| Commissioning Unit: | Jordan |
|---|---|
| Evaluation Plan: | 2013-2017 |
| Evaluation Type: | Project |
| Completion Date: | 10/2013 |
| Unit Responsible for providing Management Response: | Jordan
|
| Documents Related to overall Management Response: |
|
Key Action Update History
Management Response: [Added: 2013/11/24]
The long lag time between PB meetings was to ensure that there are solid deliverables to report on for the meeting. Now that most major deliverables (research consultancies) are completed, the remaining activities are the installation of the labs and the execution of the awareness campaign. Especially for the awareness campaign, it is will indeed be important for the PB to meet ? or, if not possible, then the PAC.
Key Actions:
Management Response: [Added: 2013/11/24]
The methodology will be modified to incorporate additional levels of detail and advice from the evaluator on how to calculate cumulative emissions.
Key Actions:
Management Response: [Added: 2013/11/24]
UNDP remains committed to its share of the co-financing agreement and will disburse all remaining funds during the 2014 implementation phase. The GoJ has so far committed to its co-financing share and so far part of the money has been transferred to the project.
Key Actions:
Management Response: [Added: 2013/11/24]
During the inception workshop no issues were flagged which necessitated the modification of the results framework and as such they were not changed. By late 2011, when the project had only been active for less than 4 months: at that point and beyond, the necessity of modifying the results framework had become clear and, consequently, a revision was conducted and approved by the PB and RTA.
Key Actions:
Management Response: [Added: 2013/11/24]
During the inception workshop no issues were flagged which necessitated the modification of the results framework and as such they were not changed. By late 2011, when the project had only been active for less than 4 months: at that point and beyond, the necessity of modifying the results framework had become clear and, consequently, a revision was conducted and approved by the PB and RTA.
Key Actions:
Management Response: [Added: 2013/11/24]
During the inception workshop no issues were flagged which necessitated the modification of the results framework and as such they were not changed. By late 2011, when the project had only been active for less than 4 months: at that point and beyond, the necessity of modifying the results framework had become clear and, consequently, a revision was conducted and approved by the PB and RTA.
Key Actions:
Management Response: [Added: 2013/11/24]
This was discussed with the evaluator based on the project?s intent to disseminate the results of the consultancies (notably Technical Market Assessment and the Policy Option) to other countries in the region. RCREEE was suggested as a good option since it has relations with many Arab states through their representatives from the respective Ministry of Energy in each country.
Key Actions:
Management Response: [Added: 2013/11/24]
It is agreed that, to ensure the successful delivery of the washing machine labs, the current end date of June 2014 is very tight. An additional 6 month no-cost extension will give enough time to ensure said delivery. The extension will also allow additional time to carry out the awareness campaign to ensure reaching a larger number of consumers.
Key Actions: