issues that were not incorporated formally into the different implementation tools.
Findings

View report for recommendation

Terminal Evaluation “Rhino Bonds” Rhino Impact Investment (RII): An Innovative Financing Mechanism for Site-Based Rhinoceros Conservation (PIMS 5382)

Share

Evaluations by Unit

Latest Evaluations

Evaluation Snap Shot

Contact us